Application of the Stanford Biodesign Framework in Healthcare Innovation Training and Commercialization of Market Appropriate Products: A Scoping Review

Schwarz T, Schmidt AE, Bobek J, Ladurner J. Barriers to accessing health care for people with chronic conditions: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Services Research. 2022;22(1):1037. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08426-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Augustin DA, Denend L, Wall J, Krummel T, Azagury DE. The Biodesign Model: Training Physician Innovators and Entrepreneurs. In: Cohen MS, Kao L, eds. Success in Academic Surgery: Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019:71–88.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Day-Duro E, Lubitsh G, Smith G. Understanding and investing in healthcare innovation and collaboration. J Health Organ Manag 2020;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-07-2019-0206

Augustin DA, Chertow GM, Azagury DE. Innovation in hemodialysis: Using the Biodesign process to identify unmet needs. J Vasc Access. 2021;22(4):509–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820913692

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brinton TJ, Kurihara CQ, Camarillo DB, et al. Outcomes from a postgraduate biomedical technology innovation training program: the first 12 years of Stanford Biodesign. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(9):1803–1810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0761-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nimgaonkar A, Yock PG, Brinton TJ, Krummel T, Pasricha PJ. Gastroenterology and biodesign: contributing to the future of our specialty. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(2):258–262. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ray PP, Amaral JF, Hinoul P. Innovation Best Practices in the Medical Device Industry. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;20(2):90–93. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2017.04.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rivers CA, Roher H, Boissonault BA, Klinger CA, Mirza RM, Foty R. Examining Fall Risk Assessment in Geriatric Rehabilitation Settings Using Translational Research. Rehabil Nurs. 2021;46(3):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1097/rnj.0000000000000259

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schwartz JG, Kumar UN, Azagury DE, Brinton TJ, Yock PG. Needs-Based Innovation in Cardiovascular Medicine: The Stanford Biodesign Process. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016;1(6):541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.06.011

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wall J, Wynne E, Krummel T. Biodesign process and culture to enable pediatric medical technology innovation. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015;24(3):102–106. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.02.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wynne EK, Krummel TM. Innovation within a university setting. Surgery. 2016;160(6):1427–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.059

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barbazzeni B, Fritzsche H, Friebe M. Forecasting the Future of Healthcare Democratization Forecasting the Future of Healthcare Democratization. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering. 2021;7(2):155–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2021-2040

Article  Google Scholar 

Gough P, Yoo S, Tomitsch M, Ahmadpour N. Applying Bioaffordances through an Inquiry-Based Model: A Literature Review of Interactive Biodesign. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2021;37(17):1583–1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898846

Article  Google Scholar 

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Article  Google Scholar 

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020;18(10). https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Fulltext/2020/10000/Updated_methodological_guidance_for_the_conduct_of.4.aspx

Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Vol 11: sage; 1988.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Article  Google Scholar 

Bruzzi MS, Linehan JH. BioInnovate Ireland–fostering entrepreneurial activity through medical device innovation training. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(9):1834–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0787-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chaturvedi J, Logan A, Narayan G, Kuttappa S. A structured process for unmet clinical need analysis for medical device innovation in India: Early experiences. BMJ Innovations. 2015;1(3):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2014-000010

Article  Google Scholar 

Dharmawan R, Ho H, Ng HHM, Iyer NG, Tan HK, Tan NC. Implementing the Biodesign Process for Medical Device Innovation in Head and Neck Surgery. Surg Innov. 2020;27(6):653–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620943796

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fritzsche H, Barbazzeni B, Mahmeen M, Haider S, Friebe M. A Structured Pathway Toward Disruption: A Novel HealthTec Innovation Design Curriculum With Entrepreneurship in Mind. Front Public Health. 2021;9:715768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.715768

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fritzsche H, Mahbub E, Boese A, Friebe M. State-of-The-Art: Biodesign based Innovation Ecosystems in Europe. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering. 2021;7(2):231–234. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2021-2059

Article  Google Scholar 

Fuerch JH, Wang P, Van Wert R, Denend L. Turning Practicing Surgeons Into Health Technology Innovators: Outcomes From the Stanford Biodesign Faculty Fellowship. Surg Innov. 2021;28(1):134–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620984338

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greene A, Zhang Y, Asan O, et al. Successful application of the innovation process to a case of Floyd Type I tracheal agenesis. Surg Open Sci. 2023;11:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kiriyama H, Kakihiana T, Maeda Y, et al. Cultivating design thinking skills through the biodesign process in Japan. BMJ Innovations. 2022;8(4):273–277. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000923

Article  Google Scholar 

Krummel TM, Gertner M, Makower J, et al. Inventing our future: Training the next generation of surgeon innovators. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 2006;15(4):309–318. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2006.07.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maloney LM, Hakimi M, Hays T, et al. Learning the Language of Medical Device Innovation: A Longitudinal Interdisciplinary Elective for Medical Students. Acad Med. 2022;97(9):1341–1345. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000004723

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McGloughlin EK, Anglim P, Keogh I, Sharif F. Innovation for the future of Irish MedTech industry: retrospective qualitative review of impact of BioInnovate Ireland’s clinical fellows. BMJ Innov. 2018;4(1):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000184

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakao K, Umezu M, Iwasaki K. Biodesign program introduction in Japan: promotion of entrepreneurship and viewpoints of education on medical technology innovation. J Artif Organs. 2022;25(4):350–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-022-01317-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Perrone KH, Blevins KS, Denend L, Fan R, Huelman J, Wall JK. Initial experiences with virtual reality as a tool for observation in needs-driven health technology innovation. BMJ Innovations. 2020;6(1):10–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000308

Article  Google Scholar 

Preiksaitis C, Dayton JR, Kabeer R, Bunney G, Boukhman M. Teaching Principles of Medical Innovation and Entrepreneurship Through Hackathons: Case Study and Qualitative Analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e43916. https://doi.org/10.2196/43916

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Robinson TN. A Biodesign Approach to Designing, Packaging, and Scaling a Pediatric Weight Management Program: The Stanford CORD 3.0 Project. Child Obes. 2021;17(S1):S79–s85. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2021.0182

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sista AK, Hwang GL, Hovsepian DM, et al. Applying a structured innovation process to interventional radiology: a single-center experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(4):488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2011.12.029

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wall J, Hellman E, Denend L, et al. The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(5):1163–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang JK, Pamnani RD, Capasso R, Chang RT. An Extended Hackathon Model for Collaborative Education in Medical Innovation. J Med Syst. 2018;42(12):239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1098-z

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bradbury-Jones C, Aveyard H, Herber OR, Isham L, Taylor J, O’Malley L. Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2021:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1899596

Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: Transforming theory into practice. Medical Teacher. 2012;34(2):161–164. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.643264

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roberts JP, Fisher TR, Trowbridge MJ, Bent C. A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation. Healthcare. 2016;4(1):11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beauchamp MR, McEwan D, Waldhauser KJ. Team building: conceptual, methodological, and applied considerations. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017;16:114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.031

Article  PubMed 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif