Ultraschall Med 2024; 45(06): 557-563
DOI: 10.1055/a-2408-0979
Article in several languages:
English
|
deutsch
Sascha Hoffmann
Department of obstetrics and gynecology, University of Tübingen, Germany
,
Markus Hoopmann
Department of obstetrics and gynecology, University of Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
Permissions and Reprints
Introduction
Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is a widely used procedure, and it is becoming increasingly important in gynecological surgery [1]. Previously, the scientific focus of sonography in gynecology was on preoperative diagnosis and targeted treatment planning. In recent years, due to the rapidly growing evidence of the potential that gynecological sonography holds for diagnostic imaging, dignity assessment, and spread diagnostics of malignant (e. g. ovarian cancer) and benign processes (e. g. endometriosis), OB/GYN ultrasound has become part of many guidelines, expert recommendations, standardized quality requirements, and training programs [2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6].
Publication History
Article published online:
11 December 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
References
1
Lubner MG,
Mankowski GettleL,
Kim DH.
et al. Diagnostic and procedural intraoperative ultrasound: technique, tips and tricks for optimizing results. Br J Radiol 2021; 94: 20201406
2
Bent RE,
Wilson MD,
Jacoby VL.
et al. Myoma Imaging by Gynecologic Surgeons Training in Intraoperative Ultrasound Technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26: 1139-1143
3
Harmsen MJ,
Van den Bosch T,
de Leeuw RA.
et al. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60: 118-131
4
Keckstein J,
Hoopmann M,
Merz E.
et al. Expert opinion on the use of transvaginal sonography for presurgical staging and classification of endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307: 5-19
5
Krentel H,
Keckstein J,
Füger T.
et al. Accuracy of ultrasound signs on two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in prediction of adenomyosis: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62: 739-746
6
Munro MG,
Critchley HOD,
Fraser IS.
et al. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143: 393-408
7
Grewal K,
Jones B,
L’Heveder A.
et al. The Use of intra-operative Ultrasound in Gynecological Surgery: A Review. Future Science OA Taylor & Francis 2021; 7: FSO678
8
Pavone M,
Seeliger B,
Teodorico E.
et al. Ultrasound-guided robotic surgical procedures: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 2359-2370
9
Coccia ME,
Becattini C,
Bracco GL.
et al. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for operative hysteroscopy. A prospective study. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 413-418
10
Dora AK,
Choudhury S,
Halder A.
et al. OHVIRA syndrome: hysteroscopy and intraoperative sonography – a value addition in the management. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16: e256552
11
Ludwin A,
Ludwin I,
Pityński K.
et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided hysteroscopic myomectomy of submucosal myomas with a varying degree of myometrial penetration. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 672-685
12
Muzii L,
Galati G,
Mattei G.
et al. Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound for Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: a Controlled Study. Reprod Sci 2023; 30: 3372-3378
13
Wagenaar LP,
Hamerlynck TW,
Radder CM.
et al. Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2023; 120: 1243-1251
14
Acharya G,
Morgan H,
Paramanantham L.
et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing surgical termination of pregnancy with and without continuous ultrasound guidance. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 114: 69-74
15
Chaikof M,
Lazer T,
Gat I.
et al. Lower complication rates with office-based D&C under ultrasound guidance for missed abortion. Minerva Ginecol 2017; 69: 23-28
16
Darney PD,
Sweet RL.
Routine intraoperative ultrasonography for second trimester abortion reduces incidence of uterine perforation. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8: 71-75
17
Lurain JR.
Gestational trophoblastic disease I: epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, and management of hydatidiform mole. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 531-539
18
Reid S,
Casikar I,
Condous G.
The use of interventional ultrasound in early pregnancy complications. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2013; 16: 22-25
19
Jurkovic D,
Knez J,
Appiah A.
et al. Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 511-517
20
Peng Y,
Dai Y,
Yu G.
et al. Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39: 1449-1457
21
Sel G,
Sucu S,
Harma M.
et al. Successful management of cesarean scar pregnancy with vacuum extraction under ultrasound guidance. Acute Med Surg 2018; 5: 358-361
22
Weilin C,
Li J.
Successful treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancies with transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 183: 20-22
23
Angioli R,
Battista C,
Terranova C.
et al. Intraoperative contact ultrasonography during open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1487-1490
24
Levine DJ,
Berman JM,
Harris M.
et al. Sensitivity of myoma imaging using laparoscopic ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 770-774
25
Hao Y,
Li S-J,
Zheng P.
et al. Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted enucleation of residual fibroids following laparoscopic myomectomy. Clin Chim Acta 2019; 495: 652-655
26
Levine DJ,
Berman JM,
Harris M.
et al. Sensitivity of myoma imaging using laparoscopic ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 770-774
27
Patel HH,
Banerjee D,
Goldrath K.
et al. Intraoperative Laparoscopic Ultrasound Increases Fibroid Detection During Laparoscopic Myomectomy. JSLS 2022; 26: e2022.00038
28
Alec MS,
Mathieu VibertJJ,
Grass F.
et al. Intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound to standardize bowel endometriosis shaving. Fertil Steril 2024;
29
Condous G,
Gerges B,
Thomassin-Naggara I.
et al. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 64: 129-144
30
Hardman D,
Bennett R,
Mikhail E.
Laparoscopic shaving of rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis under laparoscopic ultrasound guidance. Fertil Steril 2023; 120: 206-207
31
Puppo A,
Olearo E,
Gattolin A.
et al. Intraoperative Ultrasound for Bowel Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Preliminary Report. J Ultrasound Med 2021; 40: 1417-1425
32
Ota Y,
Ota K,
Takahashi T.
et al. Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy under Real-Time Intraoperative Ultrasound Elastography Guidance: A Case Series and Feasibility Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 6707
33
Bahrami S,
Khatri G,
Sheridan AD.
et al. Pelvic floor ultrasound: when, why, and how?. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46: 1395-1413
34
Shek KL,
Dietz HP.
Ultrasound imaging of slings and meshes in urogynecology. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2021; 57: 526-538
35
González-Díaz E,
Fernández-Fernández C,
Martin Corral AV.
et al. Use of intraoperative ultrasound to improve tension-free vaginal tape-obturator placement: A pilot study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2023; 161: 833-838
36
Cola A,
Barba M,
Frigerio M.
Intraoperative ultrasound assessment of ureteral patency during pelvic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 32: 3313-3315
37
Galazis N,
Saso S,
Sorbi F.
et al. Intraoperative Ultrasound during Fertility-Sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Practical Applications. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2020; 85: 127-148
38
Jones BP,
Saso S,
Farren J.
et al. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided laparoscopic ovarian-tissue-preserving surgery for recurrent borderline ovarian tumor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 405-406
39
Jones BP,
Saso S,
Farren J.
et al. Ultrasound-Guided Laparoscopic Ovarian Wedge Resection in Recurrent Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumours. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27: 1813-1818
40
Basaran D,
Salman MC,
Boyraz G.
et al. Intraoperative Ex Vivo High-Resolution Sonography: A Novel Technique for the Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25: 1639-1644
41
Akbas T,
Ugurluer G,
Acil M.
et al. Intraoperative sonographic guidance for intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 2018; 46: 8-13
42
Manea E,
Chitoran E,
Rotaru V.
et al. Integration of Ultrasound in Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy in Cancer of the Uterine Cervix. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11: 506
43
Schaner PE,
Caudell JJ,
De Los SantosJF.
et al. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance during intracavitary brachytherapy applicator placement in cervical cancer: the University of Alabama at Birmingham experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013; 23: 559-566
44
Meijer S,
Paul MA,
Cuesta MA.
et al. Intra-operative ultrasound in detection of liver metastases. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 1210-1211
45
Sheriff NJ,
Thomas M,
Bunck AC.
et al. Registration accuracy comparing different rendering techniques on local vs external virtual 3D liver model reconstruction for vascular landmark setting by intraoperative ultrasound in augmented reality navigated liver resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409: 268
留言 (0)