The Impact on Birth Outcomes of Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation in Neonatal Macrosomia

  SFX Search  Buy Article Permissions and Reprints Abstract

Objective Our objective was to examine the association between sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women with neonatal macrosomia.

Study Design This study, conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital from 2017 to 2021, compared obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between two groups of women who delivered macrosomic newborns (actual birthweight ≥ 4,000 g): (1) those with EFW ≥ 3,800 g (suspected impending macrosomia) and (2) those with EFW < 3,800 g (unsuspected impending macrosomia).

Results During the study period, 854 women with neonatal macrosomia attempted vaginal delivery. Only 9.2% had a sonographic EFW ≥ 4,000 g. Among women with EFW ≥ 3,800 g (n = 317) compared with EFW < 3,800 g (n = 537), the cesarean delivery (CD) rate was higher (17.0 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.004) and the operative delivery rate was lower (3.2 vs. 0.6%, p = 0.015). Among primiparous women, the CD rate was higher among those with EFW ≥ 3,800 versus <3,800 g (37.3 vs. 23.2%, p = 0.033). EFW ≥3,800 g was associated with CD, regardless of predelivery body mass index, parity, diabetes mellitus, maximal fetal weight at previous deliveries, actual birthweight, and labor induction (p = 0.014). EFW ≥ 3,800 g and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of CD. Among women with EFW ≥3,800 g and diabetes mellitus, the risk of CD was double that of those without diabetes and with EFW ≥ 3,800 g (31.4% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.02), although their actual birthweights were similar. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were similar between those with sonographic EFW ≥ 3,800 and < 3,800 g.

Conclusion Larger EFW increased CD risk among pregnancies with actual neonatal macrosomia. Antenatally suspected macrosomia might alter labor management due to concerns for potential complications, especially when associated with primiparity, diabetes mellitus, or maternal obesity. The increase in the CD rate did not show an association with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Key Points

Antenatally suspected macrosomia might alter labor management due to concerns about complications.

Larger EFW increased cesarean delivery risk among pregnancies with actual neonatal macrosomia.

The increase in the cesarean delivery rate was not associated with improved outcomes.

Keywords sonographic estimated fetal weight - macrosomic newborns - cesarean delivery - primiparity - diabetes mellitus - maternal obesity Authors' Contributions

The project development was led by I.S. and M.F.W., while K.N. contributed to the project development. I.M. was responsible for data collection, while R.A.S. conducted the data analysis. Additionally, A.B. also contributed to data collection. L.L. provided critical review of the manuscript.


Ethical Approval

Research involving human participants and/or animals—our study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol of the study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (Helsinki Committee) of the Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel (date of approval 6 July 2020, number of approval 0113-20-NHR). Informed consent—the need for written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Publication History

Received: 26 November 2023

Accepted: 05 April 2024

Article published online:
02 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif