Prostate volume on computed tomography correlates well with magnetic resonance imaging measurements and is reproducible across rater training levels

Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ et al (2021) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART II—surgical evaluation and treatment. J Urol 206(4):818–826. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002184

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC et al (2016) Minimally invasive prostate convective water vapor energy ablation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 195(5):1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.181

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roehrborn CG, Barkin J, Gange SN et al (2017) Five year results of the prospective randomized controlled prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study. Can J Urol 24(3):8802–8813

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roehrborn CG, Gange SN, Gittelman MC et al (2017) Convective thermal therapy: durable 2-year results of randomized controlled and prospective crossover studies for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 197(6):1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.045

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ou R, You M, Tang P, Chen H, Deng X, Xie K (2010) A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL. Urology 76(4):958–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.079

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xie J, Tan Y, Wang F et al (2014) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy (Madigan) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia greater than 80 ml: complications and functional outcomes after 3-year follow-up. J Endourol 28(3):353–359. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0374

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li J, Cao D, Peng L et al (2019) Comparison between minimally invasive simple prostatectomy and open simple prostatectomy for large prostates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials. J Endourol 33(9):767–776. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0306

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elshal AM, Soltan M, El-Tabey NA, Laymon M, Nabeeh A (2020) Randomised trial of bipolar resection vs holmium laser enucleation vs Greenlight laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate for treatment of large benign prostate obstruction: 3-years outcomes. BJU Int 126(6):731–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15161

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Habib EI, ElSheemy MS, Hossam A et al (2021) Holmium laser enucleation versus bipolar plasmakinetic resection for management of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized-controlled trial. J Endourol 35(2):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0636

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jhanwar A, Sinha RJ, Bansal A, Prakash G, Singh K, Singh V (2017) Outcomes of transurethral resection and holmium laser enucleation in more than 60 g of prostate: a prospective randomized study. Urol Ann 9(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.198904

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ahmed S, Sanghvi K, Yeo D (2020) Telemedicine takes centre stage during COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Innov 6(4):252–254. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2020-000440

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dubin JM, Wyant WA, Balaji NC et al (2020) Telemedicine usage among urologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 22(11):e21875. https://doi.org/10.2196/21875

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Roehrborn CG, McConnell J, Bonilla J et al (2000) Serum prostate specific antigen is a strong predictor of future prostate growth in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. PROSCAR long-term efficacy and safety study. J Urol 163(1):13–20

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paterson NR, Lavallée LT, Nguyen LN et al (2016) Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens. J Can Urol Assoc 10(7–8):264–268. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3236

Article  Google Scholar 

Hoffelt SC, Marshall LM, Garzotto M, Hung A, Holland J, Beer TM (2003) A comparison of CT scan to transrectal ultrasound-measured prostate volume in untreated prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57(1):29–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00509-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ray Badiozamani K, Wallner K, Cavanagh W, Blasko J (1999) PII S0360-3016(98)00418-0 clinical investigation prostate comparability of CT-based and trus-based prostate volumes

Wasserman NF, Niendorf E, Spilseth B (2020) Measurement of prostate volume with MRI (a guide for the perplexed): biproximate method with analysis of precision and accuracy. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57046-x

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Giavarina D (2015) Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med 25(2):141–151. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.015

Article  Google Scholar 

Garvey B, Türkbey B, Truong H, Bernardo M, Periaswamy S, Choyke PL (2014) Clinical value of prostate segmentation and volume determination on MRI in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagn Interv Radiol 20(3):229–233. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2014.13322

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Okhunov Z, Helmy M, Perez-Lansac A et al (2013) Interobserver reliability and reproducibility of s.T.o.N.e. nephrolithometry for renal calculi. J Endourol 27(10):1303–1306. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0289

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif