Unraveling robust brain-behavior links of depressive complaints through granular network models for understanding heterogeneity

ElsevierVolume 359, 15 August 2024, Pages 140-144Journal of Affective DisordersAuthor links open overlay panel, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , …Highlights•

We evaluated the utility of brain-symptom network models of depressive symptoms.

No brain-symptom associations in a network with depressive symptom severity score.

Individual depressive symptoms showed various connections with neural substrates.

Lower cortical thickness (insula, mOFC, cingulate) associated with symptoms.

AbstractBackground

Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent, present in heterogeneous symptom patterns, and share diverse neurobiological underpinnings. Understanding the links between psychopathological symptoms and biological factors is critical in elucidating its etiology and persistence. We aimed to evaluate the utility of using symptom-brain network models to parse the heterogeneity of depressive complaints in a large adolescent sample.

Methods

We used data from the third wave of the IMAGEN study, a multi-center panel cohort study involving 1317 adolescents (52.49 % female, mean ± SD age = 18.5 ± 0.7). Two network models were estimated: one including an overall depressive symptom severity sum score based on the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS), and one incorporating individual ADRS item scores. Both networks included measures of cortical thickness in several regions (insula, cingulate, mOFC, fusiform gyrus) and hippocampal volume derived from neuroimaging.

Results

The network based on individual item scores revealed associations between cortical thickness measures and specific depressive complaints, obscured when using an aggregate depression severity score. Notably, the insula's cortical thickness showed negative associations with cognitive dysfunction (partial cor. = −0.15); the cingulate's cortical thickness showed negative associations with feelings of worthlessness (partial cor. = −0.10), and mOFC was negatively associated with anhedonia (partial cor. = −0.05).

Limitations

This cross-sectional study relied on the self-reported assessment of depression complaints and used a non-clinical sample with predominantly healthy participants (19 % with depression or sub-threshold depression).

Conclusions

This study showcases the utility of network models in parsing heterogeneity in depressive complaints, linking individual complaints to specific neural substrates. We outline the next steps to integrate neurobiological and cognitive markers to unravel MDD's phenotypic heterogeneity.

Keywords

Depression symptoms

Neural markers

Network analysis

Heterogeneity

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif