Introduction: Military exposure summarization is critical for Veterans with complex environmental, occupational, or toxic exposures. Existing methods are limited by technical language, incompatible data formats, and difficulty in prioritizing information. Clinicians require concise, standardized, and easily interpretable exposure summaries to facilitate rapid assessment. This report is part of a broader programmatic effort to collate military exposure information from established, as well as new sources of data to improve VA exposure-informed healthcare. Methods: In a collaborative effort, VA clinicians from multiple specialties participated in a structured clinical needs assessment interview to identify the most clinically useful information to be included in the Health Exposure Records and Occupations (HERO) summary. The interviews covered summary length, exposure prioritization, demographics, military occupational history, features characterizing exposure, resilience factors, health outcomes, and impact on clinical practice. Results: Consensus recommendations prescribed a concise summary with clear language, basic military demographics, and critical military exposures that prioritize exposures that require further investigation. Based on recommendations, the HERO summary also includes types of exposure, proximity, route, symptoms at the time of exposure, exposure period, duration, frequency, and protective controls used. Conclusion: This perspective piece not only assesses the clinical need for exposure summarization and the optimal format for the HERO summary, but also highlights its potential impact. The HERO summary, as a tool, offers improved time efficiency, consistency in exposure-informed care across the VA, enhances communication between Veterans and providers, and improves understanding of the association between military exposures and health outcomes, potentially transforming the VA healthcare system.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Only mock data is used in this report

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Only mock data is used in this perspective report