Author commentary on Tawfik Khoury et al.

  SFX Search  Permissions and Reprints

Tawfik Khoury et al. Endoscopic ultrasound- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, including 5 RCTs and 519 patients, comparing EUS-guided biliary drainage vs. ERCP for primary drainage in inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction. Technical success, clinical success, 1-year stent patency, and adverse events were similar between the two groups, but the reintervention rate was lower in the EUS-guided drainage group. In subgroup analysis, EUS-guided drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent had a higher technical success rate than ERCP.


Quality: mobile360480720
Download Publication History

Article published online:
28 November 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Refers to: Endoscopic ultrasound- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsEndoscopy 2024; 56(12): 955-963
DOI: 10.1055/a-2340-0697

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif