Upfront Definitive Oncoplastic Breast Conservation Surgery in Biopsy Missed Cancers: Our Experience

Chakrabarthi S (2021) Stereotactic breast biopsy: A review & applicability in the Indian context. Indian J Med Res 154(2):237–247. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1815_20

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

O’Flynn EA, Wilson AR, Michell MJ (2010) Image-guided breast biopsy: State-of-the-art. Clin Radiol 65(4):259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.008

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, Gatsonis CA, Berg WA, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Page DL, McNeil BJ (2004) Radiologist investigators of the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol. 11(3):293–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00510-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krischer B, Forte S, Singer G, Kubik-Huch RA, Leo C (2020) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ: Residual microcalcifications and intraoperative findings. Breast Care (Basel) 15(4):386–391. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502944

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ho CP, Gillis JE (2022) Best practice approaches to breast radiology–pathology correlation and management. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 14:47–52

Article  Google Scholar 

Bong TSH, Tan JKT, Ho JTS, Tan PH et al (2022) Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast on core needle biopsy: risk of malignant upgrade on surgical excision. J Breast Cancer 25(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pandelidis S, Heiland D, Jones D et al (2003) Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 10(1):43–47

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Casaubon J, Niakan S, Vicks E, Perez Coulter A, Jacobbe DL, Mason H (2022) The effect of delay of excisional biopsy on upstage rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, and radial scar. Breast Cancer Res Treat 196(3):527–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06745-7

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Green S, Khalkhali I, Azizollahi E et al (2011) Excisional biopsy of borderline lesions after large bore vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy- is it necessary? Am Surg 77(10):1358–1360

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I et al (2007) Underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer 109(3):487–495

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G et al (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2497–2501

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

American College of Radiology. Practice guidelines for performance of ultrasound guided percutaneous breast interventional procedures (2009) Available at: http:// www.acr.orgw/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/US_Guided_Breast.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2013

Vimpeli SM, Saarenmaa I, Huhtala H, Soimakallio S (2008) Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value. Acta Radiol 49(8):863–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850802235751

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fernández-García P, Marco-Doménech SF, Lizán-Tudela L et al (2017) The cost effectiveness of vacuum-assisted versus core-needle versus surgical biopsy of breast lesions. Radiologia English, Spanish 59(1):40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2016.09.006

Polat AV, Soran A, Andacoglu O, Kamali Polat A, McGuire K, Diego E, Johnson R (2013) The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis. J BUON. 18(3):601–7

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soyder A, Taskın F, Ozbas S (2015) Imaging-histological discordance after sonographically guided breast core biopsy. Breast Care 10:33–37

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kirshenbaum K, Keppke A, Hou K, Dickerson M, Gajjar M, Kirshenbaum G (2012) Reassessing specimen number and diagnostic yield of ultrasound guided breast core biopsy. Breast J 18(5):464–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01269.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S (2005) Accuracy of sonographically guided 14- gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least 2-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33:47–52

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K et al (2005) Ultrasound guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 92:231–235

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sohn YM, Yoon JH, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kim MJ (2014) Percutaneous ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted removal versus surgery for breast lesions showing imaging-histology discordance after ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy. Korean J Radiol. 15(6):697–703. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.697

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ et al (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6:102–109

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comstock CE (2005) US-guided interventional procedures. In: Feig SA (ed) 2005 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology— breast imaging. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 155–168

Google Scholar 

Parikh J, Tickman R (2005) Image-guided tissue sampling: where radiology meets pathology. Breast J 11:403–409

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnson NB, Collins LC (2009) Update on percutaneous needle biopsy of nonmalignant breast lesions. Adv Anat Pathol 16(4):18

Article  Google Scholar 

Vimal M (2015) A study on accuracy of frozen section diagnosis and turnaround time. Int J Health Sci Res 5(12):138–142

Google Scholar 

Clough KB, Benyahi D, Nos C, Charles C, Sarfati I (2015) Oncoplastic surgery: pushing the limits of breast-conserving surgery. Breast J 21:140–146

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ojala K, Meretoja TJ, Leidenius MHK (2017) Aesthetic and functional outcome after breast conserving surgery – comparison between conventional and oncoplastic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.019

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wijgman D, ten Wolde B, van Groesen N, Keemers-Gels M, van den Wildenberg F, Strobbe L (2017) Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohamedahmed AYY, Zaman S, Zafar S, Laroiya I, Iqbal J, Tan MLH, Shetty G (2022) Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies. Surg Oncol 42:101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101779

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif