Available online 9 May 2024, 101142
Author links open overlay panel, , , AbstractAbusive head trauma (AHT) is associated with high mortality and poorer outcomes compared to accidental head injuries. The short and long-term developmental outcomes for AHT are not well identified. Variability in outcome measures, small sample sizes, difficulty in measuring domain-specific developmental skills, co-existence of comorbidities, genetic and environmental factors and high attrition rates all contribute to the challenges on providing data in this area. The objective of this article is to review the scientific literature on the developmental outcomes of AHT, highlighting factors that affect outcomes, the available assessment tools, and short and long-term developmental outcomes, recommended follow up, societal costs, and future opportunities for research. Authors searched OVID Medline and PubMed for articles published between 2013-2023 using the terms “abuse”, “craniocerebral trauma” and “development”. Fifty-five records were included for this review. The data shows that injuries sustained from AHT result in a spectrum of outcomes ranging from normal development to death. There are more than 100 outcome assessment tools limiting the ability to compare studies. More than half of patients are left with disabilities post discharge. Gross motor and cognition/academics are the 2 most common domains studied. Advancement in surgical and neurocritical care management has influenced AHT outcomes. Close long-term follow up is recommended to maximize each child's developmental potential, irrespective of the presence of disability at discharge. We suggest that future research should focus on adopting a consistent diagnostic and assessment approach and explore the social environmental factors that can affect recovery.
Section snippetsTerminologyMultiple terms have been used to describe what is now referred to as Abusive Head Trauma (AHT). These include Shaken Baby Syndrome, whiplash-shaking injury, or Shaken Impact Syndrome. In 2009, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement favoring the term AHT as more inclusive of the variety of traumatic mechanisms that lead to injury, including both impact and shaking events [1]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines AHT as any head injury to a child <
DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMESInjuries from AHT result in a spectrum of outcomes ranging from normal development to death. The CDC estimates 25% to 30% of those with AHT die acutely, while 15% survive without any sequelae, leaving most patients with a disability [32]. A cohort study of 940 children showed that 72% of children who were exposed to AHT developed a long-term disability by age 5 [33].
Studies addressing developmental outcomes following AHT have variable inclusion criteria, age range, outcome measures, and follow
CRediT authorship contribution statementDina Ahmad: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization. Amanda Small: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Resources, Methodology, Conceptualization. Ashley Gibson: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. Natalie Kissoon: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization.
Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
FundingThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
AcknowledgmentsWe thank Dr. Sarah Risen, assistant professor in Pediatric Neurology at Baylor College of Medicine, for her expert review of the manuscript. We also thank Sonya Fogg, librarian at the Texas Medical Center library, for providing advice about literature search methodology.
References (47)E.A. Eismann et al.Early developmental, behavioral, and quality of life outcomes following abusive head trauma in infantsChild Abuse & Neglect
(Oct. 2020)
A.R. JensenFunctional status impairment at six-month follow-up is independently associated with child physical abuse mechanismChild Abuse & Neglect
(Dec. 2021)
S.-C. Ang et al.Outcome of abusive head trauma in children less than 2 years: A single center study from a middle-income countryChild Abuse & Neglect
(Oct. 2021)
J. Friedman et al.Primary prevention of pediatric abusive head trauma: A cost audit and cost-utility analysisChild Abuse & Neglect
(Nov. 2012)
J. AntoniettiThe medical and social outcome in 2016 of infants who were victims of shaken baby syndrome between 2005 and 2013Archives de Pédiatrie
(Jan. 2019)
R.A. Falcone et al.Despite overall low pediatric head injury mortality, disparities exist between racesJournal of Pediatric Surgery
(Oct. 2008)
C.A. Martin et al.Severity of head computed tomography scan findings fail to explain racial differences in mortality following child abuseThe American Journal of Surgery
(Feb. 2010)
C.W. Christian et al.Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, “Abusive head trauma in infants and childrenPediatrics
(2009)
S. Parks, J. Annest, H. Hill, and D. Karch, “Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma: Recommended Definitions for Public Health...H.T. Keenan et al.Longitudinal Developmental Outcomes of Infants and Toddlers With Traumatic Brain InjuryJAMA Netw Open
(Jan. 2023)
M.E. Shanahan et al.National, Regional, and State Abusive Head Trauma: Application of the CDC AlgorithmPediatrics
(Dec. 2013)
K.J. Deans et al.Increased morbidity and mortality of traumatic brain injury in victims of nonaccidental traumaJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
(Jul. 2013)
E.-P. Lee et al.Predictors of neurologic outcomes and mortality in physically abused and unintentionally injured children: a retrospective observation studyEur J Med Res
(Oct. 2023)
View full text© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
留言 (0)