Stanca M, Căpîlna ME. Prognostic factors associated with 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy at a tertiary care center in Eastern Europe. Diagnostics. 2021;11(3):570.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dizon DS, Mackay HJ, Thomas GM, Werner TL, Kohn EC, Hess D, Rose PG, Covens AL. State of the science in cervical cancer: where we are today and where we need to go. Cancer. 2014;120(15):2282–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28722.
Warnat P, Eils R, Brors B. Cross-platform analysis of cancer microarray data improves gene expression based classification of phenotypes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:1–5.
Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, Gaasterland T. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):365–71.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brazma A, Vilo J. Gene expression data analysis. FEBS Lett. 2000;480(1):17–24.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Speed TP, Bittner ML, Chen Y, Dorsel AN, Dougherty ER. Microarrays: optical technologies and informatics. InSPIE, Bellingham, WA. 2001
Li J, Li YX, Li YY. Differential regulatory analysis based on coexpression network in cancer research. Biomed Res Int [Epub ahead of print]. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4241293.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu Y. Active learning with support vector machine applied to gene expression data for cancer classification. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004;44(6):1936–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci049810a. (PMID: 15554662).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Njoroge E, Alty SR, Gani MR, Alkatib M. Classification of cervical cancer cells using FTIR data. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:5338–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260024. (PMID: 17945893).
Cai S, Yu X, Gu Z, Yang Q, Wen B, Sheng J, Guan R. A 10-gene prognostic methylation signature for stage I-III cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(5):1275–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05524-3. (Epub 2020 Apr 9 PMID: 32274635).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Alles MC, Gardiner-Garden M, Nott DJ, Wang Y, Foekens JA, Sutherland RL, Musgrove EA, Ormandy CJ. Meta-analysis and gene set enrichment relative to er status reveal elevated activity of MYC and E2F in the “basal” breast cancer subgroup. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3): e4710.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chow YP, Alias H, Jamal R. Meta-analysis of gene expression in relapsed childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:1.
Dong H, Hong S, Xu X, Xiao Y, Jin L, Xiong M. Meta-analysis and network analysis of five ovarian cancer gene expression dataset. In 2010 Third International Joint Conference on Computational Science and Optimization (Vol. 1, pp. 242–246). IEEE. 2010
Manawapat-Klopfer A, Thomsen LT, Martus P, Munk C, Russ R, Gmuender H, Frederiksen K, Haedicke-Jarboui J, Stubenrauch F, Kjaer SK, Iftner T. TMEM45A, SERPINB5 and p16INK4A transcript levels are predictive for development of high-grade cervical lesions. Am J Cancer Res. 2016;6(7):1524.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Espinosa AM, Alfaro A, Roman-Basaure E, Guardado-Estrada M, Palma Í, Serralde C, Medina I, Juárez E, Bermúdez M, Márquez E, Borges-Ibáñez M. Mitosis is a source of potential markers for screening and survival and therapeutic targets in cervical cancer. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2): e55975.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, Yefanov A. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41(D1):D991–5.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chandrashekar G, Sahin F. A survey on feature selection methods. Comput Electr Eng. 2014;40(1):16–28.
留言 (0)