Comparison of Frequently Used Fever Measurement Methods: Which One is the Best?

  SFX Search  Buy Article Permissions and Reprints Abstract

Objective Peripheral measurement sites and methods used to determine core body temperature were investigated, as there is still debate about which noninvasive core body temperature measurement method is the most valuable and accurate for each age group.

Methods Children aged 1 to 36 months were included in the study. The temperature was measured from the forehead (noncontact cutaneous), temporal artery (TA), axilla, and rectum. The rectal measurement was accepted as the reference measurement. A rectal temperature of ≥38.3°C was defined as fever.

Results The noncontact cutaneous, axillary, and TA measurements were 1.2, 1.1, and 0.7°C lower than rectal measurements, respectively (p < 0.001, <0.001, <0.001). The TA and noncontact cutaneous measurements demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with rectal measurements, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen between the axillary and rectal measurements. A cutaneous temperature of 37.8°C was found to have a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 81%, sensitivity of 34%, and specificity of 100% for detecting fever. The respective values were 80, 79.4, 23.5, and 98% for an axillary temperature of 37.5°C, and 90, 86.2, 52.9, and 98% for a TA temperature of 38°C.

Conclusion The commonly used fever measurement methods have high PPV and NPV and specificity but low sensitivity.

Keywords fever - forehead - temporal artery - axilla - rectum Authors' Contribution

G.İ.B. designed the study; C.A., G.İ.B. collected and analyzed data; C.A., G.İ.B. wrote the manuscript; C.A., G.İ.B. gave technical support and conceptual advice.


Publication History

Received: 16 December 2023

Accepted: 06 August 2024

Article published online:
01 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif