Kern JS, Kern T, Wolfart S, Heussen N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):174–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Awad MA, Rashid F, Feine JS, Allen F, Heydecke G, Mojon P, et al. The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(1):46–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harris D, Höfer S, O’Boyle CA, Sheridan S, Marley J, Benington IC, et al. A comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life in edentulous patients: a randomized, prospective, within-subject controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;24(1):96–103.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(1):78–9.

Google Scholar 

Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Müller F, Naert I, et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients - the York Consensus Statement. BDJ. 2009;207(4):185–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Youssef HG. Masticatory Efficiency and Maximum Bite Force of patients using two- Implant Mandibular overdentures Retained by Equator or Locator attachments: a crossover study. Adv Dent J. 2022;4(4):322–38.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sayed S, Hassan M, Hossam M, Helmy ED. Implant supported mandibular overdentures with locator attachments in patients with resorbed mandibular ridges. A cross over study of patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life. Egypt Dent J. 2020;66:671–81. Issue 1-January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)).

Article  Google Scholar 

Ates G, Bilhan H, Sulun T, Dayan S, Geckili O, Tuncer N. Comparative evaluation of Survival Rates and marginal bone levels of Nonsplinted immediately loaded Interforaminal Mandibular Implant-retained overdentures: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with 5-Year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023;38(5):954–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, DeLlanos-Lanchares H, Brizuela-Velasco A, Martin-Fernandez E, Ellacuria-Echebarria J. Influence of Implant positions and Occlusal forces on Peri-implant Bone stress in Mandibular two-Implant overdentures: a 3-Dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43(6):419–28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee CK, Agar JR. Surgical and prosthetic planning for a two-implant–retained mandibular overdenture: a clinical report. 95, J Prosthet Dent. 2006.

Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(5):e69–76.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elsyad MA, Ashmawy TM, Faramawy AG. The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(1):69–77.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alsabeeha NHM, Rcps M, Payne AGT, Swain MV. Attachment systems for Mandibular two-Implant overdentures: a review of in Vitro investigations on Retention and wear features. 2009;22(5).

Chaware S, Thakkar S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the attachments used in implant-supported overdentures. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(3):255–68.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2006;15(1):24–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

MacHado ACM, Cardoso L, Brandt WC, Henriques GEP, De Arruda Nóbilo MA. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(6):2332–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bansal S, Aras M, Chitre V. Guidelines for treatment planning of mandibular implant overdenture. J Dent Implants. 2014;4(1):86.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen J, Ahmad R, Suenaga H, Li W, Swain M, Li Q. A comparative study on complete and implant retained denture treatments – A biomechanics perspective. J Biomech. 2015;48(3):512–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Assunção WG, Tabata LF, Barão VAR, Rocha EP. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(10):766–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Brandão ML, Vettore MV, Vidigal Júnior GM. Peri-implant bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(3):287–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Benhamida SA, El Maroush MA, Elgendy AA, Elsaltani MH. Residual ridge resorption, the effect on prosthodontics management of edentulous patient: an article review. Int J Sci Res Manage. 2019;7(09).

Mourad KE, Emera RMK, Ahmed W, Habib A. Lateral incisors versus canine areas for two implant placements used to retain mandibular overdenture: periodic monitoring of ridge base contact relation. J Dent Implants. 2020;10(2):72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sawada A, Wakabayashi N, Ona M, Suzuki T. Viscoelasticity of human oral mucosa: implications for masticatory biomechanics. J Dent Res. 2011;90(5):590–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yadav D, Ms R, Shailaja AM, Anand D, Sood N, Gothi R. Angle’s molar classification revisited. jp-journals. 2014;10021–1282.

Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008;53 Suppl 1(SUPPL. 1).

Elsyad MA, Khirallah AS. Circumferential bone loss around splinted and nonsplinted immediately loaded implants retaining mandibular overdentures: a randomized controlled clinical trial using cone beam computed tomography. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(5):741–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schuster AJ, da Rosa Possebon AP, Schinestsck AR, Chagas-Júnior OL, Faot F. Circumferential bone level and bone remodeling in the posterior mandible of edentulous mandibular overdenture wearers: influence of mandibular bone atrophy in a 3-year cohort study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(3):3119–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raes F, Renckens L, Aps J, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(5):661–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shiratori LN, Marotti J, Yamanouchi J, Chilvarquer I, Contin I, Tortamano-Neto P. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(7):797–804.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Turker N, Buyukkaplan US. Effects of overdenture attachment systems with different working principles on stress transmission: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(6):351.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Geertman ME, Boerrigter EM, Van Waas MAJ, Van Oort RP. Clinical aspects of a multicenter clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures in patients with severely resorbed mandibles. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(2):194–204.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK, Beck DA. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: part I—retention, stability, and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(4):354–63.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taylor TD. Indications and treatment planning for mandibular implant overdentures. In: Feine JS, Carlsson GE, editors. Implant over dentures as the Standard of Care for Edentulous patients. Chicago: Quintessence; 2003. pp. 71–81.

Google Scholar 

Ajaj Al-Kordy NMT, Al-Saadi MH. Finite element study of stress distribution with tooth-supported Mandibular Overdenture retained by ball attachments or resilient telescopic crowns. Eur J Dent. 2023;17(2):539–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Torresin A, de las Heras Gala H, Dasu A, Andersson J, Caprile P, Darréon J, et al. SP-0689: CBCT QA: European guidelines by EFOMP-ESTRO-IAEA. Radiother Oncol. 2018;127:S360–1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mourad KE, Altonbary GY, Emera RMK, Hegazy SAF. Polyetheretherketone computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing framework for all-on-four mandibular full-arch prosthesis: 3 years’ retrospective study of peri-implant soft tissue changes and ridge base relationship. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(7):579–87.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stricker A, Jacobs R, Maes F, Fluegge T, Vach K, Fleiner J. Resorption of retromolar bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation—volumetric changes after 12 months assessed by CBCT analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):1–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornstein MM, Horner K, Jacobs R. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):51–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu J, Pan S, Dong J, Mo Z, Fan Y, Feng H. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent. 2013;41(3):241–9.

Article  PubMed