Why do different people with Spinal Cord Injury have differing severity of symptoms with Autonomic Dysreflexia? Exploring relationships of vascular alpha-1 adrenoreceptor and baroreflex sensitivity after SCI

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly have autonomic dysreflexia (AD) with increased sympathetic activity. After SCI, individuals have decreased baroreflex sensitivity and increased vascular responsiveness. Objective: To evalate relationship between baroreflex and blood vessel sensitivity with autonomic dysreflexia symptoms. Design: Case control Setting: Tertiary academic center Patients: 14 individuals with SCI, 17 matched uninjured controls Interventions: All participants quantified AD symptoms using the Autonomic Dysfunction Following SCI (ADFSCI)-AD survey. Participants received three intravenous phenylephrine boluses, reproducibly increasing systolic blood pressure (SBP) 15-40 mmHg. Continuous heart rate (R-R interval, ECG), beat-to-beat blood pressures (finapres), and popliteal artery flow velocity were recorded. Vascular responsiveness (α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity) and heart rate responsiveness to increased SBP (baroreflex sensitivity) were calculated. Main outcome measures: Baroreflex sensitivity after increased SBP; Vascular responsiveness through quantified mean arterial pressure (MAP) 2-minute area under the curve and change in vascular resistance. Results: SCI and control cohorts were well-matched with mean age 31.9 and 29.6 years (p=0.41), 21.4% and 17.6% female respectively. Baseline MAP (p=0.83) and R-R interval (p=0.39) were similar. ADFSCI-AD scores were higher following SCI (27.9+/-22.9 vs 4.2+/-2.9 in controls, p=0.002). To quantify SBP response, MAP area under the curve was normalized to dose/bodyweight. Individuals with SCI had significantly larger responses (0.26+/-0.19 mmHg*s/kg*ug) than controls (0.06+/-0.06 mmHg*s/kg*ug, p=0.002). Similarly, leg vascular resistance increased after SCI (24% vs 6% to a normalized dose, p=0.007). Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly lower after SCI (15.0+/-8.3 vs 23.7+/-9.3 ms/mmHg, p=0.01). ADFSCI-AD subscore had no meaningful correlation with vascular responsiveness (R2=0.008) or baroreflex sensitivity (R2=0.092) after SCI. Conclusions: While this confirms smaller previous studies suggesting increased α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity and lower baroreflex sensitivity in individuals with SCI, these differences lacked correlation to increased symptoms of AD. Further research into physiologic mechanisms to explain why some individuals with SCI develop symptoms is needed.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT04493372

Funding Statement

This study was funded by K23HD102663 (PI: Solinsky) through the National Institutes of Health/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Institutional Review Board of Mass Gen Brigham gave ethical approval for this work; Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic gave ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study will be available upon reasonable request to the authors following study completion and analysis.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif