HLA evolutionary divergence (HED), a continuous metric quantifying the differences between each amino acid of two homologous HLA alleles, reflects the importance of the immunopeptidome presented to T lymphocytes. It has been associated with rejection after liver transplantation. This retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze the potential effect of donor or recipient HED on liver transplant rejection in a new series of patients transplanted during childhood and followed in adulthood. The study included 120 children who had been transplanted between 1991 and 2010 and were followed by routine biopsies and histological evaluations with a median of 14.1 years post-LT. Liver biopsies were performed routinely 1, 5, 10 and 20 years after transplantation and in the event of liver dysfunction. HED was calculated using the physicochemical Grantham distance for donor and recipient class I (HLA-A, -B, -C) and class II (HLA-DRB1, -DQB1) alleles. The influence of HED on rejection was analyzed by means of IPW and target trial emulation using g methods. Based on the IPW score, donor HED class I was correlated with the occurrence of late (>90 days) rejection (HR, 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01-1.40) independently of HLA mismatches, donor age and initial induction. This emulated target trial confirmed that donor HED class I has a causal effect on liver graft rejection and this relationship was observed long-term.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.It was approved by the Scientific and Ethical Committee of Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors