Decreased cardio-respiratory information transfer is associated with deterioration and a poor prognosis in critically ill patients with sepsis

Abstract

Assessing illness severity in the ICU is crucial for early prediction of deterioration and prognosis. Traditional prognostic scores often treat organ systems separately, overlooking the body's interconnected nature. Network physiology offers a new approach to understanding these complex interactions. This study used the concept of transfer entropy (TE) to measure information flow between heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) in critically ill sepsis patients, hypothesizing that TE between these signals would correlate with disease outcome. The retrospective cohort study utilized the MIMIC III Clinical Database, including patients who met Sepsis-3 criteria on admission and had 30 minutes of continuous HR, RR, and SpO2 data. TE between the signals was calculated to create physiological network maps. Cox regression assessed the relationship between cardiorespiratory network indices and both deterioration (SOFA score increase of ≥2 points at 48 hours) and 30-day mortality. Among 164 patients, higher information flow from SpO2 to HR [TE(SpO2 → HR)] and reciprocal flow between HR and RR [TE(RR → HR) and TE(HR → RR)] were linked to reduced mortality, independent of age, mechanical ventilation, SOFA score, and comorbidity. Reductions in TE(HR → RR), TE(RR → HR), TE(SpO2 → RR), and TE(SpO2 → HR) were associated with increased risk of 48-hour deterioration. After adjustment for potential confounders, only TE(HR → RR) and TE(RR → HR) remained statistically significant. The study confirmed that physiological network mapping using routine signals in sepsis patients could indicate illness severity and that higher TE values were generally associated with improved outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Institutional Review Boards of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (IRB protocol nos. 2001P001699/14 and 0403000206).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif