Rus, D. & Tolley, M. T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521, 467–475 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sethi, S. S., Kovac, M., Wiesemüller, F., Miriyev, A. & Boutry, C. M. Biodegradable sensors are ready to transform autonomous ecological monitoring. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1245–1247 (2022).
Hartmann, F., Baumgartner, M. & Kaltenbrunner, M. Becoming sustainable, the new frontier in soft robotics. Adv. Mater. 33, 2004413 (2021).
Lamanna, L., Cataldi, P., Friuli, M., Demitri, C. & Caironi, M. Monitoring of drug release via intra body communication with an edible pill. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8, 2200731 (2023).
Marik, P. E. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 665–671 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Amirkolaie, A. K. Reduction in the environmental impact of waste discharged by fish farms through feed and feeding: aquaculture and the environment. Rev. Aquac. 3, 19–26 (2011).
Just Economics. Dead loss: the high cost of poor farming practices and mortalities on salmon farms. Changing Markets Foundation https://www.justeconomics.co.uk/uploads/reports/Aquaculture-Report-v5.pdf (2021).
Pohlmann, K., Grasso, F. W. & Breithaupt, T. Tracking wakes: the nocturnal predatory strategy of piscivorous catfish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7371–7374 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Meng, X. J., Lindsay, D. S. & Sriranganathan, N. Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 2697–2707 (2009).
Fraser, D. Toward a synthesis of conservation and animal welfare science. Anim. Welf. 19, 121–124 (2010).
Fraser, D. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Vet. Scand. 50, S1 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ashby, M. F. Materials selection in mechanical design. MRS Bull. 30, 994–997 (1999).
Radhakrishnan, V. Locomotion: dealing with friction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5448–5455 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Godshall, M. A., Eggleston, G., Thompson, J. & Kochergin, V. in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology 1–84 (Wiley, 2021).
Ramos, K. J. & Bahr, D. F. Mechanical behavior assessment of sucrose using nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 22, 2037–2045 (2007).
Eichhorn, S. J. & Young, R. J. The Young’s modulus of a microcrystalline cellulose. Cellulose 8, 197–207 (2001).
Sun, C. True density of microcrystalline cellulose. J. Pharm. Sci. 94, 2132–2134 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Keetels, C. J. A. M., van Vliet, T. & Walstra, P. Relationship between the sponge structure of starch bread and its mechanical properties. J. Cereal Sci. 24, 27–31 (1996).
Liu, Z. & Scanlon, M. G. Understanding and modeling the processing-mechanical property relationship of bread crumb assessed by indentation. Cereal Chem. 79, 763–767 (2002).
Shintake, J., Sonar, H., Piskarev, E., Paik, J. & Floreano, D. Soft pneumatic gelatin actuator for edible robotics. in 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 6221–6226 (IEEE, 2017).
Kwak, B., Shintake, J., Zhang, L. & Floreano, D. Towards edible drones for rescue missions: design and flight of nutritional wings. in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 1802–1809 (IEEE, 2022).
Qi, Q., Keller, A., Tan, L., Kumaresan, Y. & Rossiter, J. Edible, optically modulating, shape memory oleogel composites for sustainable soft robotics. Mater. Des. 235, 112339 (2023).
Bourlieu, C., Guillard, V., Vallès-Pàmies, B. & Gontard, N. in Food Materials Science: Principles and Practice Ch. 23 (Springer, 2008).
Yuan, Y. et al. Shellac: a promising natural polymer in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 109, 139–153 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Functional food packaging for reducing residual liquid food: thermo-resistant edible super-hydrophobic coating from coffee and beeswax. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 533, 742–749 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, D., Huang, J., Guo, Z. & Liu, W. Durable mixed edible wax coating with stretching superhydrophobicity. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 1495–1499 (2021).
Wösten, H. A. B. & Scholtmeijer, K. Applications of hydrophobins: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 1587–1597 (2015).
Maulana, M. I. et al. Environmentally friendly starch-based adhesives for bonding high-performance wood composites: a review. Forests 13, 1614 (2022).
Mukherjee, T., Lerma‐Reyes, R., Thompson, K. A. & Schrick, K. Making glue from seeds and gums: working with plant‐based polymers to introduce students to plant biochemistry. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 47, 468–475 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Doll, K. M. & Erhan, S. Z. Evaluation of a sugar-based edible adhesive using a tensile strength tester. J. Lab. Autom. 16, 153–156 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Román, J. K. & Wilker, J. J. Cooking chemistry transforms proteins into high-strength adhesives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 1359–1365 (2019).
Schmidt, G. et al. Strong adhesives from corn protein and tannic acid. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 3, 1900077 (2019).
Moubarik, A., Charrier, B., Allal, A., Charrier, F. & Pizzi, A. Development and optimization of a new formaldehyde-free cornstarch and tannin wood adhesive. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 68, 167–177 (2010).
North, M. A., Del Grosso, C. A. & Wilker, J. J. High strength underwater bonding with polymer mimics of mussel adhesive proteins. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 7866–7872 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cataldi, P. et al. An electrically conductive oleogel paste for edible electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2113417 (2022).
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B. & Cianchetti, M. Soft robotics: technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci. Robot. 1, eaah3690 (2016).
Wei, M., Gao, Y., Li, X. & Serpe, M. J. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications. Polym. Chem. 8, 127–143 (2016).
Mirvakili, S. M. & Hunter, I. W. Artificial muscles: mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704407 (2018).
Aubin, C. A. et al. Powerful, soft combustion actuators for insect-scale robots. Science 381, 1212–1217 (2023).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. et al. Resilient yet entirely degradable gelatin-based biogels for soft robots and electronics. Nat. Mater. 19, 1102–1109 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sardesai, A. N. et al. Design and characterization of edible soft robotic candy actuators. MRS Adv. 3, 3003–3009 (2018).
Hughes, J. & Rus, D. Mechanically programmable, degradable & ingestible soft actuators. in 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 836–843 (IEEE, 2020).
Ahn, S., Kasi, R. M., Kim, S.-C., Sharma, N. & Zhou, Y. Stimuli-responsive polymer gels. Soft Matter 4, 1151–1157 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, Z. et al. Stimulus-responsive hydrogels in food science: a review. Food Hydrocolloids 124, 107218 (2022).
Djabourov, M., Nishinari, K. & Ross-Murphy, S. B. Physical Gels from Biological and Synthetic Polymers (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Keller, A. G., Qi, Q., Kumaresan, Y., Conn, A. T. & Rossiter, J. Biodegradable humidity actuators for sustainable soft robotics using deliquescent hydrogels. in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 1–6 (IEEE, 2023).
Sarıyer, S., Duranoğlu, D., Doğan, Ö. & Küçük, İ. pH-responsive double network alginate/kappa-carrageenan hydrogel beads for controlled protein release: effect of pH and crosslinking agent. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 56, 101551 (2020).
Shigemitsu, H. et al. An adaptive supramolecular hydrogel comprising self-sorting double nanofibre networks. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 165–172 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ali, A. & Ahmed, S. Recent advances in edible polymer based hydrogels as a sustainable alternative to conventional polymers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 6940–6967 (2018).
留言 (0)