Factors influencing survival and mortality among adult Aboriginal Australians with bronchiectasis—A 10-year retrospective study

1 Introduction

Bronchiectasis is a chronic pulmonary condition that is clinically characterised by a vicious cycle of recurrent lower respiratory tract infections and airway inflammation (1, 2). Globally, there is emerging evidence to suggest that presence of bronchiectasis is associated with overall higher mortality rates (39). In the Australian context, approximately 3.3% of the population self-identify as of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander descent (from here on “Indigenous” is used to refer to global First nations populations, while “Aboriginal Australian/ population/patients/people” is used to specifically refer to Australians First Nations population) and the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia has the highest proportion of Australian Aboriginal people in comparison to all other Australian states and territories (10). Chronic respiratory disorders are reported to be highly prevalent among the adult Aboriginal Australian population (11, 12), and more so among those residing in the NT of Australia. In particular, prevalence of bronchiectasis is noted to be substantially higher among Aboriginal Australians compared to non-Aboriginal Australians (13, 14). Furthermore, hospital admission rates and overall mortality secondary to chronic respiratory disorders, including for bronchiectasis, are significantly higher among adult Aboriginal Australians in comparison to their non-Aboriginal counterparts (1520).

In other diverse non-Indigenous ethnic populations, studies have demonstrated several factors which influence survival and mortality amongst patients with bronchiectasis such as, but not limited to lung function parameters, sputum microbiology, body mass index (BMI) and therapeutic interventions such as respiratory airway clearance (2123). However, despite the high prevalence of bronchiectasis among Aboriginal Australians, there is scant evidence in the literature determining if these same factors are associated with survival or mortality in this population. The high prevalence of comorbidities, reduced lung function parameters (1120, 24, 25), and unique environmental context of Aboriginal Australians which may predispose them to colonisation by other micro-organisms may indicate that other factors should be considered when predicting mortality risk. Hence, it is reasonable to explore those potential clinical parameters that may be influential for survival or mortality among adult Aboriginal Australians with bronchiectasis. This may lead on to identifying relevant clinical data for future interventions which would aid in reducing on-going adverse health consequences amongst adult Aboriginal patients suffering from bronchiectasis. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate and identify relevant clinical parameters that may indicate or influence survival and mortality in an adult Aboriginal Australian cohort diagnosed to have bronchiectasis over a 10-year study period (2011–2020) in the Top End Health Service (TEHS) region of the NT of Australia.

2 Materials and methods 2.1 Setting and study participants

This study was conducted at the respiratory and sleep division based at the Royal Darwin Hospital, a university affiliated tertiary care teaching hospital and Darwin Respiratory and Sleep Health, Darwin Private Hospital, within the TEHS, NT region of Australia. This study is a part of a larger project examining various aspects of bronchiectasis disease profiles among the adult Aboriginal population residing in the TEHS health district of the NT of Australia, which is inclusive of all adult Australian Aboriginal patients aged ≥18 years identified to have bronchiectasis via chest Computed tomography (CT) scan between 2011 and 2020.

2.2 Ethics

This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics governance/committee of the TEHS, NT and Menzies School of Health Research (Reference: HREC; 2019-3547). The authors acknowledge the rights of Australian Aboriginal people involved in this study, and as such conducted and reported according to strengthening and reporting of health research involving Aboriginal people (26), including consultations with institute Aboriginal representatives.

2.3 Clinical data assessed

Baseline demographics, age, sex, including smoking status and BMI when available were recorded. Patients usual place of residence as per community/suburb/postcode were collected, with further categorisation into the four health districts of the Top End (Darwin Urban, Darwin Rural, East Arnhem and Katherine), and by community when communities had >10 bronchiectasis cases were present (27). Presence of respiratory conditions alongside bronchiectasis and other medical comorbidities, including inhaled pharmacotherapy use [short-acting/long-acting beta antagonist (SABA/LABA), short-acting/long-acting muscarinic agents (SAMA/LAMA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)] were recorded. Details of chest CT scan findings, lung function test results [spirometry, forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)] and sputum microbiology results were also collected. Only respiratory related hospital admissions were extracted for assessment. All clinical parameters for this study were assessed via individual patients’ electronic medical records. Mortality data was extracted through the hospital information system, death registry linkage was not utilised, and all-cause mortality was documented up until 31st December 2020. Further details on methods and study design are available form a recent report from our centre (27). The primary outcome in this study was all-cause mortality.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Data were presented as median [interquartile range (IQR)] for continuous parameters, or number (%) for categorical parameters. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, radiological extent, hospitalisations and sputum cultures between surviving and deceased patients were tested via univariate logistic regression (categorical parameters) or quantile regression (continuous parameters). Stepwise Cox and quantile multivariate regressions were performed to identify factors associated with mortality and with age of death, respectively. The models included demographics (age, sex and residence location using Darwin area as reference), presence of comorbidities (restricted to those experienced by >10 patients in this cohort), radiological extent (bilateral involvement and ≥3 lobes effected), hospitalisation history (any hospitalisations, total time in hospital, any intensive care unit (ICU) visits), sputum results (presence of haemophilus, streptococcus, moraxella, staphylococcus, aspergillus, non-Aspergillus fungi, klebsiella, mycobacterium or burkholderia), and pharmacotherapy. A second multivariate Cox regression model was created (see Supplementary material 2) for mortality including BMI, current smoking and lung function, as only one-third of patients in our cohort had these data available. In the stepwise models, parameters with a p-value < 0.1 were considered for further analyses. Multicollinearity of included parameters was checked via Pearsons R2, and pairs with an R2 > 0.5 sequentially excluded until the models with the best fit were found. Results were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) or beta (95% CI). All p-values were adjusted for multiple hypotheses testing via Romano-Wolf adjustment, utilising 750 bootstrap replications. Analyses were conducted in STATA IC 15 (College Station, Texas).

3 Results 3.1 Demographic and clinical details

In total 459 patients were retrospectively enrolled, of which 146 (31.8%) were recorded deceased by 31st of December 2020 (Figure 1). The median follow-up time for the surviving group was 10 years (IQR 10, 10), and for the deceased group was 7.1 years (IQR 4.6, 8.5). Patients who survived during this study period were younger upon enrolment [median 45 years (IQR 38.2, 53.5) vs. 52.2 years (IQR 43.4, 59.5), p = 0.023], had higher FEV1 [40% (IQR 31, 35) vs. 29% predicted (IQR 24, 40)] and a lower prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (79 vs. 91%), lung cancer (3 vs. 7%), hypertension (58 vs. 73%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (36 vs. 50%) and heart failure (7 vs. 12%) than patients who were recorded deceased (Table 1). However, following Romano-Wolf adjustment, aside from age, there were no statistically significant differences in relation to clinical, comorbidities nor inhaled pharmacotherapy prescriptions between the two groups. There were also no significant differences noted in mortality between health districts, nor at the community level (Supplementary material 1).

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival graph across the study period (Jan 2011-December 2020).

www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of surviving and deceased patients.

3.2 Chest CT findings and mortality

Chest CT scans demonstrated that the left lower lobe was the most commonly affected in both surviving (74%) and deceased (73%) cohorts, followed by the right lower lobe (59 and 69%, respectively) (Table 2). The left upper lobe appeared less commonly affected in the surviving cohort (19%) compared to the deceased cohort (27%), as was bilateral involvement (72 and 78%, respectively), however, the differences did not reach statistical significance.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Radiological extent of bronchiectasis between surviving and deceased patients.

3.3 Sputum cultures and mortality data

Sputum cultures were available for 425 patients [283 surviving (90.4%), 142 deceased (97.3%)]. Haemophilus was the most commonly cultured sputum overall, followed by non-Aspergillus fungi. Among those surviving, haemophilus (65 vs. 58%, p = 0.593) was the most commonly cultured organism, while among those deceased a greater proportion recorded non-Aspergillus fungi (65 vs. 46%, p = 0.007). Pseudomonas was also cultured less often in the surviving cohort compared to the deceased (28 vs. 46%, p = 0.007) (Table 3).

www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Sputum cultures for surviving and deceased patients.

3.4 Hospitalisations and mortality data

The majority of patients recorded at least one respiratory condition related hospitalisation during the study period, though a lesser proportion of those surviving did so (83%) compared to those deceased (95%) (Table 4). Patients who survived spent significantly less total time in hospital during the study window, with a median 12 days (IQR 3, 34) compared to those deceased with a median 34 days (IQR 12, 69) (p = 0.027). Half as many surviving patients recorded time in the ICU (22 vs. 42%, p = 0.066) or time on mechanical ventilation (6 vs. 12%, p = 0.431).

www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Hospitalisation information of surviving and deceased patients.

3.5 Regression analysis

In the Cox regression model (425 patients included), older age, presence of Pseudomonas and recorded ICU visits were associated with increased odds of mortality while cultured Haemophilus was associated with reduced odds of mortality (Table 5). In multivariate analysis use of LABA and LAMA were associated with reduced HR for morality, but this was attenuated with multiple hypothesis adjustment. In quantile regression (142 patients included), older age at the start of the study period and LABA prescription were associated with significantly older age at death, though the statistical significance associated with LABA prescription was attenuated following Romano-Wolf adjustment. Cox regression models for patients with lung function data, BMI and smoking data are displayed in Supplementary material 2. In the univariate cox regression model increasing FEV1 [HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.94, 0.99), p = 0.024] and BMI were associated with reduced odds of mortality [HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.87, 0.98), p = 0.051], however, in the multivariate model (n = 142) only BMI showed a statistically significant association with mortality [HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.82, 0.954), p = 0.017].

www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models for mortality reporting HRs (95% CI) and quantile regression models for age of death reporting betas (95% CI) for parameters included from stepwise regression.

4 Discussion

To the best of the authors knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate potential clinical parameters that may influence survival or future mortality amongst an adult Aboriginal Australian population, particularly among those residing in the Top End, NT of Australia. This study has illustrated that increasing age, prior need for ICU admissions, and prior positive sputum microbiology demonstrating Pseudomonas may increase the risk of mortality. On the other hand, a higher BMI, better lung function on spirometry and prior positive sputum microbiology demonstrating Haemophilus may be associated with a favourable outcome.

Across various ethnically diverse non-Indigenous populations, hospitalisation and mortality data have been well documented in the literature (39, 2123, 2831). Although the available reports suggest that the burden of chronic respiratory disorders is much higher among global First Nations Indigenous people (including higher heath care utilisation and hospital admission rates), there is scant evidence pertaining to factors that may predict mortality or survival among First Nations Indigenous people (20, 3238).

In comparison to international bronchiectasis cohorts, the current study cohort showed some unique clinical features. Most notably, the median age of death was 59.2 years, whereas in international data most deaths are among those aged >70 years (3). However, similar to as has been reported previously (3, 22, 39), we also noted a lower BMI in the deceased group at a median 22 kg/m2. The reason for a lower BMI being associated with mortality is unclear. It is reasonable to speculate that the resting energy expenditure and higher basal metabolic rate due to chronic respiratory tract infection, alongside chronic airway inflammation may be contributing to a lower BMI among patients with bronchiectasis as observed among patients with COPD (40, 41).

Among patients with bronchiectasis, multimorbidity, and especially respiratory comorbidities have been associated with significantly greater morbidity and mortality (46). Coexisting COPD in particular is shown to have a much worse prognosis (42). Among our cohort there was a significant prevalence of COPD, particularly among the deceased cohort at 91%, however, 79% of surviving patients were also noted to have COPD. This significant presence of disease amongst both surviving and deceased cohorts limits its ability to be used as a prognostic marker as it is in other populations.

In relation to laboratory parameters, lower lung function values, presence of pseudomonas on sputum microbiology and CT evidence of multi-lobar involvement are shown to be associated with poorer long-term prognosis among patients with bronchiectasis (39, 21). Among the deceased cohort in our study, lung function values were reduced (medians for FVC 45 vs. 53%, FEV1 29 vs. 40%, FEV1/FVC ratio 57 vs. 66 deceased vs. surviving, respectively) though this did not reach statistical significance. Although, this may not be statistically significant, it may have clinical relevance. Similar to what is observed in previous reports (6, 43), Pseudomonas was cultured more commonly among deceased patients than those surviving (45.8 vs. 27.6%). However, in our study in addition to pseudomonas, presence of non-Aspergillus fungi on sputum microbiology was significantly more common among deceased patients (64.8 vs. 46.3%). Further prospective studies may be useful to explore microbiology data in this population. The effects of therapeutic interventions, such as inhaled antibiotics (44) on survival and mortality has not been widely explored in the adult Aboriginal Australian patients with bronchiectasis. Further studies may be useful to investigate the beneficial effects of therapeutic modalities such as inhaled antibiotics, including N- Acetylcysteine in Indigenous patients (45). Use of ICS among patients with bronchiectasis is controversial (46, 47). Nonetheless, in our study more than half of the patients recorded an ICS prescription. ICS did not show any positive or negative association with mortality in our study. LABA and LAMA prescription however, was associated with reduced odds of mortality, and LABA prescription with an older age at death in multivariate regressions, though statistical significance of both was attenuated on multiple hypotheses adjustment. Nevertheless, in view of previous studies demonstrating positive impact on the use of LAMA among patients with bronchiectasis (48, 49), it is reasonable to assume that use of LAMA may have some favourable impact on survival in our study patients.

Among Aboriginal Australian patients, hospital admission rates secondary to respiratory conditions are reported to be higher than among non-Aboriginal Australian patients (50). In our study we noted that among the deceased cohort there was a significantly longer median time spent in hospital (34 compared to 12 days). Furthermore, a greater proportion among the deceased cohort required ICU care at some point (42 vs. 22%). ICU visits were one of the few parameters to retain a statistically significant association with increased mortality following multiple hypothesis correction, indicating that this factor should be considered as a marker for poor long-term prognosis among Aboriginal patients with bronchiectasis.

This study has demonstrated that several classic clinical parameters used for predicting survival, exacerbations/hospital admissions or mortality amongst adults with bronchiectasis may not be as applicable to Aboriginal Australians as in other non-Indigenous population (5153). This is due to a significant background presence of comorbidities, high smoking rates, reduced lung function parameters, significantly younger age and generally lower BMI within this cohort. Given the disparity noted in some of the clinical parameters in comparison to other ethnic non-Indigenous patients as noted in this study and in general (5469), moving forwards, it may be time to invest in establishing Indigenous specific bronchiectasis assessment and severity classification tool. This will be very valuable to identify high risk adult Aboriginal patients with bronchiectasis in order to guide clinical decision making and early interventions to reduce overall morbidity and mortality.

5 Limitation

This study’s outcomes pertain to Aboriginal Australian people residing in the TEHS region of the NT of Australia and the results represented in this study cannot be generalised to the wider Aboriginal populations in Australia or for Indigenous people globally. Spirometry data and BMI values were not available for all patients, hence would have introduced a bias in the outcome observed. We also did not have data to represent therapeutic interventions other than inhaled pharmacotherapy use and moreover, we did not have dates of prescription of inhaled pharmacotherapy, nor to assess dosages or adherence to medication which would be significant confounders. Furthermore, with a high presence of COPD, CAD, and CKD in this population, which was observed among both deceased and surviving cohorts, it is uncertain if bronchiectasis is a primary or a secondary cause contributing to mortality. Nonetheless, this is the first study to assess factors predicting survival and mortality in an Aboriginal population, which could be useful to compare for any future similar studies in other Indigenous global populations.

6 Conclusion

Among adult Aboriginal Australian patients diagnosed to have bronchiectasis, advancing age, cultured Pseudomonas and prior ICU visits are strongly associated with mortality. Higher BMI, better lung function parameters, prior positive sputum microbiology for Haemophilus and use of LABA and LAMA may have a favourable effect. However, further studies are warranted in larger cohorts to determine if these findings are replicable. Furthermore, it is clear that efforts must be made to establish bronchiectasis severity assessment tools specific to Indigenous people to stratify high risk patients, so that interventions can be implemented to prevent mortality.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Human Research Ethics Governance/Committee of the TEHS, NT and Menzies School of Health Research (Reference: HREC; 2019-3547). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because Due to this research being a retrospective study–informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee.

Author contributions

SH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. CG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. DE: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. AA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. TH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research received funding through the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) Robert Pierce Grant-In-Aid for Indigenous Lung Health.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) research grant assessment committee members for providing support through the–Robert Pierce Grant-In-Aid for Indigenous Lung Health. We thank Associate Professor Linda Ford–Indigenous Australian woman, a Mak Mak Marranunggu descendent from the Delissaville, Wagait Larrakia Aboriginal Land Trust and the Gurudju Aboriginal Land Trust in the TEHS region of NT in facilitating Mrs. Adriana Ticoalu from the Northern Institute, Faculty of Arts & Society, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia in helping with gathering population data for this study. We also extend our sincere apparition to our former resident medical officer Dr. Eleanor Bulford at the respiratory and sleep service at RDH.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1366037/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

BMI, body mass index; CAD, Coronary artery disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CT, computed tomography; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; HR, hazard ratios; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; LABA, long-acting beta antagonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic agent; NT, northern territory; ORs, odds ratios; TEHS, top end health service.

References

1. King PT. The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. (2009) 4:411–9.

Google Scholar

3. Mateus SP, Ribeiro-Alves M, Salles REB, Costa W, Costa CHD, Lopes AJ, et al. Mortality and comorbidities in patients with bronchiectasis over a 3-year follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). (2022) 101:e32537. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Choi H, Yang B, Kim YJ, Sin S, Jo YS, Kim Y, et al. Increased mortality in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis with respiratory comorbidities. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:7126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86407-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Sin S, Yun SY, Kim JM, Park CM, Cho J, Choi SM, et al. Mortality risk and causes of death in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Respir Res. (2019) 20:271. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1243-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Goeminne PC, Nawrot TS, Ruttens D, Seys S, Dupont LJ. Mortality in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A prospective cohort analysis. Respir Med. (2014) 108:287–96.

Google Scholar

7. Sciosciaa G, Alcaraz-Serranob V, Méndezc R, Gabarrúsd A, Fernández-Baratd L, Menéndezc R, et al. Factors associated with one year mortality in hospitalised patients with exacerbated bronchiectasis. Arch Bronconeumol. (2022) 58:773–7.

Google Scholar

8. Biatobock DR, Paz M, Olmedo DWV, Barlem ELD, Ramos DF. Bronchiectasis: Morbidity and mortality in Brazil and its impact on hospitalization rates. Rev Soc Cient Parag. (2022) 27:61–73.

Google Scholar

9. McDonnell MJ, Aliberti S, Goeminne PC, Restrepo MI, Finch S, Pesci A, et al. Comorbidities and the risk of mortality in patients with bronchiectasis: An international multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. (2016) 4:969–79. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30320-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Australian Bureau of Statistics.Estimates of aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Australians. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016).

Google Scholar

11. McTaggart D. An overview of respiratory disease in indigenous communities: A comparison to the wider Australian population. Med Stud J Aust. (2010) 1:42–4.

Google Scholar

12. Kruavit A, Fox M, Pearson R, Heraganahally S. Chronic respiratory disease in the regional and remote population of the northern territory top end: A perspective from the specialist respiratory outreach service. Aust J Rural Health. (2017) 25:275–84.

Google Scholar

13. Howarth TP, Jersmann HPA, Majoni SW, Mo L, Ben Saad H, Ford LP, et al. The “ABC” of respiratory disorders among adult indigenous people – asthma, bronchiectasis and COPD among aboriginal Australians – a systematic review. BMJ Open Resp Res. (2023) 10:e001738. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001738

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Howarth T, Heraganahally SS, Heraganahally SS. Bronchiectasis among adult first Nations indigenous people – a scoping review. Curr Respir Med Rev. (2023) 19:36–51.

Google Scholar

15. Heraganahally SS, Ghimire RH, Howarth T, Kankanamalage OM, Palmer D, Falhammar H. Comparison and outcomes of emergency department presentations with respiratory disorders among Australian indigenous and non-indigenous patients. BMC Emerg Med. (2022) 22:11. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00570-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Pal A, Howarth TP, Rissel C, Messenger RL, Issac S, Connors C, et al. COPD disease knowledge, self-awareness and reasons for hospital presentations among a predominately Indigenous Australian cohort – a study to explore preventable hospitalization. BMJ Open Res Res. (2022) 9:e001295. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Heraganahally SS, Wasgewatta SL, McNamara K, Eisemberg CC, Budd RC, Mehra S, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in aboriginal patients of the northern territory of Australia: A landscape perspective. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. (2019) 14:2205–17.

Google Scholar

18. Mehra S, Chang AB, Lam CK, Campbell S, Mingi JJ, Thomas I, et al. Bronchiectasis among Australian aboriginal and non-aboriginal patients in the regional and remote population of the northern territory of Australia. Rural Remote Health. (2021) 21:6390. doi: 10.22605/RRH6390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Heraganahally SS, Wasgewatta SL, McNamara K, Mingi JJ, Mehra S, Eisemberg CC, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with and without bronchiectasis in Aboriginal Australians – a comparative study. Int Med J. (2020) 50:1505–13. doi: 10.1111/imj.14718

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Blackall SR, Hong JB, King P, Wong C, Einsiedel L, Rémond MGW, et al. Bronchiectasis in indigenous and non-indigenous residents of Australia and New Zealand. Respirology. (2018) 23:743–9. doi: 10.1111/resp.13280

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Loebinger MR, Wells AU, Hansell DM, Chinyanganya N, Devaraj A, Meister M, et al. Mortality in bronchiectasis: A long-term study assessing the factors influencing survival. Eur Respir J. (2009) 34:843–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00003709

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lee JM, Lee SA, Han CH, Lee SM, Kim CJ, Lee SC, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of mortality in bronchiectasis: A nationwide population-based study. Respir Med. (2021) 180:106370. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106370

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Huang H-Y, Chung F-T, Lin C-Y, Lo C-Y, Huang Y-T, Huang Y-C, et al. Influence of comorbidities and airway clearance on mortality and outcomes of patients with severe bronchiectasis exacerbations in Taiwan. Front Med. (2022) 8:812775. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.812775

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Howarth T, Gahreman D, Ben Saad H, Ng L, Heraganahally SS. Correlation of spirometry indices to chest radiology in the diagnosis of chronic airway disease among regional and rural Indigenous Australians. Int Med J. (2023) 53:1994–2006. doi: 10.1111/imj.16023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Heraganahally SS, Howarth T, Mo L, Sorger L, Ben Saad H. Critical analysis of spirometric patterns in correlation to chest computed tomography among adult Indigenous Australians with chronic airway diseases. Expert Rev Respir Med. (2021) 15:1229–38. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1928496

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. National Health and Medical Research Council.Ethical conduct in research with aboriginal and Torres Strait islander peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia (2018).

Google Scholar

27. Gibbs C, Howarth T, Chen W, Ford PL, Abeyaratne A, et al. Bronchiectasis among indigenous adults in the top end of the northern territory, 2011-2020: A retrospective cohort study. Med J Aust. (2024) 220:188–95. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Phua HP, Lim WY, Ganesan G, Yoong J, Tan KB, Abisheganaden JA, et al. Epidemiology and economic burden of bronchiectasis requiring hospitalisation in Singapore. ERJ Open Res. (2021) 7:00334–2021. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00334-2021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Sánchez-Muñoz G, López de Andrés A, Jiménez-García R, Carrasco-Garrido P, Hernández-Barrera V, Pedraza-Serrano F, et al. Time trends in hospital admissions for bronchiectasis: Analysis of the Spanish national hospital discharge data (2004 to 2013). PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0162282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162282

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Dhar R, Singh S, Talwar D, Murali Mohan BV, Tripathi SK, Swarnakar R, et al. Clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis in India: Data from the EMBARC/respiratory research network of India registry. Eur Respir J. (2023) 61:2200611. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00611-2022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ringshausen FC, de Roux A, Pletz MW, Hämäläinen N, Welte T, Rademacher J. Bronchiectasis-associated hospitalizations in Germany, 2005–2011: A population-based study of disease burden and trends. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e71109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Roberts ME, Lowndes L, Milne DG, Wong CA. Socioeconomic deprivation, readmissions, mortality and acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Intern Med J. (2012) 42:e129–36.

Google Scholar

33. Bibby S, Milne R, Beasley R. Hospital admissions for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in New Zealand. N Z Med J. (2015) 128:30–8.

Google Scholar

34. de Boer S, Lewis CA, Fergusson W, Ellyett K, Wilsher ML. Ethnicity, socioeconomic status and the severity and course of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Intern Med J. (2018) 48:845–50.

Google Scholar

35. Einsiedel L, Pham H, Au V, Hatami S, Wilson K, Spelman T, et al. Predictors of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in Indigenous adult residents of central Australia: Results of a case–control study. ERJ Open Res. (2019) 5:00001–2019.

Google Scholar

36. Steinfort DP, Brady S, Weisinger HS, Einsiedel L. Bronchiectasis in Central Australia: A young face to an old disease. Respir Med. (2008) 102:574–8.

Google Scholar

37. Barton J, Scott L, Maguire G. Bronchiectasis in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. Aust J Rural Health. (2018) 26:238–44.

Google Scholar

38. Vigneault LP, Diendere E, Sohier-Poirier C, Hanna MA, Poirier A, St-Onge M. Acute health care among indigenous patients in Canada: A scoping review. Int J Circumpol Health. (2021) 80:1. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2021.1946324

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Onen ZP, Gulbay BE, Sen E, Yildiz OA, Saryal S, Acican T, et al. Analysis of the factors related to mortality in patients with bronchiectasis. Respir Med. (2007) 101:1390–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.02.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Wilson DO, Donahoe M, Rogers RM, Pennock BE. Metabolic rate and weight loss in chronic obstructive lung disease. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. (1990) 14:7–11. doi: 10.1177/014860719001400107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Agha MA, El Wahsh RA. Basal metabolic rate in bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. (2013) 62:39–44.

Google Scholar

42. Mao B, Lu HW, Li MH, Fan LC, Yang JW, Miao XY, et al. The existence of bronchiectasis predicts worse prognosis in patients with COPD. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:10961. doi: 10.1038/srep10961

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text |

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif