Addressing racial disparities in prostate cancer pathology prediction models: external validation and comparison of four models of pathological outcome prediction before radical prostatectomy in the multiethnic SEARCH cohort

Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, An Y, Barocas D, Bitting R, et al. Prostate Cancer, Version 4.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21:1067–96.

Ötleş E, Denton BT, Qu B, Murali A, Merdan S, Auffenberg GB, et al. Development and validation of models to predict pathological outcomes of radical prostatectomy in regional and national cohorts. J Urol. 2022;207:358–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brady Urological Institute. Partin Tables Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. 2021. Available from: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/brady-urology-institute/conditions_and_treatments/prostate_cancer/risk_assessment_tools/partin-tables.html.

Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Gallina A, Suardi N, et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol. 2012;61:480–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Rabbani F, Gerigk C, et al. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;170:1798–803.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Dynamic Prostate Cancer Nomogram: Coefficients. 2022. Available from: https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/pre_op/coefficients.

Bandini M, Marchioni M, Preisser F, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Fossati N, et al. A head-to-head comparison of four prognostic models for prediction of lymph node invasion in African American and Caucasian individuals. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5:449–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Preisser F, van den Bergh RCN, Gandaglia G, Ost P, Surcel CI, Sooriakumaran P, et al. Effect of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with D’Amico Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study. J Urol. 2020;203:338–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimino S, Reale G, Castelli T, Favilla V, Giardina R, Russo GI, et al. Comparison between Briganti, Partin and MSKCC tools in predicting positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol. 2017;51:345–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Milonas D, Venclovas Z, Muilwijk T, Jievaltas M, Joniau S. External validation of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram and prediction of optimal candidate for lymph node dissection in clinically localized prostate cancer. Cent Eur J Urol. 2020;73:19–25.

Google Scholar 

Hueting TA, Cornel EB, Somford DM, Jansen H, van Basten JA, Pleijhuis RG, et al. External Validation of Models Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1:411–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bandini M, Marchioni M, Pompe RS, Tian Z, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, et al. First North American validation and head-to-head comparison of four preoperative nomograms for prediction of lymph node invasion before radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2018;121:592–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diamand R, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M, Oderda M, Benamran D, Fiard G, et al. External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2021;79:180–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hall WA, Fishbane N, Liu Y, Xu MJ, Davicioni E, Mahal BA, et al. Development and Validation of a Genomic Tool to Predict Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4:1228–38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eissa A, Elsherbiny A, Zoeir A, Sandri M, Pirola G, Puliatti S, et al. Reliability of the different versions of Partin tables in predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019;71:457–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blas L, Shiota M, Nagakawa S, Tsukahara S, Matsumoto T, Lee K, et al. Validation of user-friendly models predicting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer patients. Asian J Urol. 2023;10:81–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:233–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhu M, Gao J, Han F, Yin L, Zhang L, Yang Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of prediction models for extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Insights Imaging. 2023;14:140.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mehralivand S, Shih JH, Harmon S, Smith C, Bloom J, Czarniecki M, et al. A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI. Radiology. 2019;290:709–19.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nyarangi-Dix J, Wiesenfarth M, Bonekamp D, Hitthaler B, Schütz V, Dieffenbacher S, et al. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Disease-A Risk Model for Patient-tailored Risk Stratification When Planning Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6:1205–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lillard JW Jr., Moses KA, Mahal BA, George DJ. Racial disparities in Black men with prostate cancer: A literature review. Cancer. 2022;128:3787–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif