CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERISTICS OF PLASMA CELL RICH REJECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT BIOPSIES

Abstract

Background Plasma cell rich rejection (PCRR) is an uncommon, ill-defined type of renal allograft rejection in the current literature considered a subtype of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). PCRR has poorer clinical outcome and is often refractory to classic immunosuppressive therapy. Our study analyzed clinical course, Banff lesion scores and mRNA expression of PCRR compared to (late) rejection. Methods We retrospectively scored and reclassified the last known biopsy of 263 renal transplant recipients, morphologically classified as rejection according to the 2019 Banff classification. mRNA expression analysis was performed using the Nanostring B-HOT panel on a subset of cases. PCRR was compared to (late) TCMR, ABMR and mixed rejection for renal function follow-up and graft survival. Results mRNA analysis revealed uniquely expressed genes in PCRR including LOX, CPA3, IL4, IL17F, and MMP12. PCRR is enriched for genes related to mast cells, memory B- and T-cells and transcripts involved in NK cells and allograft fibrosis with heterogeneity in gene expression in biopsies with PCRR. PCRR might be a late event compared to late TCMR and ABMR, with a higher degree of total inflammation and fibrosis. Graft survival and renal function was similar to late TCMR and ABMR during a 5-year follow-up period after renal biopsy. Conclusion PCRR represents a distinct late-onset stage of inflammation displaying diverse gene expression patterns, with presence of mainly mast cells, NK cells and transcripts involved in renal allograft fibrosis. Clinical outcomes in patients with PCRR appeared more similar to late TCMR and ABMR.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Dutch Kidney Foundation grant no. DKF15OP09

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The ethics committee/IRB of Amsterdam UMC gave ethical approval for this work (Amsterdam 19.260). The need for informed consent was waived by the ethics and privacy committees.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif