Can serum progesterone concentration direct a fresh or freeze-all transfer strategy in the first in vitro fertilisation cycle?

Berntsen S, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, et al. The health of children conceived by ART: ‘the chicken or the egg?’. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(2):137–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pelkonen S, Koivunen R, Gissler M, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Suikkari AM, Hyden-Granskog C, et al. Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995-2006. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(4):914–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh B, Reschke L, Segars J, Baker VL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the potential importance of the corpus luteum in preventing obstetrical complications. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(2):252–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(1):35–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):126–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, Huynh BG, Ha DT, Pham TD, et al. IVF transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):137–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stormlund S, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Bogstad J, Praetorius L, Nielsen HS, et al. Freeze-all versus fresh blastocyst transfer strategy during in vitro fertilisation in women with regular menstrual cycles: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020;5(370):m2519.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wong KM, van Wely M, Verhoeve HR, Kaaijk EM, Mol F, van der Veen F, et al. Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(4):998–1006.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10(7):CD009154.

Google Scholar 

Yu Y, Zhao S, Li Y, Niu Y, Wei D, Zhang S, et al. Live birth after a freeze-only strategy versus fresh embryo transfer in three randomized trials considering progesterone concentration. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(3):395–401.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang A, Santistevan A, Hunter Cohn K, Copperman A, Nulsen J, Miller BT, et al. Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study: contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):254–61 e4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Correia KF, Dodge LE, Farland LV, Hacker MR, Ginsburg E, Whitcomb BW, et al. Confounding and effect measure modification in reproductive medicine research. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(5):1013–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu KL, Yang R, Xu H, Mol BW, Li R, Wang R. Anti-Mullerian hormone in guiding the selection of a freeze-all versus a fresh embryo transfer strategy: a cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(10):2325–33.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chambers GM, Paul RC, Harris K, Fitzgerald O, Boothroyd CV, Rombauts L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success. Med J Aust. 2017;207(3):114–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stern JE, Brown MB, Luke B, Wantman E, Lederman A, Missmer SA, et al. Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1334–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Youssef MA, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Mochtar MH, Griesinger G, Nagi Mohesen M, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct;31(10):CD008046.

Google Scholar 

Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2000;55:101–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang R, McLernon DJ, Lai S, Showell MG, Chen ZJ, Wei D, et al. Individual participant data meta-analysis of trials comparing frozen versus fresh embryo transfer strategy (INFORM): a protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(7):e062578.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rozen G, Rogers P, Mizrachi Y, Teh WT, Parmar C, Polyakov A. Serum progesterone concentration on the day of embryo transfer in stimulated cycles does not correlate with reproductive outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45(6):1160–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Venetis CA, Mol BW, Kolibianakis EM. Low as well as high serum P4 levels in the early and mid-luteal phase reduce the chance of a live birth following IVF treatment with fresh embryo transfer: where is the evidence? Hum Reprod. 2018;33(12):2312–3.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif