CLINICAL SAMPLING OF SMALL INTESTINE LUMINAL CONTENT FOR MICROBIOME MULTI-OMICS ANALYSIS: A PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THE SMALL INTESTINE MICROBIOME ASPIRATION (SIMBA) CAPSULE AND BENCHMARKING AGAINST ENDOSCOPY

Abstract

Objective: The small intestine (SI) microbiome is increasingly implicated in both functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders and a wide range of systemic diseases. However, owing to limitations of traditional GI sampling approaches, the SI remains challenging to directly access on a large scale. This work presents the Small Intestinal MicroBiome Aspiration Capsule (SIMBA) as an effective means for sampling SI luminal content. Design: In an observational clinical study, SIMBA capsules were ingested by both healthy individuals and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) patients on two successive visits. On a first visit, X-ray scans were used to evaluate SI targeting accuracy. On a second visit, SIMBA capsule ingestion was paired with duodenal endoscopy and saliva samples for reference. For both visits, SIMBA capsules were retrieved with matching fecal samples to evaluate effective sealing during GI transit. Results: X-ray monitoring confirmed all capsules sampled from the distal small intestine with a few (5 of 49) sealing in the proximal colon. Overall, 94% of capsules were retrieved by subjects with median total gut transit time of 47 hours (IQR 24-54). Capsule sampling location and duration was also not significantly affected by IBS. Multi-omics analysis showed that microbiota and metabolomic composition of SIMBA capsules were significantly different to fecal samples, and similar to endoscopic aspirate and cytological brush sampling. Conclusions: The SIMBA capsule reliably captures and preserves SI luminal fluid in a clinically relevant context that is suitable for multi-omics data analysis, comparable to duodenal aspirate, and complements fecal sampling in its broad applicability of use.

Competing Interest Statement

CNA has an equity interest in and is a member of the scientific advisory board for Nimble Science.

Clinical Trial

NCT04094558

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC IRAP), an Alberta Innovate Accelerating Innovations into CarE (AICE) grant, and partially by a Clinical Problems Incubator Grant from the Snyder Institute for Chronic Disease at the University of Calgary. M.M.B. is supported by a Grant from MITACs as well as a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; DG04547). I.A.L. is supported by an Alberta Innovates Translational Health Chair. Metabolomics data were acquired at the Calgary Metabolomics Research Facility, which is part of the Alberta Centre for Advanced Diagnostics (ACAD; PrairiesCan RIE #22734) and is supported by the International Microbiome Centre and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI-JELF 34986).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was conducted under the guidance and approval of the University of Calgary Conjoint Ethics Review Board (REB19-0957) and Investigational Testing Authorization from Health Canada (ITA 310032).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors, and will be made available online in the NCBI BioProject database upon peer reviewed publication.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif