Effect of comprehensive medication management on mortality in critically ill patients

Abstract

Background: Medication management in the intensive care unit (ICU) is causally linked to both treatment success and potential adverse drug events (ADEs), often associated with deleterious consequences. Patients with higher severity of illness tend to require more management. The purpose of this evaluation was to explore the effect of comprehensive medication management (CMM) on mortality in critically ill patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of adult ICU patients, CMM was measured by critical care pharmacist (CCP) medication interventions. Propensity score matching was performed to generate a balanced 1:1 matched cohort, and logistic regression was applied for estimating propensity scores. The primary outcome was the odds of hospital mortality. Hospital and ICU length of stay were also assessed. Results: In a cohort of 10,441 ICU patients, the unadjusted mortality rate was 11% with a mean APACHE II score of 9.54 and Medication Regimen Complexity-Intensive Care Unit (MRC-ICU) score of 5.78. Compared with CCP interventions less than 3, more CCP interventions was associated with a significantly reduced risk of mortality (estimate -0.04, 95% confidence interval -0.06 - -0.03, p < 0.01) and shorter length of ICU stay (estimate -2.77, 95% CI -2.98 - - 2.56, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The degree by which CCPs deliver CMM in the ICU is directly associated with reduced hospital mortality independent of patient characteristics and medication regimen complexity.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding through Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality for Drs. Devlin, Murphy, Sikora, Smith, Shen, Li, Liu, and Kamaleswaran was provided through R21HS028485 and R01HS029009.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was reviewed by the University of Georgia (UGA) Institutional Review Board (IRB) and determined to be exempt from IRB oversight (Project00001541). All methods were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the UGA IRB and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif