Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete Edition. Longman.

Basol, G., & Johanson, G. (2009). Effectiveness of frequent exams over achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(2), 99–121. https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/757

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay.

Boyce, T. E., & Hineline, P. N. (2002). Interteaching: A strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom. The Behavior Analyst, 25(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392059

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., Cook, M. J., & Dihoff, R. E. (2005). Efficacy of error for the correction of initially incorrect assumptions and of feedback for the affirmation of correct responding: Learning in the classroom. The Psychological Record, 55(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395518

Article  Google Scholar 

Brown, T. W., Killingsworth, K., & Alavosius, M. P. (2014). Interteaching: An evidence-based approach to instruction. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 132–139. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1043034

Byrne, B., & Guy, R. (2016). Interteaching within a human physiology course: A comparison of first and second-year students’ learning skills and perceptions. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(3), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00141.2015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cannella-Malone, H. I., Axe, J. B., & Parker, E. D. (2009). Interteach preparation: A comparison of the effects of answering versus generating study guide questions on quiz scores. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 9(2), 22–35. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854891.Pdf

Chester, A., Kienhuis, M., & Wilson, P. (2015). Implementation of the interteaching model: Implications for staff. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 52(3), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.845536

Article  Google Scholar 

Contreras, B. P., Dovgan, K., Johnson, K., & Kahng, S. (2020). Comparing student-created to teacher-created study guides within an interteaching framework. Teaching of Psychology, 48(4), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979864

Article  Google Scholar 

Curiel, E. S. L., Kranak, M. P., Fielding, C., Curiel, H., & Miller, M. M. (2022). Behavior analysis in college classrooms: A scoping review. Behavioral Interventions, 38(1), 219–254. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3201_4

Article  Google Scholar 

Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395471

Article  Google Scholar 

Dumulescu, D., Pop-Pacurar, I., & Necula, C. V. (2021). Learning design for future higher education: Insights from the time of COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647948

Article  Google Scholar 

Dunn, D. S., Saville, B. K., Baker, S. C., & Marek, P. (2013). Evidence-based teaching: Tools and techniques that promote learning in the psychology classroom. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12004

Article  Google Scholar 

Felderman, T. A. (2014). Preliminary analysis of interteaching’s frequent examinations component in the community college classroom. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 11(4), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v11i4.8851

Felderman, T. A. (2016). A systematic replication comparing interteaching and lecture in the community college classroom. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 40(9), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1075445

Article  Google Scholar 

Filipiak, S., Anne Rehfeldt, R., Heal, N. A., & Baker, J. C. (2010). The effects of points for preparation guides in interteaching procedures. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2010.11434338

Article  Google Scholar 

Garcia, Y. A., Orozco, L., & Martin, G. (2016). Comparación de dos procedimientos de enseñanza universitaria: Un ejemplo de interteaching. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 20(3), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3539/2015/02031029

Article  Google Scholar 

Gayman, C. M., Hammonds, F., & Rost, K. A. (2018). Interteaching in an asynchronous online class. Scholarship of Teaching & Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000126

Article  Google Scholar 

Gayman, C. M., & Jimenez, S. (2020). Varying the preparation guide and group discussion in a classroom analysis of interteaching. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i2.26120

Gayman, C. M., Jimenez, S., Hammock, S., Taylor, G., & Rocheleau, J. M. (2023a). The effects of cumulative and noncumulative exams within the context of interteaching. Journal of Behavioral Education, 32, 261–276. (Original work published 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09451-4

Gayman, C. M., Jimenez, S., Rocheleau, J. M., Hammock, S., & Park, G. (2024). An evaluation of the discussion component of interteaching in an asynchronous online class. The Psychological Record, 74, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00589-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Gayman, C. M., Rost, K. A., & Jimenez, S. (2023b). A comparison of interteaching, lecture-based teaching, and lecture-based teaching with optional preparation guides in an asynchronous online classroom. Scholarship of Teaching & Learning in Psychology, 9(1), 1–13. (Original work published 2020). https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000234

Goto, K., & Schneider, J. (2009). Interteaching: An innovative approach to facilitate university student learning in the field of nutrition. Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior, 41(4), 303–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2009.02.003

Article  Google Scholar 

Goto, K., & Schneider, J. (2010). Learning through teaching: Challenges and opportunities in facilitating student learning in food science and nutrition by using the interteaching approach. Journal of Food Science Education, 9(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2009.00087.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Hurtado-Parrado, C., Pfaller-Sadovsky, N., Medina, L., Gayman, C. M., Rost, K. A., & Schofill, D. (2022). A systematic review and quantitative analysis of interteaching. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31, 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09452-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jimenez, S. T., & Gayman, C. M. (2021). Interteaching: How much does each component increase its efficacy? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(4), 1503–1513. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.848

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jones, J. S. (2019). The interteaching approach: Enhancing participation and critical thinking. In A. Elçi, L. Beith, & A. Elçi (Eds.), Handbook of research on faculty development for digital teaching and learning (pp. 264–286). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8476-6.ch014

Kennedy, M. J., Alves, K. D., & Rodgers, W. J. (2015). Innovations in the delivery of content knowledge in special education teacher preparation. Intervention in School & Clinic, 51(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451215579268

Article  Google Scholar 

Kienhuis, M., & Chester, A. (2014). Interteaching: A model to enhance student engagement. In M. Gosper & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Curriculum models for the 21st century: Using technologies in higher education (pp. 135–153). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7366-4_8

Krebs, C. A., Kuhn, S. A. C., Brewer, A. T., & Diller, J. W. (2023). Using interteaching to promote online learning. Journal of Behavior Education, 32, 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09434-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Lambert, T., & Saville, B. K. (2012). Interteaching and the testing effect: A preliminary analysis. Teaching of Psychology,39(3), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312450435

Article  Google Scholar 

Latimier, A., Peyre, H., & Ramus, F. (2021). A meta-analytic review of the benefit of spacing out retrieval practice episodes on retention. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 959–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09572-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Lohmann, M. J., Randolph, K. M., & Oh, J. H. (2021). Classroom management strategies for hyflex instruction: Setting students up for success in the hybrid environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 807–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01201-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mayfield, K. H., & Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-105

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Digest of Education Statistics. U. S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_311.15.asp

Neuwirth, L. S., Jović, S., & Mukherji, B. R. (2021). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 27(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971420947738

Article  Google Scholar 

Neville Miller, A., Sellnow, D. D., & Strawser, M. G. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: Instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Communication Education, 70(2), 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418

Article  Google Scholar 

Querol, B. I. D., Rosales, R., & Soldner, J. L. (2015). A comprehensive review of interteaching and its impact on student learning and satisfaction. Scholarship of Teaching & Learning in Psychology, 1(4), 390–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000048

Article  Google Scholar 

Rieken, C. J., Dotson, W. H., Carter, S. L., & Griffith, A. K. (2018). An evaluation of interteaching in an asynchronous online graduate-level behavior analysis course. Teaching of Psychology, 45(3), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318779275

Article  Google Scholar 

Rosales, R., & Soldner, J. L. (2018). An assessment of group size in interteaching. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 18(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i2.22539

Rosales, R., Soldner, J. L., & Crimando, W. (2014). Enhancing the impact of quality points in interteaching. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 14(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotlv14i5.12746

Rosales, R., Soldner, J. L., & Zhang, L. (2018). An evaluation of the pair discussion component of interteaching. The Psychological Record, 68(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/40732-018-0269-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Saville, B. K. (2011). Interteaching: A behavior-analytic approach to promoting student engagement. In R. L. Miller, E. Amsel, B. Marsteller Kowalewski, B. C. Beins, K. D. Keith, & B. F. Peden (Eds.), Promoting student engagement (Vol 1): Programs, techniques, and opportunities. (pp. 128–133). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.

Saville, B. K. (2013). Interteaching: Ten tips for effective implementation. APS Observer, 26. Retrieved from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/interteaching-ten-tips-for-effective-implementation

Saville, B. K., Bureau, A., Eckenrode, C., Fullerton, A., Herbert, R., Maley, M., & Zombakis, J. (2014). Interteaching and lecture: A comparison of long-term recognition memory. Teaching of Psychology, 41(4), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314549704

Article