Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Siegal SR, Dolan JP, Hunter JG (2017) Modern diagnosis and treatment of hiatal hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(8):1145–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1606-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lidor AO, Steele KE, Stem M, Fleming RM, Schweitzer MA, Marohn MR (2015) Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. JAMA Surg 150(5):424–431. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.25

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR et al (2013) Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 27(12):4409–4428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3173-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Targarona EM, Bendahan G, Balague C, Garriga J, Trias M (2004) Mesh in the hiatus: a controversial issue. Arch Surg 139(12):1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.12.1286. (discussion 1296)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rajkomar K, Wong CS, Gall L et al (2023) Laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair with mesh reinforcement versus suture cruroplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02783-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Analatos A, Håkanson BS, Lundell L, Lindblad M, Thorell A (2020) Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Br J Surg 107(13):1731–1740. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11917

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li J, Cheng T (2019) Mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair: the tip of the iceberg? Hernia 23(6):1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02011-w

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spiro C, Quarmby N, Gananadha S (2020) Mesh-related complications in paraoesophageal repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 34(10):4257–4280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07723-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu DS, Allan Z, Wong DJ et al (2023) Pre-existing hiatal mesh increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery: a retrospective multicenter study. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.029

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Symons NR, Purkayastha S, Dillemans B et al (2011) Laparoscopic revision of failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg 202(3):336–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.03.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Furnée EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Gooszen HG (2009) Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 13(8):1539–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0873-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ljungdalh JS, Rubin KH, Durup J, Houlind KC (2020) Reoperation after antireflux surgery: a population-based cohort study. Br J Surg 107(12):1633–1639. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11672

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Beek DB, Auyang ED, Soper NJ (2011) A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. Surg Endosc 25(3):706–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1254-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Castillo-Larios R, Gunturu NS, Cornejo J et al (2023) Redo fundoplication vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion for failed anti-reflux surgery: which is better? Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10074-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2019) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

Review Manager Wed (RevMan Web) (2020) Version 5.4.1. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.revman.cochrane.org

Asti E, Lovece A, Bonavina L et al (2016) Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair. Surg Endosc 30(12):5404–5409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4897-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Braghetto I, Korn O, Csendes A, Burdiles P, Valladares H, Brunet L (2010) Postoperative results after laparoscopic approach for treatment of large hiatal hernias: is mesh always needed? Is the addition of an antireflux procedure necessary? Int Surg 95(1):80–87

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dallemagne B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C (2011) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg 253(2):291–296. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff44c0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dara V, Croo A, Peirsman A, Pattyn P (2019) Necessity of fundoplication and mesh in the repair of the different types of paraesophageal hernia. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 82(2):251–256

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP (2002) A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 137(6):649–652. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.6.649

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Pasiut M, Haas CF, Pointner R (2002) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery with routine mesh-hiatoplasty in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 6(3):347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00025-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Asche KU, Pointner R (2005) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 140(1):40–48. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.1.40

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2006) Impact of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure on esophageal body motility: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 141(7):625–632. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.7.625

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hui TT, Thoman DS, Spyrou M, Phillips EH (2001) Mesh crural repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias. Am Surg 67(12):1170–1174

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ilyashenko VV, Grubnyk VV, Grubnik VV (2018) Laparoscopic management of large hiatal hernia: mesh method with the use of ProGrip mesh versus standard crural repair. Surg Endosc 32(8):3592–3598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6087-2

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jacobs M, Gomez E, Plasencia G et al (2007) Use of surgisis mesh in laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 17(5):365–368. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e318123fc49

Article  Google Scholar 

Kamolz T, Granderath FA, Bammer T, Pasiut M, Pointner R (2002) Dysphagia and quality of life after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with and without prostetic reinforcement of the hiatal crura. Surg Endosc 16(4):572–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9136-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koetje JH, Oor JE, Roks DJ, Van Westreenen HL, Hazebroek EJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB (2017) Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh. Surg Endosc 31(9):3673–3680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5405-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Latzko M, Borao F, Squillaro A, Mansson J, Barker W, Baker T (2014) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2014.00009

Article  Google Scholar 

Müller-Stich BP, Holzinger F, Kapp T, Klaiber C (2006) Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 20(3):380–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2272-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J et al (2006) Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244(4):481–490. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000237759.42831.03

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG et al (2011) Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 213(4):461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oor JE, Roks DJ, Koetje JH et al (2018) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh. Surg Endosc 32(11):4579–4589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6211-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ozmen MM, Bilgic IC, Kilinc U, Gelece

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif