Shapiro BS, Rasouli MA, Verma K, Raman A, Garner FC, Aguirre M, et al. The effect of ovarian follicle size on oocyte and embryology outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(6):1170–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wyns C, De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Motrenko T, Smeenk J, et al. ART in Europe, 2018: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum Reprod Open. 2022(3):hoac022.

Wang JG, Douglas NC, Dicken C, Nakhuda GS, Guarnaccia MM, Sauer MV. Cryopreservation of supernumerary high quality embryos predicts favorable outcomes for patients undergoing repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):368–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. Dramatic declines in implantation and pregnancy rates in patients who undergo repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization with blastocyst transfer after one or more failed attempts. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):538–42.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eppsteiner EE, Sparks AET, Liu D, Van Voorhis BJ. Change in oocyte yield in repeated in vitro fertilization cycles: Effect of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):399–402.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wald K, Hariton E, Morris JR, Chi EA, Jaswa EG, Cedars MI, et al. Changing stimulation protocol on repeat conventional ovarian stimulation cycles does not lead to improved laboratory outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(3):757–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silberstein T, Trimarchi JR, Gonzalez L, Keefe DL, Blazar AS. Pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization decreases to a plateau with repeated cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(4):1043–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cai H, Mol BW, Li P, Liu X, Watrelot A, Shi J. Tubal factor infertility with prior ectopic pregnancy: a double whammy? A retrospective cohort study of 2,892 women. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(5):1032–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li W, Xue X, Zhao W, Ren A, Zhuo W, Shi J. Blastocyst transfer is not associated with increased unfavorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(11):857–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cai H, Mol B, Gordts S, Wang H, Shi J. Elective single versus double blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in women aged 36 years or older: a retrospective cohort study. Hum Fertil. 2023;31:1–10.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Fanton M, Cho JH, Baker VL, Loewke K. A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(5):762–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doldi N, Persico P, De Santis L, Rabellotti E, Papaleo E, Ferrari A. Consecutive cycles in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005;20(3):132–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ezoe K, Miki T, Akaike H, Shimazaki K, Takahashi T, Tanimura Y, Amagai A, Sawado A, Mogi M, Kaneko S, Ueno S, Coticchio G, Cimadomo D, Borini A, Rienzi L, Kato K. Maternal age affects pronuclear and chromatin dynamics, morula compaction and cell polarity, and blastulation of human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(3):387–99.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Boer EJ, Den Tonkelaar I, Burger CW, Looman CWN, van Leeuwen FE, Velde ER, et al. The number of retrieved oocytes does not decrease during consecutive gonadotrophin-stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(4):899–904.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Griffiths A, Dyer SM, Lord SJ, Pardy C, Fraser IS, Eckermann S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization by maternal age and number of treatment attempts. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(4):924–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McLernon DJ, Steyerberg EW, Te Velde ER, Lee AJ, Bhattacharya S. Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: Population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women. BMJ. 2016;355: i5735.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Troude P, Guibert J, Bouyer J, De La Rochebrochard E. Medical factors associated with early IVF discontinuation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(3):321–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar