World health statistics 2023: monitoring health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. 2023, World Health Organisation: Geneva.

Zerna, C., J. Hegedus, and M.D. Hill, Evolving Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Circ Res, 2016. 118(9): p. 1425–42.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Toyoda, K., et al., Twenty-Year Change in Severity and Outcome of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes. JAMA Neurology, 2022. 79(1): p. 61–69.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mayor, S., Stroke strategy in England is improving acute care, shows audit. BMJ, 2010. 340: p. c687.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lynch, E., et al., Access to rehabilitation for patients with stroke in Australia. 2019.

National Office of Clinical Audit., Irish National Audit of Stroke: A critical review of national stroke data for Ireland from 2013 to 2021. 2023: Dublin

Tanne, D., S. Koton, and N.M. Bornstein, National Stroke Registries: What can we learn from them? Neurology, 2013. 81(14): p. 1257–1259.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Purvis, T., et al., Twenty years of monitoring acute stroke care in Australia through the national stroke audit programme (1999–2019): A cross-sectional study. 2023.

Smith, A., et al., Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) use in post-stroke patient care and clinical practice: a realist synthesis protocol. Systematic Reviews, 2021. 10(1): p. 128.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lebherz, L., et al., Implementability of collecting patient-reported outcome data in stroke unit care – a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 2022. 22(1): p. 346.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rudd, A.G., et al., 20 years of researching stroke through audit. 2018.

Cadilhac, D.A., et al., National stroke registries for monitoring and improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic review. Int J Stroke, 2016. 11(1): p. 28–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Parker, K.J., L.D. Hickman, and C. Ferguson, The science of clinical quality registries. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2023. 22(2): p. 220–225.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van der Werf, L.R., et al., Data verification of nationwide clinical quality registries. BJS Open, 2019. 3(6): p. 857–864.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Available from: https://www.base-search.net/.

Jonsson, A., et al. Reporting of Data Collection and Resourcing in National Stroke Audits: A Systematic Review. 2023; Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023393841.

Bruen, C., et al., Development of a national stroke audit in Ireland: scoping review protocol. 2021, F1000 Research Limited.

Page, M.J., et al., PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021. 372: p. n160.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thayabaranathan, T., et al., Global stroke statistics 2022. Int J Stroke, 2022. 17(9): p. 946–956.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Asplund, K., et al., The Riks-Stroke story: building a sustainable national register for quality assessment of stroke care. Int J Stroke, 2011. 6(2): p. 99–108.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McVey, L., et al., Hidden labour: the skilful work of clinical audit data collection and its implications for secondary use of data via integrated health IT. BMC Health Serv Res, 2021. 21(1): p. 702.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aked, J., et al., Completeness of case ascertainment in Swedish hospital-based stroke registers. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 2020. 141(2): p. 148–155.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hsieh, C.Y., D.P. Wu, and S.F. Sung, Registry-based stroke research in Taiwan: past and future. Epidemiol Health, 2018. 40: p. e2018004.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Reeves, M.J., et al., Assessment of the Completeness and Accuracy of Case Ascertainment in the Michigan Stroke Registry. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2014. 7(5): p. 757–763.

Johnson, B.J., et al., Abstract P241: Why Do We Expect Clinicians to Perform the Work of Computers? Developing an Automated Stroke Registry. Stroke, 2021. 52(Suppl_1): p. AP241-AP241.

Article  Google Scholar 

Robison, T., et al., Abstract TP364: Optimization of Data Abstraction and Quality Measure Reporting using EHR. Stroke, 2018. 49(Suppl_1): p. ATP364-ATP364.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lazem, M. and A. Sheikhtaheri, Barriers and facilitators for disease registry systems: a mixed-method study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2022. 22(1): p. 97.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lynch, E., et al., ‘The way that we are collecting and using data has evolved’ evaluating the Australian National Stroke Audit programme to inform strategic direction. BMJ Open Quality, 2023. 12(1): p. e002136.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Reeves, M. J., et. al. Twenty years of get with the guidelines-stroke: celebrating past successes, lessons learned, and future challenges. Stroke. 2024;55(6):1689–98. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046527.

Eliakundu, A.L., et al., Linking Data From the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry With Ambulance and Emergency Administrative Data in Victoria. Inquiry, 2022. 59: p. 469580221102200.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simonsen, S.A., et al., Evaluation of pre-hospital transport time of stroke patients to thrombolytic treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2014. 22(1): p. 65.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fladt, J., et al., Optimizing Patient-Centered Stroke Care and Research in the Prehospital Setting. Stroke, 2023. 54(9): p. 2453–2460.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gliklich RE, D.N., Leavy MB, editors, Data Sources for Registries, in Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide [Internet]. 2014, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville (MD).

Ung, D., et al., Promising Use of Big Data to Increase the Efficiency and Comprehensiveness of Stroke Outcomes Research. Stroke, 2019. 50(5): p. 1302–1309.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang, K., et al., Review of response rates over time in registry-based studies using patient-reported outcome measures. BMJ Open, 2020. 10(8): p. e030808.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barclay-Moss, K.M., et al., Stroke survivor follow-up in a national registry: Lessons learnt from respondents who completed telephone interviews. International Journal of Stroke, 2019. 14(2): p. 112–114.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Imam, M.A., et al., Loss to follow-up after total hip replacement: a source of bias in patient reported outcome measures and registry datasets? HIP International, 2014. 24(5): p. 465–472.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lannin, N.A., et al., Telephone follow-up was more expensive but more efficient than postal in a national stroke registry. 2013.

Tu, J.V., et al., Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. N Engl J Med, 2004. 350(14): p. 1414–21.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lübbeke, A., A.J. Carr, and P. Hoffmeyer, Registry stakeholders. EFORT Open Rev, 2019. 4(6): p. 330–336.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

England, N., 2023/25 NHS Payment Scheme – a consultation notice Annex DpC: Guidance on best practice tariffs 2022: London, UK.

Grimley, R.S., et al., Impact of pay-for-performance for stroke unit access on mortality in Queensland, Australia: an interrupted time series analysis. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 2023. 41: p. 100921.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ödesjö, H., et al., Short-term effects of a pay-for-performance programme for diabetes in a primary care setting: an observational study. Scand J Prim Health Care, 2015. 33(4): p. 291–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Varmdal, T., et al., Inter-rater reliability of a national acute stroke register. BMC Res Notes, 2015. 8: p. 584.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Arts, D.G., N.F. De Keizer, and G.J. Scheffer, Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2002. 9(6): p. 600–11.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central