Ghulmiyyah L, Sinno S, Mirza F, et al. Episiotomy: history, present and future—a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:1386–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1755647.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Okeahialam NA, Wong KW, Jha S, et al. Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:1393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05145-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hersh SR, Emeis CL. Mediolateral episiotomy: technique, practice, and training. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65:404–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13096.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Latif D, Darweesh FF, Osman OM, et al. Oral tramadol versus oral celecoxib for analgesia after mediolateral episiotomy repair in obese primigravidae: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32:2465–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04411-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sagi-Dain L, Kreinin-Bleicher I, Bahous R, et al. Is it time to abandon episiotomy use? A randomized controlled trial (EPITRIAL). Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:2377–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04332-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017:CD000081. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Deyaso ZF, Chekole TT, Bedada RG, et al. Prevalence of episiotomy practice and factors associated with it in Ethiopia, systematic review and meta-analysis. Womens Health (Lond). 2022;18:17455057221091660. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057221091659.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pereira GMV, Hosoume RS, de Castro Monteiro MV, et al. Selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:2291–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04308-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Demšar K, Svetina M, Verdenik I, et al. Tokophobia (fear of childbirth): prevalence and risk factors. J Perinat Med. 2018;46:151–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0282.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jahani Shoorab N, Mirteimouri M, Taghipour A, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Women’s experiences of emotional recovery from childbirth-related perineal trauma: a qualitative content analysis. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2019;7:181–91. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.44993.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai CY, Cheung HW, Hsi Lao TT, et al. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalisable? A prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1116–21. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767050902994820.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karaçam Z, Eroğlu K. Effects of episiotomy on bonding and mothers’ health. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43:384–94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02727.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choudhari RG, Tayade SA, Venurkar SV, Deshpande VP. A review of episiotomy and modalities for relief of episiotomy pain. Cureus. 2022;14:e31620. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31620.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Laine K, Yli BM, Cole V, et al. European guidelines on perinatal care—peripartum care episiotomy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:8797–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.2005022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoffman HG, Richards TL, Van Oostrom T, et al. The analgesic effects of opioids and immersive virtual reality distraction: evidence from subjective and functional brain imaging assessments. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1776. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000270205.45146.db.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morris LD, Louw QA, Crous LC. Feasibility and potential effect of a low-cost virtual reality system on reducing pain and anxiety in adult burn injury patients during physiotherapy in a developing country. Burns. 2010;36:659–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.09.005.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schiza E, Matsangidou M, Neokleous K, Pattichis CS. Virtual reality applications for neurological disease: a review. Front Robot AI. 2019;6:100. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00100.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kouijzer MMTE, Kip H, Bouman YHA, Kelders SM. Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fouks Y, Kern G, Cohen A, et al. A virtual reality system for pain and anxiety management during outpatient hysteroscopy—a randomized control trial. Eur J Pain. 2022;26:600–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1882.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ebrahimian A, Rahmani Bilandi R. Comparisons of the effects of watching virtual reality videos and chewing gum on the length of delivery stages and maternal childbirth satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2021;46:15–22. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijms.2019.82782.1119.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kırca AŞ, Güdücü N, İkiz B. The effect of virtual glasses application on pain and anxiety during episiotomy repair: randomized controlled trial. Pain Manag Nurs. 2023;24:e123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2023.06.004.

Article  Google Scholar 

Peleg D, Yassin R, Shachar IB, Warsof S. 862 Virtual reality for pain reduction during episiotomy and perineal tear repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230:S457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.886.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 2015;14:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.

Article  Google Scholar 

Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, Olkin I. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat Med Stat Med. 2003;22:2113–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1461.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohamed HAO, Yehia Moustafa Sweelam M, Mohamed SH, et al. Effect of virtual reality application on pain and anxiety among primiparous women with episiotomy. Egypt J Health Care. 2022;13:625–39. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2022.233172.

Article  Google Scholar 

Aboushady RM-N, Fawzy Abbas Soliman H, El-Sayed El-Sayed Amr T, Ebrahim Abd Elnabi MM. Effect of new modality application during episiotomy repair on pain, anxiety, and satisfaction among primiparous women. Egypt J Health Care. 2023;14:389–406. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2023.295784.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jahani Shoorab N, Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Nahvi A, et al. The effect of virtual reality on pain in primiparity women during episiotomy repair: a randomize clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;40:219–24.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jahani Shourab N, Zagami SE, Golmakhani N, et al. Virtual reality and anxiety in primiparous women during episiotomy repair. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016;21:521–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.193417.

Article  Google Scholar 

Orhan M, Bülez A. The effect of virtual reality glasses applied during the episiotomy on pain and satisfaction: a single blind randomized controlled study. J Pain Res. 2023;16:2227–39.