Many clinical questions in medicine cannot be answered through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) due to ethical or feasibility constraints. In such cases, observational data is often the only available resource for evaluating treatment effects. To address this challenge, we have developed Decision Path Similarity Matching (DPSM), a novel machine learning (ML)-based algorithm that simulates RCT-like conditions to debias observational data. In this study, we apply DPSM to the clinical question of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) versus deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), helping to identify which patients benefit most from LDLT. DPSM leverages decision paths from a Random Forest classifier to perform accurate, one-to-one matching between LDLT and DDLT recipients, minimizing confounding while retaining interpretability. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), including 4,473 LDLT and 68,108 DDLT patients transplanted between 2002 and 2023, we trained independent Random Survival Forest (RSF) models on the matched cohorts to predict post-transplant survival. DPSM successfully reduced confounding associations between the two groups as shown by a decrease in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) from 0.82 to 0.51. Subsequently, RSF (C-index LDLT=0.67, C-index DDLT=0.74) outperformed the traditional Cox model (C-index LDLT=0.57, C-index DDLT=0.65). The predicted 10-year mean survival gain was 10.3% (SD = 5.7%). In conclusion, DPSM provides an effective approach for creating RCT-like comparability from observational data, enabling personalized survival predictions. By leveraging real-world data where RCTs are impractical, this method offers clinicians a tool for transitioning from population-level evidence to more nuanced, personalization.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University Health Network.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are publicly available through the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and available upon reasonable request to the authors. The source code for this work is available on GitHub.

https://github.com/Anivader/LDLT_survival_benefit_ML_tool