Ex vivo human leukemia blood model illustrates limitations of cancer-targeting PEGylated nanoparticles

Abstract

Antibody-directed targeting of chemotherapeutic nanomaterials to primary human cancers could improve efficacy and reduce off-target toxicities. We developed an ex vivo model to study the targeting of primary human Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in whole blood samples from 15 subjects with CLL. Anti-CD20 targeted polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based nanoparticles had generally efficient targeting of CLL cells and low off-target phagocytosis by neutrophils and monocytes. There was however substantial patient-patient variability (up to 164-fold difference in CLL targeting), driven in part by variance in pre-existing anti-PEG antibodies which reduced targeting effects. This suggests patients with lower PEG antibody levels may benefit more from targeted therapies. This was further exemplified by antibody-functionalized doxorubicin-containing PEGylated liposomes, which had relatively poor targeting of CLL in blood and high off-target uptake (significantly correlated with anti-PEG IgG levels in blood) and killing of almost all monocytes within 24 hours. Personalized low-fouling and non-PEGylated particle systems are needed to realize the potential of targeting chemotherapies. Overall, our human ex vivo model of tumor targeting by antibody-directed nanoparticles delineates limitations and opportunities of tumor-targeting nanomedicines.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project (DP210103114 to FC, SJK, YJ), an ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DE230101542 to YJ), a Maxwell Eagle Endowment Award for Cancer Research (to YJ and SJK), an RMIT Vice-Chancellors Postdoctoral Fellowship (to YJ), an NHMRC program grant (GNT1149990 to SJK), and NHMRC Investigator grants (SJK, GNT2016732 to FC, KT).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study protocols were approved by the University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (# 2057981.1, 13/36, 22993-34586-3) and all associated procedures were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif