Managing Low Back Pain in Rural Uganda: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives and Practices of Frontline Health Workers regarding LBP Management in Primary Care.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Low-back pain (LBP) is the main cause of years lived with disabilities (YLDs) worldwide and the second cause of YLDs in Uganda. In 2019, it was responsible for 7.4% of global YLDs and 5% of YLDs in Uganda. LBP takes a significant toll on people’s quality of life and disproportionately affects lower socioeconomic classes, elders, and women. In rural Uganda, LBP is managed in health centres by clinical officers and nurses with limited resources. This study aims to understand the perspectives and practices of these health workers. Method: A qualitative design using semi-structured focus-group discussions was employed. Purposive sampling allowed us to identify relevant participants based on their roles as healthcare professionals working in primary care context in rural South-West Uganda. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: LBP is a common and persistent complaint among patients presenting to rural health centres in Uganda. Manual labour and female specific health conditions were deemed to be common causes. There was a strong reliance on medication prescription, coupled with X-ray diagnosis, with little emphasis on education or exercise. Finally, findings highlighted major barriers for patients within the referral system to hospital care or rehabilitation. Discussion: Education and training of frontline clinicians in terms of appropriate prescribing and rehabilitation for LBP is crucial. Evidence-based rehabilitation interventions need to be developed and adapted so that they can be delivered within the time and resource constraints of the health workforce, ensuring that they are acceptable and effective to patients in the context of rural Uganda.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Yes

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study received ethical approval from the Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research Ethics Committee (MUST-2022-540) and from the Human Research Ethics Committee at University College Dublin (LS-LR-22-227-OSullivan).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are not publicly available because participants did not give explicit consent for the data to be held in a public repository

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif