Panser LA, Chute CG, Guess HA, Larsonkeller JJ, Girman CJ, Oesterling JE, et al. The natural history of prostatism: The effects of non-response bias. Int J Epidemiol. 1994;23:1198–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/23.6.1198.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cornu J, Gacci M, Hashim H, Herrmann T, Malde S, Netsch C, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non Neurogenic Male LUTS 2024. https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAU-Guidelines-on-Non-Neurogenic-Male-LUTS-2024.pdf. Accessed May 2024.

Nguyen ALV, Verma I, Ferreira R, Nguyen DD, Zorn KC, Bhojani N, et al. A scoping review of office-based prostatic stents: past, present, and future of true minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol. 2023;41:2925–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04508-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ebbing J, Bachmann A. Anesthesia-free procedures for benign prostate obstruction: Worth it. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25:32–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000123.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balakrishnan D, Jones P, Somani BK. iTIND: the second-generation temporary implantable nitinol device for minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Ther Adv Urol. 2020;25:1756287220934355 https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287220934355.

Article  Google Scholar 

Adam A, Jäger R, McLoughlin J, El-Din A, Machan L, Williams G, et al. Wallstent endoprostheses for the relief of prostatic urethral obstruction in high risk patients. Clin Radio. 1990;42:228–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(05)82108-7.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Qiu CY, Wang JM, Zhang ZX, Huang ZX, Zheng QY, du ZQ, et al. Stent of Shape-Memory Alloy for Urethral Obstruction Caused by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Endourol. 1994;8:65–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1994.8.65.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song HY, Cho KS, Sung KB, Han YM, Kim YG, Kim CS. Self-expandable metallic stents in high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1995;195:655–60. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.3.7538681.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mori K, Okamoto S, Akimoto M. Placement of the Urethral Stent Made of Shape Memory Alloy in Management of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy for Debilitated Patients. J Urol. 1995;154:1065–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sun Y, Wang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Yao Y. Evaluation of a tubular mesh and a spiral stent woven from titanium nickel alloy for prostatic obstruction in patients at high risk for surgery. Report of 62 cases. Chin Med J (Engl) 1995;108:769–73.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yip KH, Lee F, Lam PC, Ho KK. Urolume prostatic stents for urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with high medical risks. Hong Kong Med J 1997;3:136–40.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Anidjar M, Gaudez F, Saporta F, Daudon M, Cortesse A, et al. A new prostatic stent for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in high-risk patients. Eur Urol. 2000;38:272–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000020293.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perry MJA, Roodhouse AJ, Gidlow AB, Spicer TG, Ellis BW. Thermo-expandable intraprostatic stents in bladder outlet obstruction: An 8-year study. BJU Int. 2002;90:216–23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02888.x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grimsley SJS, Khan MH, Lennox E, Paterson PH. Experience with the spanner prostatic stent in patients unfit for surgery: An observational study. J Endourol. 2007;21:1093–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0254.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rouprêt M, Misraï V, De Fourmestraux A, Cour F, Richard F, Chartier-Kastler E. Clinical relevance of urethral stents (Urospiral 2TM) placement in patients with prostatic obstacle and concomitant high-risk surgical status or neurological diseases: A feasibility and safety study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:374–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20978.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim CS, Song HY, Jeong IG, Yeo HJ, Kim EY, Park JH, et al. Temporary placement of covered retrievable expandable nitinol stents with barbs in high-risk surgical patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Work in progress. J Vasc Inter Radio. 2011;22:1420–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2011.06.017.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bozkurt IH, Yalcinkaya F, Sertcelik MN, Zengin K, Ekici M, Yigitbasi O. A good alternative to indwelling catheter owing to benign prostate hyperplasia in elderly: Memotherm prostatic stent. Urology 2013;82:1004–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schou-Jensen KS, Dahl C, Azawi NH. Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate. Dan Med J 2014;61:A4937.

Google Scholar 

Kimata R, Nemoto K, Tomita Y, Takahashi R, Hamasaki T, Kondo Y. Efficacy of a thermoexpandable metallic prostate stent (Memokath) in elderly patients with urethral obstruction requiring long-term management with urethral Foley catheters. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15:553–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12309.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yildiz G, Bahouth Z, Halachmi S, Meyer G, Nativ O, Moskovitz B. AlliumTM TPS - A New Prostatic Stent for the Treatment of Patients with Benign Prostatic Obstruction: The First Report. J Endourol. 2016;30:319–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0593.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sethi K, Bozin M, Jabane T, McMullin R, Cook D, Forsyth R, et al. Thermo-expandable prostatic stents for bladder outlet obstruction in the frail and elderly population: An underutilized procedure. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58:447–52. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.447.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Nunzio C, Cantiello F, Fiori C, Crocerossa F, Tognoni P, Amparore D, et al. Urinary and sexual function after treatment with temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind) in men with LUTS: 6-month interim results of the MT-06-study. World J Urol. 2020;39:2037–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03418-2.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chughtai B, Elterman D, Shore N, Gittleman M, Motola J, Pike S, et al. The iTind Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Urology 2021;153:270–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaplan SA, Moss J, Freedman S, Coutinho K, Wu N, Efros M, et al. The PINNACLE Study: A Double-blind, Randomized, Sham-controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol. 2023;210:500–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003568.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shah DK, Kapoor R, Badlani GH. Experience with urethral stent explantation. J Urol. 2003;169:1398–400. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000049227.73112.3f.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masood S, Djaladat H, Kouriefs C, Keen M, Palmer JH. The 12-year outcome analysis of an endourethral wallstent for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2004;94:1271–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05155.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oesterling JE, Kaplan SA, Epstein HB, Defalco AJ, Reddy PK, Chancellor MB. The North American experience with the UroLume endoprosthesis as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: long-term results. The North American UroLume Study Group. Urology. 1994;44:353–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80093-6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams G, White R. Experience with the MemothermTM permanently implanted prostatic stent. Br J Urol. 1995;76:337–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07710.x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ricciotti G, Bozzo W, Perachino M, Pezzica C, Puppo P. Heat-Expansible Permanent Intraurethral Stents for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Urethral Strictures. J Endourol. 1995;9:417–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1995.9.417.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dahlstrand C, Grundtman S, Pettersson S. High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy for large severely obstructing prostates and the use of biodegradable stents to avoid catheterization after treatment. Br J Urol. 1997;79:907–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00186.x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pétas A, Talja M, Tammela TLJ, Taari K, Välimaa T, Törmälä P. The biodegradable self-reinforced poiy-DL-lactic acid spiral stent compared with a suprapubic catheter in the treatment of post-operative urinary retention after visual laser ablation of the prostate. Br J Urol. 1997;80:439–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00308.x.

Article