Anukriti, S., Herrera-Almanza, C., Pathak, P. K., & Karra, M. (2020). Curse of the Mummy-ji: The influence of mothers-in-law on women in India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 102(5), 1328–1351. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12114

Article  Google Scholar 

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basu, J., & Ray, R. (2000). The three faces of love: College students’ perception of the spouse, date and cross-sex friend. Psychology and Developing Societies, 12(2), 177–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133360001200205

Article  Google Scholar 

Bateson, P. (1983). Optimal outbreeding. In P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate Choice (pp. 257–277). Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar 

Bereczkei, T., & Gyuris, P. (2009). Oedipus complex, mate choice, imprinting; An evolutionary reconsideration of a Freudian concept based on empirical studies. Mankind Quarterly, 50(1–2), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2009.50.1.3

Article  Google Scholar 

Bhugra, D., & Bhui, K. (2002). Is the Oedipal complex universal? Problems for sexual and relationship psychotherapy across culture. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 17(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990220107992

Article  Google Scholar 

Biton-Bereby, L., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2019). Attachment and the Oedipus complex: Attachment orientations moderate the effects of priming Oedipal representations on sexual attraction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 36(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000238

Article  Google Scholar 

Biton-Bereby, L., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2020). Attachment and the Oedipus complex: Attachment orientations moderate the effects of priming Oedipal representations on the construal of romantic relationships. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 37(4), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000290

Article  Google Scholar 

Blankinship, T. T. (2008). Characteristic preferences in mate selection among college students: A comparison study spanning the late twentieth century into the early twenty-first century (Publication No. 1459955) [Master's thesis, University of Central Oklahoma]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Bohn, J., Holtmann, J., Luhmann, M., Koch, T., & Eid, M. (2020). Attachment to parents and well-being after high school graduation: A study using self- and parent ratings. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 2493–2525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00190-y

Article  Google Scholar 

Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

Bressan, P. (2020). In humans, only attractive females fulfil their sexually imprinted preferences for eye colour. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62781-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Bressan, P., & Damian, V. (2018). Fathers’ eye colour sways daughters’ choice of both long- and short-term partners. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23784-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M. (2007). The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 502–512.

Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2018). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cepukiene, V. (2019). Does relationship satisfaction always mean satisfaction? development of the couple relationship satisfaction scale. Journal of Relationships Research, 10(e14), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2019.12

Article  Google Scholar 

Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Epstein, E., & Guttman, R. (1984). Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome. Social Biology, 31(3–4), 243–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1984.9988579

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.

Fife, D. (2020). The Eight Steps of Data Analysis: A Graphical Framework to Promote Sound Statistical Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1054–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620917333

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fraley, R. C., & Marks, M. J. (2010). Westermarck, Freud, and the incest taboo: Does familial resemblance activate sexual attraction?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1202–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210377180.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freud, S., & Whiteside, S. (2006). The psychology of love. (A. Phillips, Ed.). Penguin UK.

Freud, S. (1964). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. (J. Strachey, Ed.). Macmillan.

Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with Item Response Theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Furler, K., Gomez, V., & Grob, A. (2014). Personality perceptions and relationship satisfaction in couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.02.003

Article  Google Scholar 

Furnham, A. (2009). Sex differences in mate selection preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.013

Article  Google Scholar 

Geher, G. (2000). Perceived and actual characteristics of parents and partners: A test of a Freudian model of mate selection. Current Psychology, 19(3), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-000-1015-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Glubo, H. (2012). Mate selection in India: A health psychological perspective. (Publication No. 3537540) [Doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Griffee, K., Stroebel, S. S., O’Keefe, S. L., Harper-Dorton, K. V., Beard, K. W., Young, D. H., Swindell, S., Stroupe, W. E., Steele, K., Lawhon, M., & Kuo, S. Y. (2017). Sexual imprinting of offspring on their parents and siblings. Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1307632

Article  Google Scholar 

Guarnieri, S., Smorti, M., & Tani, F. (2015). Attachment relationships and life satisfaction during emerging adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0655-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Gyuris, P., Járai, R., & Bereczkei, T. (2010). The effect of childhood experiences on mate choice in personality traits: Homogamy and sexual imprinting. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1556/MPSzle.65.2010.1.9

Article  Google Scholar 

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heffernan, M. E., Chong, J. Y., & Fraley, R. C. (2018). Are people attracted to others who resemble their opposite-sex parents? An examination of mate preferences and parental ethnicity among biracial individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(7), 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618794679

Article  Google Scholar 

Heffernan, M. E., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). How early experiences shape attraction, partner preferences, and attachment dynamics. In V. Zayas & C. Hazan (Eds.), Bases of Adult Attachment: Linking Brain, Mind and Behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9622-9

Heffernan, M. E. (2015). Adult mate preferences are not more closely associated with the opposite-sex parent than the same-sex parent: examinations focusing on biracial individuals and parental ethnicity. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/78604/HEFFERNAN-DISSERTATION-2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Holt, L. J., Mattanah, J. F., & Long, M. W. (2018). Change in parental and peer relationship quality during emerging adulthood: Implications for academic, social, and emotional functioning. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(5), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517697856

Article  Google Scholar 

Irwin, D. E., & Price, T. (1999). Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity, 82(4), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6885270

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.

Google Scholar 

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-04371-004

Jonason, P. K., Garcia, J. R., Webster, G. D., Li, N. P., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). Relationship dealbreakers: Traits people avoid in potential mates. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215609064

Article  Google Scholar 

Kakar, S., & Ross, J. M. (2012). Mother love: When desire becomes reality. In Tales of Love, Sex, and Danger (pp. 150–172). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198072560.003.0007

Kenny, M. E. (1987). The extent and function of parental attachment among first-year college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02141544

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kochendorfer, L. B., & Kerns, K. A. (2017). Perceptions of parent-child attachment relationships and friendship qualities: Predictors of romantic relationship involvement and quality in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 1009–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0645-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kocsor, F., Saxton, T. K., Láng, A., & Bereczkei, T. (2016). Preference for faces resembling opposite-sex parents is moderated by emotional closeness in childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.065

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar, S. A., & Mattanah, J. F. (2016). Parental attachment, romantic competence, relationship satisfaction, and psychosocial adjustment in emerging adulthood. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12161

Article  Google Scholar 

Li, D., Li, D., & Yang, K. (2020). Interparental conflict and Chinese emerging adults’ romantic relationship quality: Indirect pathways through attachment to parents and interpersonal security. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(2), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519865955

Article