Modifiable risk factors, APOE and risk of Alzheimer disease: one size does not fit all

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluating the generalizability of dementia risk scores, primarily developed in non-Latinx White (NLW) participants, and interactions with genetic risk factors in diverse populations is crucial for addressing health disparities. Methods: We analyzed the association of the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) and modified CAIDE (mCAIDE) scores with dementia risk using logistic regression models stratified by race/ethnicity in NACC and ADNI, and assessed their interaction with APOE. Results: Higher CAIDE scores were associated with an increased risk of dementia in Asian, Latinx, and NLW participants but not in Black participants. In contrast, higher mCAIDE scores were also associated with an increased risk of dementia in Black participants. Unfavorable mCAIDE risk profiles exacerbated the APOE*e4 risk effect and attenuated the APOE*e2 protective effect. Discussion: Our findings underscore the importance of evaluating the validity of dementia risk scores in diverse populations for their use in personalized medicine approaches to promote brain health.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a National Alzheimers Coordinating Center New Investigator Award (SJA) and by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R35AG071916 KY)

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): https://adni.loni.usc.edu/ National Alzheiemr's Co-ordinating Center (NACC): https://naccdata.org/ Participants provided informed consent, and institutional review board approval was locally obtained.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif