Fatigue is defined as a subjective state of overwhelmingly prolonged debilitation and diminished capacity for physical and mental endeavors that is hardly alleviated by rest (1). Physical fatigue can be defined as an impairment in the ability to apply force or power, regardless of whether the task can still be performed successfully. In contrast, ramification is a type of fatigue that results in mental fatigue (2). Rest typically relieves fatigue in healthy individuals, which is a natural episode after physical or mental effort (3, 4).
The World Health Survey demonstrated that the burden of fatigue among community-dwelling individuals aged >60 years ranged from 27% to 50% (5, 6). Statistics from the Global Health Survey showed that among studies conducted in 10 European nations among community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older, the rates of fatigue were as high as 55% (7).
Fatigue has significant implications for human health; it can signal impending illness and mortality and undermine capacity, social cohesion, and motivation, despite its debilitating nature (8–11). Understanding the factors related to fatigue and implementing effective intervention schemes could help prevent fatigue, mitigate the process of aging, and reduce the odds of symptoms persisting after hospital discharge (12). Fatigue is a common symptom among older adults, yet it is often overlooked, with many patients and healthcare professionals assuming it to be an innate evolution of aging (13).
Factors contributing to episodes of fatigue or its progression are diverse and include socio-demographic, clinical, lifestyle-related, and biological factors. Studies conducted among older adults have indicated that the risk factors for fatigue include older age, being unmarried or widowed, having above and below normal body mass index (BMI), being female, low economic status, lower educational level, a history of hospitalization in the past year, comorbidities, depression, insomnia, poor social support, living alone, activities of daily living (ADL) dependency, physically inactivity, and cigarette smoking (14–28).
As evidence has demonstrated, there are no published studies on the prevalence and associated factors of fatigue among older adults in sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of fatigue and identify the associated risk factors among community-dwelling older adults in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods Study design and settingA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2023. The study was conducted in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia. The source population included all community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older. The study population consisted of older adults aged 60 years or older from selected kebeles during the study period. Those older adults who permanently resided for ≥6 months in the selected kebeles were included. The included study participants were both disease-free and had a formal diagnosis. Older adults who could not communicate, were critically ill, or had experienced an acute stroke were excluded.
Sample size determinationThe sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula, with the assumptions: a 50% population proportion, a 95% confidence interval (CI), a marginal error of 5%, and a 10% non-response rate.
n =(Zα/2)2p (1-p)d2 N =1.962×0.5×0.5/0.052=3.8416×0.25/0.0025 = 384.37~385.By considering a design effect of 1.5 and a 10% non-response rate multiplier, the minimum required sample size was 536. However, because of the effect of cluster sampling, a total of 651 older adults participated in the study.
Sampling technique and procedureWe recruited study participants from Bahir Dar, which has a population of 11,034 older adults across 26 kebeles. Eight kebeles were selected using the lottery method, and participants from selected kebeles were allocated proportionally, with each kebele contributing between 72 and 95 participants. The study participants were both disease-free and those with a formal diagnosis. A single-stage cluster sampling technique was used to select the study participants. All eligible older adults within the selected cluster were interviewed in their households (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the sampling procedure among the community-dwelling older adults in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, 2023.
Data collection proceduresEthical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, and informed consent was obtained from the study participants. After the participants provided informed consent, five trained healthcare professionals conducted a face-to-face interview using predefined and pretested structured questionnaires. The questionnaires had five components: sociodemographic characteristics, health-related factors, psychosocial factors, behavioral-related factors, and the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).
The other in-depth sections of the tool were developed based on previous articles, and the questionnaires were modified according to all the factors that were related to the study objectives. The English version of the questionnaires was translated into the Amharic language for data collection and then back into English for analysis to ensure consistency.
Data collection instruments and operational definitions FatigueIndividuals with a CFS score of ≥4 are considered to be fatigued. The CFS is an easy-to-understand, brief, and validated scale for assessing fatigue in older adults. It provides reliable and valid fatigue measurements, with α = 85%. It has been widely used because of its reliability and validity in assessing fatigue in both general and clinical populations. It consists of 11 items, with total scores ranging from 0 to 11. Each item has a score of either 0 or 1. The older participants who scored ≥4 were considered to be fatigued (29, 30).
ADL dependencyIt was measured using the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, with α = 84%. Individuals with a score of ≤ 5 are considered to have ADL dependence. It is commonly used to assess the functional status of older adults. The index ranks the adequacy of performance in six activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. The scores are categorized as “yes = 1” and “no = 0” for independence in each of the six activities, with the attainable score ranging from 0 to 6. A score of 6/6 indicates full function, 4/6 indicates moderate impairment, and 2/6 or less indicates severe functional impairment. The study participants who scored ≤ 5 were considered to have ADL dependence (31).
DepressionIt was measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), with α = 92%; Individuals with a score ≥5 are considered to be depressed. The GDS is used to screen for depressive symptoms, with the attainable score ranging from 0 to 15. Participants respond with “yes” or “no” to the 15 statements that describe either a positive or negative emotion (32).
Older adultsA person whose age is ≥60 years is referred to as an older adult (19, 27, 33).
Body mass index (BMI)Weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters (kg/m2) with the following categories: underweight (< 18.50), normal weight (18.50–24.99), overweight (≥25.00–29.9), and obese (30.0 and above) (34).
Physical activityIt is defined as any moderate-intensity exercise (such as walking, cycling, sports, or planned exercise and strength training) performed for at least 150 min per week (35).
SmokerSmokers were defined as adults who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and currently smoke every day. Former smokers were adults who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime but had quit smoking at the time of the interview (36).
InsomniaIt was assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), with α =79%. The index consists of seven items, with scores ranging from 0 to 28, and a score ≥15 indicates moderate to severe intensity (37).
Social supportIt was assessed using the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3), with α = 64%. The total score ranges from 3 to 14, with 3–8 points indicating poor social support, 9–11 points indicating moderate social support, and 12–14 points indicating strong social support (38).
KebelesA kebele is the name of a place used for zoning purposes in administrative activities. For example, in Ethiopia, the administrative hierarchy in the city is as follows: city–sub-city–woreda–kebele. Therefore, a kebele is at the lowest level in the administrative structure.
Data quality assurance and managementTo ensure the quality of the data, the data collectors and supervisors were trained by the principal investigators for 1 day before the start of the actual data collection. The training covered how to approach the participants, the objective of the study, and ethical issues. The supervisor ensured the completeness and consistency of the data. The questionnaires were pretested in Merawi before the actual data collection to assess the accuracy of the responses, language clarity, and the appropriateness of the questions. Pre-testing was performed on 5% of the total sample. It was carried out before the actual data collection period on a population with similar characteristics to the study population but not part of the actual study group. For the present study, the necessary changes were made based on the findings of the pretest.
Statistical analysesThe collected data were edited, coded, cleaned, and subsequently entered into EpiData version 4.6. After export, the data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. In the bivariate logistic regression analysis, variables with a p-value < 0.25 were considered potential candidates for the final multivariable logistic regression analyses. Variables with a p-value of < 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval (CI) were considered statistically significant, and their odds ratio (OR) was used to interpret the findings of the final model.
Results Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participantsOverall, 605 older adults participated in this study, with a 93% response rate. Among the total respondents, the majority [325 (53.7%)] were female (Table 1).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the community-dwelling older adults in Bahir Dar, Northwest, Ethiopia, 2023 (n = 605).
Psychosocial and health-related factors of the participantsAccording to the GDS screening, more than one-fourth of the participants had depressive symptoms. In addition, 164 (27.1%) had poor social support, 266 (44%) had insomnia, 108 (17.9%) had two or more comorbidities, 21 (3.5%) had a history of hospitalization, and 509 (84.1%) were physically inactive (Table 2).
Table 2. Psychosocial, health, and behavioral characteristics of the older adults in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023 (n = 605).
The prevalence of fatigue among study participantsThe overall prevalence of fatigue among older adults was 37.9% (95% CI, 34.00–41.90). Among them, 60.7% were female, 65.1% were 70 years old or older, 62.4% were widowed, and 52.4% were overweight (Tables 1, 2 and Figure 2).
Figure 2. Distribution of fatigue in relation to depression, physical activity, comorbidity, and insomnia among the community-dwelling older adults in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023 (n = 605).
Factors associated with fatigue among older adultsWe entered the independent variables into a bivariate logistic regression, and those with a p-value < 0.25 were included in a multivariable logistic regression to control for potential confounding factors. The multicollinearity of the variables was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF), and the values for all variables were < 10. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test yielded a value of 0.61. In the final model, the variables such as age 70 years or older, physical inactivity, having two or more comorbidities, depression, poor social support, and insomnia were significantly associated with fatigue (95% CI, p < 0.05).
Participants aged 70 years or older were 6 times more likely to develop fatigue than those aged 60–64 years [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 6.13, CI = 3.25–11.58]. Furthermore, older adults with two or more comorbidities were 5.6 times more likely to develop fatigue than those with no or one comorbidity (AOR = 5.68; CI = 2.97–10.83). Similarly, the older adults with insomnia were 5.4 times more likely to develop fatigue than those without insomnia (AOR = 5.48; CI = 3.38–8.88). Moreover, the older adults with depressive symptoms were 2.6 times more likely to develop fatigue than those without depressive symptoms (AOR = 2.65; CI = 1.60–4.36). The older adults with poor social support were 2.8 times more likely to experience fatigue than those with strong social support (AOR = 2.83; CI = 1.61–4.96). In addition, the older adults who were physically inactive were 3.3 times more likely to develop fatigue than those who were physically active (engaged in exercise; AOR = 3.33; CI = 1.56–7.12; Table 3).
Table 3. Factors associated with fatigue according to the bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of the study participants among community-dwelling older adults in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia 2023 (n = 605).
DiscussionThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of fatigue and its associated factors among community-dwelling older adults in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia, in 2023. The overall prevalence of fatigue was 37.9% (95% CI, 34.00–41.90). This finding indicated that more than one-fourth of the study participants are experiencing fatigue.
This finding is consistent with that of a study conducted in Turkey (40.3%). This may be due to the use of similar study designs, data collection methods, study settings, and participant age ranges. Most of the participants in the study conducted in Turkey and our group were independent and capable of performing daily tasks. The majority of the participants did not have comorbidities. Furthermore, the majority of the participants who reported fatigue were aged 70 years or older, inactive, and female (16).
The current study revealed a higher prevalence of fatigue compared to a study conducted in Canada (27%). This difference may be due to factors related to study design, study setting, health care, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study conducted in Canada was a prospective cohort study, with participants recruited from hospitals, and follow-up was conducted for 12 months. As a result, the participants might have been more aware of fatigue; appropriate treatment and preventive measures were provided. However, in our study, a cross-sectional design was used, and the participants were recruited from the community. Therefore, they might not have been unaware of fatigue and its preventive measures. Moreover, the study conducted in Canada excluded participants with schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, or low English literacy, conditions that may be associated with fatigue. In contrast, our study did not exclude these participants (26).
The present study reported a lower prevalence of fatigue compared to studies conducted in China (47.1%), Jordan (57%), South Korea (48.8%) (22), and Italy (44%). This discrepancy may be due to differences in study design, study setting, participants' utilization of health services, and the inclusion of different age groups. In the study conducted in China, the participants were recruited from hospitals and rural areas, and a self-administered data collection method was used. In contrast, our study recruited participants from the community and urban areas, and the data were collected using the face-to-face interview technique. Furthermore, the high level of fatigue among older adults in Jordan could be attributed to several factors: the participants were recruited from a health center, the use of the fatigue severity scale, and the fact that the majority of the participants had comorbidities. However, in our study, the participants were recruited from the community, the Chalder Fatigue Scale was used, and the majority of the respondents did not have comorbidities. In contrast to our study, the study conducted in South Korea used a convenience sampling technique to select participants from health services. In addition, 65% of the participants had at least two comorbidities, and the study focused on older adults aged 65 years or older. On the other hand, in our study, the participants were recruited through cluster sampling and from the community, and the majority of our study participants did not report comorbidities. In contrast to our study, the study conducted in Italy included participants aged 65–102 years, which might have increased the number of fatigue reports, and the data were collected using a self-administered technique. However, in our study, the participants' ages ranged from 60 to 89 years, and recruitment was performed using the cluster sampling method (14, 19, 20).
This study revealed that the participants aged 70 years or older were six times more likely to develop fatigue than those aged 60–64 years. The possible reason for this could be physiological changes associated with aging, as well as interactions between specific systems, such as inflammation and endocrine dysregulation, that increase the risk of fatigue. Generally, with aging, people experience reduced energy levels, a decline in physiological functions, and an increased risk of disease, all of which may further contribute to this phenomenon (12, 39). The results of this study are in agreement with those of studies conducted in China, Turkey, Italy, Israel, and Jordan (14–17, 19). Moreover, a systematic review conducted in the USA in 2020 on older individuals showed that advanced age increases the risk of fatigue (40).
This study showed that older adults with two or more comorbidities were 5.6 times more likely to experience fatigue than those with no or one comorbidity. This may be due to the accumulation of medical illnesses and other deficits at advanced ages, which predisposes individuals to adverse health outcomes such as physical inactivity, depressive symptoms, disability, prolonged hospital stays, complex pharmacological regimens, and increased vulnerability to fatigue (41, 42). Studies conducted in China, Italy, Jordan, and Israel (14, 17, 19, 20) support the current study's findings.
This study revealed that older adults with depressive symptoms were 2.6 times more likely to experience fatigue than those with no depressive symptoms. The possible reasons for this could be that depression and fatigue are linked in several ways: depression may directly cause fatigue, and chronic fatigue, in turn, may lead to depression (43). Depression also has indirect effects on sleep, diet, and physical activity (44). Consequently, the loss of muscle mass, strength, and exercise tolerance leads to an increase in cytokines, which is closely linked to the onset of fatigue (45, 46). This finding of the study is consistent with those of studies conducted in China, Pennsylvania, Jordan, South Korea, and Israel (17–20, 22).
This study reported that older adults who were physically inactive were 3.3 times more likely to experience fatigue than those who were physically active. A possible explanation could be that physical activity can reduce the risk of moderate to severe functional limitations in midlife and older adults, and it helps regulate metabolites and heat, which affect the stability of the internal environment (47, 48). This result is in agreement with studies conducted in Israel, Turkey, and Jordan (16, 17, 19).
The current study revealed that older adults with inadequate social support were 2.8 times more likely to experience fatigue compared to their counterparts with strong social support. A possible reason for this could be that poor social support is linked to depression and loneliness, both of which have been shown to alter brain function and increase the risk of alcohol use, cardiovascular diseases, and high blood pressure (49, 50). The study conducted in Jordan (19) supports the study's finding.
This study revealed that older adults with insomnia were 5.5 times more likely to experience fatigue compared to those without insomnia. A possible explanation could be that insomnia may cause both mental and physical fatigue, leading to an inability to accomplish tasks, a total lack of energy, and feelings of being overwhelmed. This can affect safety and make everyday life feel completely unmanageable (51, 52). Studies conducted in China, the USA, and Israel (17, 20, 23) support this study's findings.
Strengths and limitations of the studyOur study's strengths include the collection of relevant data on fatigue status and the identification of associated factors using an internationally validated tool for the subjective assessment of physical and mental fatigue. Furthermore, we used a community-based study design and more than four outcome-measuring instruments.
The study's possible drawbacks include the use of cluster sampling and interview methods, which might have resulted in fewer responses to sensitive topics. In addition, due to the cross-sectional nature of the study design, causal relationships could not be firmly established.
ConclusionThe prevalence of fatigue among older adults in Bahir Dar was notable and was identified as a public health issue in the study area. Age, multiple comorbidities, physical inactivity, poor social support, insomnia, and depression were associated with fatigue among older adults.
Our study findings suggest that the health bureau should emphasize reducing fatigue and promoting prevention strategies in health policy. Health professionals should provide continuous educational programs for older adults, especially those who have two or more comorbidities, depression, poor social support, insomnia, and are physically inactive, all of which require attention. The researchers should conduct more rigorous studies with a prospective study design to determine a nationally representative prevalence that includes rural older adults and assess the effectiveness of interventions.
Data availability statementThe original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statementEthical approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Review Committee University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences School of Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributionsBM: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JS: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis. YB: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. KG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. HM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. FS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. MT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. KC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. AM: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. GJ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
FundingThe author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
AcknowledgmentsWe are thankful to the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, for their support in conducting this research. We would also like to acknowledge the sub-cities and selected kebeles bureaus for their invaluable assistance during the data collection, as well as the study populations and data collectors for their engagement and contribution to the data collection.
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's noteAll claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
AbbreviationsCD, cognitive disability; ADL, activities of daily living; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CDC, communicable disease control; CGA, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; CI, confidence interval; COR, crude odd ratio; QOF, quality of life; SPSS, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; USA, Untied State of America; WHO, World Health Organization.
References1. Cella D, Peterman A, Passik S, Jacobsen P, Breitbart W. Progress toward guidelines for the management of fatigue. Oncology. (1998) 12(11A):369–77.
3. Loge JH, Ekeberg Ø, Kaasa S. Fatigue in the general Norwegian population: normative data and associations. J Psychosom Res. (1998) 45:53–65. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00291-2
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
4. Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale: application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. (1989) 46:1121–3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
5. Su Y, Cochrane BB Yu S-Y, Reding K, Herting JR. Zaslavsky O. Fatigue in community-dwelling older adults: a review of definitions, measures, and related factors. Geriatr Nurs. (2022) 43:266–79. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.12.010
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
6. Nations UJPD. World population ageing 2009. Washington, DC: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2010).
7. Santos-Eggimann B, Cuénoud P, Spagnoli J, Junod J. Prevalence of frailty in middle-aged and older community-dwelling Europeans living in 10 countries. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2009) 64:675–81. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp012
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
8. Jason LA, Corradi K, Gress S, Williams S, Torres-Harding S. Causes of death among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Health Care Women Int. (2006) 27:615–26. doi: 10.1080/07399330600803766
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
9. Kant I, Bültmann U, Schröer K, Beurskens A, Van Amelsvoort L, Swaen G, et al. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med. (2003) 60:i32–i9. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i32
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
10. McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D, Nazroo J, Pendleton N, Degens H. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology. (2016) 17:567–80. doi: 10.1007/s10522-016-9641-0
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
11. Bollegala D, Perruccio AV, Badley EM. Combined impact of concomitant arthritis and back problems on health status: results from a nationally representative health survey. Arthritis Care Res. (2011) 63:1584–91. doi: 10.1002/acr.20595
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
13. Gambert SRJC. “Why do I always feel tired?” Evaluating older patients reporting fatigue. Consultant. (2013) 53:785–9.
14. Vestergaard S, Nayfield SG, Patel KV, Eldadah B, Cesari M, Ferrucci L, et al. Fatigue in a representative population of older persons and its association with functional impairment, functional limitation, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2009) 64:76–82. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gln017
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
15. Lin W-Q, Jing M-J, Tang J, Wang J-J, Zhang H-S, Yuan L-X, et al. Factors associated with fatigue among men aged 45 and older: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2015) 12:10897–909. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120910897
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
16. Soyuer F, Senol V. Fatigue and physical activity levels of 65 and over older people living in rest home. Int J Gerontol. (2011) 5:13–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijge.2011.01.003
Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
19. Malak MZ, Abu Adas M, Al-Amer R, Yousef NN, Ali RM. Evaluation of fatigue among older population in Jordan. Exp Aging Res. (2021) 47:464–77. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2021.1908764
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
20. Zou S, Liu Z-H, Yan X, Wang H, Li Y, Xu X, et al. Prevalence and correlates of fatigue and its association with quality of life among clinically stable older psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study. Glob Health. (2020) 16:119. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00644-6
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
21. Reyes-Gibby CC, Aday LA, Anderson KO, Mendoza TR. Cleeland CS. Pain, depression, and fatigue in community-dwelling adults with and without a history of cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. (2006) 32:118–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.01.008
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
22. Kim H, Son H. Fatigue-related factors for community-dwelling older adults with diabetes: a theory-guided multi-dimensional approach using the dynamic biopsychosocial model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:4502. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224502
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
23. Goldman SE, Ancoli-Israel S, Boudreau R, Cauley JA, Hall M, Stone KL, et al. Sleep problems and associated daytime fatigue in community-dwelling older individuals. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2008) 63:1069–75. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.10.1069
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
24. Egerton T, Chastin SF, Stensvold D, Helbostad JL. Fatigue may contribute to reduced physical activity among older people: an observational study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2016) 71:670–6. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv150
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
25. Respini D, Jacobsen PB, Thors C, Tralongo P, Balducci L. The prevalence and correlates of fatigue in older cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. (2003) 47:273–9. doi: 10.1016/S1040-8428(02)00176-2
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
27. Schultz-Larsen K. Avlund K. Tiredness in daily activities: a subjective measure for the identification of frailty among non-disabled community-living older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2007) 44:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2006.03.005
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
28. Giannouli V. Fatigue, depression, and obesity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; more questions than answers: comment on the article by Katz et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). (2017) 69:454–5. doi: 10.1002/acr.23020
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
29. Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res. (1993) 37:147–53. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-P
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
31. Takele MD, Sany K, Getie K, Imiru D, Jember G, Gobezie M, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of frailty among community dweller older adults living in Gondar town, northwest, Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23(1):1309. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16201-w
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
33. Peralta M, Ramos M, Lipert A, Martins J, Marques A. Prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity in older adults from 10 European countries from 2005 to 2013. Am J Nurs. (2018) 46:522–9. doi: 10.1177/1403494818764810
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
34. Czeisler MÉ, Marynak K, Clarke KE, Salah Z, Shakya I, Thierry JM, et al. Delay or avoidance of medical care because of COVID-19–related concerns—United States, June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2020) 69:1250. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4
留言 (0)