Wells S (2008) Venous access in oncology and haematology patients: part one. Nurs Stand 22(52):39

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ng F, Mastoroudes H, Paul E, Davies N, Tibballs J, Hochhauser D, Mayer A, Begent R, Meyer T (2007) A comparison of Hickman line-and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy. Clin Oncol 19(7):551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2007.04.003

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Goossens GA, Stas M, Jérôme M, Moons P (2011) Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 19(7):883–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1171-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cheong K, Perry D, Karapetis C, Koczwara B (2004) High rate of complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in patients with solid tumours. Intern Med J 34(5):234–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0903.2004.00447.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ullman AJ, Marsh N, Mihala G, Cooke M, Rickard CM (2015) Complications of central venous access devices: a systematic review. Pediatrics 136(5):e1331–e1344. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1507

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cotogni P, Mussa B, Degiorgis C, De Francesco A, Pittiruti M (2021) Comparative complication rates of 854 central venous access devices for home parenteral nutrition in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 169,000 catheter-days. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 45(4):768–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1939

Article  Google Scholar 

Akhtar N, Lee L (2021) Utilization and complications of central venous access devices in oncology patients. Curr Oncol 28(1):367–377. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010039

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chernecky C (2001) Satisfaction versus dissatisfaction with venous access devices in outpatient oncology: a pilot study. Oncol Nurs Forum 28(10):1613

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Broadhurst D, Moureau N, Ullman AJ (2017) Management of central venous access device-associated skin impairment: an evidence-based algorithm. J Wound Ostomy Continence 44(3):211. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000322

Article  Google Scholar 

Ivziku D, Gualandi R, Pesce F, De Benedictis A, Tartaglini D (2022) Adult oncology patients’ experiences of living with a central venous catheter: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Support Care Cancer 1–19:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06819-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Goossens GA, Vrebos M, Stas M, De Wever I, Frederickx L (2005) Central vascular access devices in oncology and hematology considered from a different point of view: how do patients experience their vascular access ports? J Infus Nurs 28(1):61–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129804-200501000-00008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu Y, Xu L, Jiang M, Chen B, Jing L, Zhang L, Su P, Jin F, Mao X (2020) Chinesization of the quality of life assessment, venous device-port, and its reliability and validity tests for patients with breast cancer. J Vasc Access 1129729820920528:1129729820920528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820920528

Article  Google Scholar 

Magnani C, Calvieri A, Giannarelli D, Espino M, Casale G (2019) Peripherally inserted central catheter, midline, and “short” midline in palliative care: patient-reported outcome measures to assess impact on quality of care. J Vasc Access 20(5):475–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729818814732

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Howell D, Fitch M, Bakker D, Green E, Sussman J, Mayo S, Mohammed S, Lee C, Doran D (2013) Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi Consensus. Value Health 16(1):76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tremblay D, Roberge D, Berbiche D (2015) Determinants of patient-reported experience of cancer services responsiveness. BMC Health Serv Res 15(1):425. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1104-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Terwee CB, Prinsen C, Ricci Garotti M, Suman A, De Vet H, Mokkink LB (2016) The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 25(4):767–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1122-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 63(7):737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Babu KG, Babu MS, Lokanatha D, Bhat GR (2016) Outcomes, cost comparison, and patient satisfaction during long-term central venous access in cancer patients: experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute in South India. IJMPO 37(4):232. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.195732

Article  Google Scholar 

Campbell WB, Elworthy S, Peerlinck I, Vanslembroek K, Bangur R, Stableforth D, Sheldon CD (2004) Sites of implantation for central venous access devices (Ports): a study of the experiences and preferences of patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28(6):642–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.002

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ilkaz N, Iyigun E (2020) Evaluation of central venous catheter location in terms of pain, comfort and patient satisfaction. Int J Caring Sci 13(1):424–430

Google Scholar 

Johansson E, Engervall P, Björvell H, Hast R, Björkholm M (2009) Patients’ perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia. Support Care Cancer 17(2):137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0449-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kunz-Virk J, Krüger K (2019) Power-injectable totally implantable venous access devices - analysis of success and complication rates of ultrasound-guided implantation and a patient satisfaction survey. Eur J Vasc Med 48(6):524–530. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000802

Article  Google Scholar 

Lilienberg A, Bengtsson M, Starkhammar H (1994) Implantable devices for venous access: nurses’ and patients’ evaluation of three different port systems. J Adv Nurs 19(1):21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01046.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McIntosh LA, Walker GM (2015) Patients’ experience of portacaths in cystic fibrosis: questionnaire-based study. Arch Dis Child 100(7):659–661. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-308045

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bortolussi R, Zotti P, Conte M, Marson R, Polesel J, Colussi A, Piazza D, Tabaro G, Spazzapan S (2015) Quality of life, pain perception, and distress correlated to ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central venous catheters in palliative care patients in a home or hospice setting. J Pain Symptom Manage 50(1):118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.02.027

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bow EJ, Kilpatrick MG, Clinch J (1999) Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: a randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 17(4):1267–1267

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burbridge B, Lim H, Dwernychuk L, Le H, Asif T, Sami A, Ahmed S (2021) Comparison of the quality of life of patients with breast or colon cancer with an arm vein port (TIVAD) versus a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Curr Oncol Rep 28(2):1495–1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28020141

Article  Google Scholar 

Ding Y, Ji L, Hu Y (2020) Effects of tai chi on catheter management and quality of life in tumor patients with PICC at the intermission of chemotherapy: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Ann Palliat Med 9(5):3293–3303. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-1456

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Maldifassi A, Radice D, Rotmensz N, Zampino MG, Fazio N, Peruzzotti G, Didier F, Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Maldifassi A, Radice D, Rotmensz N, Zampino MG, Fazio N, Peruzzotti G et al (2011) No impact of central venous insertion site on oncology patients’ quality of life and psychological distress. A randomized three-arm trial. Support Care Cancer 19(10):1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0984-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huisman-de Waal G, Versleijen M, van Achterberg T, Jansen JB, Sauerwein H, Schoonhoven L, Wanten G (2011) Psychosocial complaints are associated with venous access-device related complications in patients on home parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 35(5):588–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607110385818

Article  Google Scholar 

Kang J, Chen W, Sun W, Ge R, Li H, Ma E, Su Q, Cheng F, Hong J, Zhang Y, Lei C, Wang X, Jin A, Liu W (2017) Health-related quality of life of cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheter: a pilot study. J Vasc Access 18(5):396–441. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000762

Article  PubMed