Linguistic Dynamics: Women vs. the General Population in Reddit's ADHD Discussions

Abstract

Understanding how language reflects the experiences of individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is important for developing targeted support strategies. This research investigates the linguistic patterns exhibited in discussions within women-centric and general ADHD population on Reddit, exploring how gender influences language use. By analyzing language, the study uncovers unique linguistic patterns and illuminates how women with ADHD express themselves, share experiences, and seek support compared to the general ADHD population. By leveraging deep learning-based embedding, clustering and named entity recognition, the study conducts a comprehensive analysis. Results reveal that women with ADHD emphasize themes like "ADHD Awareness and Diagnosis" and "Emotional Well-being". Conversely, the general population highlights "Medication and Treatment", and "Work and Academic Challenges". Statistical tests confirm significant differences in both linguistics and emotional expression between the two groups, emphasizing the importance of gender considerations in understanding ADHD language nuances and tailoring interventions accordingly.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at Reddit platform.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif