Plasma glycome reflects low back pain progression and is not predictive of acute-to-chronic pain transition

Abstract

Aims: To investigate if the plasma N-glycome would provide a biomarker of acute-to-chronic low back pain (LBP) transition. Patients & Methods: A prospective longitudinal sample of n = 1,114 individuals enrolled at the first ever episode of LBP and followed-up for three months. Total plasma N-glycome was measured and compared at the baseline and follow-up. Results: Initial pro-inflammatory patterns of plasma N-glycome change to normal levels between baseline and follow-up in those who resolved from LBP, but not in those who remained at pain after three months. Baseline levels of N-glycans were not predictive of the risk of chronic LBP at follow-up. Conclusion: Total plasma N-glycan levels may reflect ongoing inflammation that is aberrant and promotes ongoing pain and chronicity of symptoms.

Competing Interest Statement

YSA and LCK are the founders and owners of PolyOmica and PolyKnomics, private organizations providing services, research, and development in the field of computational and statistical genomics. GL is the founder and owner of Genos Ltd., a private research organization that specializes in high-throughput glycomic analysis and has several patents in this field. IU, ITA, MV, AS, and TP are employees of Genos Ltd. Other authors declare no competing interests.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the European Commission FP7 PainOmics project (contract No. 602736). YAT and EEE were supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant # 22-15-20037 and the Government of the Novosibirsk region. YSA was partially supported by the budget project of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics # FWNR-2022-0020.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval has been obtained at each respective institution who carried out recruitment and sample collection: National Research Ethics Service Committee London - Westminster (London, UK); Comite Medische Ethiek van Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (Genk, Belgium); Comitato Etico per Parma (Parma, Italy); IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo (Pavia, Italy); Eticki odbor Specijalna bolnica Sv. Katarina (Zagreb, Croatia). Copies of approvals were provided to the European Commission before starting the study. All participants gave informed consent to take part in the study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif