Chien P. Global rising rates of caesarean sections. BJOG. 2021;128(5):781–2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Post cesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:81–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):33–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhatia M, Banerjee K, Dixit P, Dwivedi LK. Assessment of variation in cesarean delivery rates between public and private health facilities in India From 2005 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2015022.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: ametaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):621.e1-10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kawakita T, Landy HJ. Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment. Matern Health Neonatol Perinato. 2017;3:12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Huppelschoten AG, van Ginderen JC, van den Broek KC, Bouwma AE, Oosterbaan HP. Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(8):916–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scheck SM, Blackmore T, Maharaj D, Langdana F, Elder RE. Caesarean section wound infection surveillance: information for action. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(5):518–24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zejnullahu VA, Isjanovska R, Sejfija Z, Zejnullahu VA. Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, microbiological profile and risk factors. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):752.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tierney N, La Coursiere DY, Hebert S, Kelly TF, Lukacz ES. Incidence of wound complications after cesarean delivery: Is suture closure better? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(16):1992–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tully L, Gates S, Brocklehurst P, McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayers S. Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102(2):120–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11(11):CD003577.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Poprzeczny AJ, Grivell RM, Louise J, Deussen AR, Dodd JM. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):606.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(4):490.e1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.012.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buresch AM, Van Arsdale A, Ferzli M, Sahasrabudhe N, Sun M, Bernstein J, Bernstein PS, Ngai IM, Garry DJ. Comparison of subcuticular suture type for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):521–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koroglu N, Temel Yuksel I, Aslan Cetin B, Aytufan Z, Deniz N, Akca A, Yetkin Yildirim G, Yuksel A. Skin closure at cesarean section, polypropylene versus polyglactin910: a randomized controlled study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;30:1–5.

Google Scholar 

Uikey PA, Jagne M, Khandale SN. Study and compare the efficacy of 2 suture materials: poliglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 as subcuticular skin stitches in women undergoing elective cesarean section. Int J Sci Stud. 2017;5(4):237–43.

Google Scholar 

Bailey IS, Karran SE, Toyn K, Brough P, Ranaboldo C, Karran SJ. Communitysurveillance of complications after hernia surgery. BMJ. 1992;304(6825):469–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abd Elaal NK, Ellakwa HE, Elhalaby AF, Shaheen AE, Aish AH. Scalpel versus diathermy skin incision in Caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(3):340–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1527298. (Epub 2019 Jan 11 PMID: 30634889).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(3):e088.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sharma C, Verma A, Soni A, Thusoo M, Mahajan VK, Verma S. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with “staples” or “subcuticular sutures” in emergency cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(4):655–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ikeako L, Iloghalu E, Dim C, Adiuku-Brown A, Ezegwui H, Oranusi C. Comparing subcuticular sutures versus percutaneous staples for skin closure after caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled study. BJMMR. 2016;18(4):1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fitzwater JL, Jauk VC, Figueroa D, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Tita AT. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status. J Matern FetalNeonatalMed. 2016;29(2):279–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Al-Kadri H, Elsherif E, Khan L, Fillimban HM, Kurdi SF, Fayed AA, Qureshi S. A comparison of subcuticular and staples in closure techniques for Caesarian Section: a randomized controlled trial in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City RiyadhSaudi Arabia. Int Res JMedMedSci. 2018;10:30918.

Google Scholar 

Cooper SM, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Tita ATN. Does time of wound complication after cesarean delivery differ by type of skin closure? Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(9):981–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nayak GB, Saha PK, Bagga R, Joshi B, Rohilla M, Gainder S, Sikka P. Wound complication among different skin closure techniques in the emergency caesarean section: a randomized control trial. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(1):27–34.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(5):378–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdus-Salam RA, Bello FA, Olayemi O. A randomized study comparing skin staples with subcuticular sutures for wound closure at caesarean section in black-skinned women. IntSchRes Notices. 2014;2014:807937.

Google Scholar