Spine pain is a prevalent and costly condition affecting up to 85% of individuals throughout their lifetime, and spinal stenosis is one of the most debilitating sources of spine pain. Although conservative management is the first line of treatment for spinal stenosis, severe cases often are directly referred to surgical intervention due to the belief that conservative strategies delay necessary treatment. However, there are no studies supporting the premise that individuals with more severe stenosis respond poorly to conservative management. The purpose of this study was to compare improvements in pain, disability, strength, medication usage, and patient goals in response to an exercise-based physical therapy program across 1,806 individuals with mild, moderate, or severe lumbar spine stenosis. Participants demonstrated significant improvements in all variables of interest (p<0.001), and 11.5% of participants reported cessation of narcotic use with treatment. There were no significant differences in treatment response across mild, moderate, or severe stenosis groups for any outcome (p>0.546). Exercise-based rehabilitation is as beneficial in the short term for individuals presenting for nonoperative care with severe stenosis compared to their milder counterparts. Future research is needed to evaluate long term durability and cost effectiveness of rehabilitation in this patient population.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

NCT #04081896

This study was funded in part by Foundation for Physical Therapy Research Magistro Family Foundation and NIH R01 HD100446 awarded to BS.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Western Institutional Review Board gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.