Angiography-derived physiological assessment after percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions

Azzalini L, Carlino M, Bellini B et al (2020) Long-term outcomes of chronic total occlusion recanalization versus percutaneous coronary intervention for complex non-occlusive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 125(2):182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.034

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kotsia A, Navara R, Michael TT et al (2015) The AngiographiC Evaluation of the everolimus-eluting stent in Chronic Total Occlusion (ACE-CTO) study. J Invasive Cardiol 27(9):393–400

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Di Mario C, Mashayekhi KA, Garbo R, Pyxaras SA, Ciardetti N, Werner GS (2022) Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions. EuroIntervention 18(7):535–561. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Butala NM, Tamez H, Secemsky EA et al (2022) Predicting residual angina after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the OPEN-CTO registry. J Am Heart Assoc 11(10):e024056. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024056

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Biscaglia S, Uretsky B, Barbato E et al (2021) Invasive coronary physiology after stent implantation: another step toward precision medicine. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14(3):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.055

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biscaglia S, Uretsky BF, Tebaldi M et al (2022) Angio-based fractional flow reserve, functional pattern of coronary artery disease, and prediction of percutaneous coronary intervention result: a proof-of-concept study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 36(4):645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-021-07162-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tu S, Ding D, Chang Y, Li C, Wijns W, Xu B (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: a novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 97(Suppl 2):1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29592

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uretsky BF, Agarwal SK, Vallurupalli S et al (2022) Trans-stent FFR gradient as a modifiable integrant in predicting long-term target vessel failure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 15(21):2192–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.036

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang H, Lim H, Yoon M et al (2020) Usefulness of the trans-stent fractional flow reserve gradient for predicting clinical outcomes. Cathet Cardio Intervent 95(5):E123–E129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28363

Article  Google Scholar 

Collet C, Sonck J, Vandeloo B et al (2019) Measurement of hyperemic pullback pressure gradients to characterize patterns of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 74(14):1772–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.072

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dai N, Zhang R, Yuan S et al (2022) Prognostic implications of quantitative flow ratio-derived physiological 2-dimensional residual disease patterns after stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 15(16):1624–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.06.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scarsini R, Fezzi S, Pesarini G et al (2022) Impact of physiologically diffuse versus focal pattern of coronary disease on quantitative flow reserve diagnostic accuracy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 99(3):736–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Fineschi M et al (2018) Evolving routine standards in invasive hemodynamic assessment of coronary stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(15):1482–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.037

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Azzalini L, Poletti E, Demir OM et al (2019) Impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve measurement on procedural management and clinical outcomes: the REPEAT-FFR study. J Invasive Cardiol 31(8):229–234

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Collison D, Didagelos M, Aetesam-ur-Rahman M et al (2021) Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR). Eur Heart J 42(45):4656–4668. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Neleman T, Scoccia A, Masdjedi K et al (2022) The prognostic value of angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention: the FAST outcome study. Int J Cardiol 359:14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biscaglia S, Tebaldi M, Brugaletta S et al (2019) Prognostic value of QFR measured immediately after successful stent implantation: the international multicenter prospective HAWKEYE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12(20):2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Keulards DCJ, Vlaar PJ, Wijnbergen I, Pijls NHJ, Teeuwen K (2021) Coronary physiology before and after chronic total occlusion treatment: what does it tell us? Neth Heart J 29(1):22–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01470-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Castaldi G, Benedetti A, Zivelonghi C et al (2023) A glimpse into the future of the percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions. Minerva Cardiol Angiol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5683.23.06293-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tu S, Ding D, Chang Y, Li C, Wijns W, Xu B (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: a novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 97(S2):1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29592

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van der Hoeven NW, Janssens GN, de Waard GA et al (2019) Temporal changes in coronary hyperemic and resting hemodynamic indices in nonculprit vessels of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol 4(8):736–744. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2138

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lauri F, Macaya F, Mejía-Rentería H et al (2020) Angiography-derived functional assessment of non-culprit coronary stenoses in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention 15(18):e1594–e1601. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01165

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faria D, Hennessey B, Shabbir A et al (2023) Functional coronary angiography for the assessment of the epicardial vessels and the microcirculation. EuroIntervention 19(3):203–221. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00969

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scoccia A, Scarparo P, Neleman T et al (2022) Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve after chronic coronary total occlusion recanalization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 100(6):964–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30439

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Erriquez A, Uretsky BF, Brugaletta S et al (2022) Impact of trans-stent gradient on outcome after PCI: results from a HAWKEYE substudy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38(12):2819–2827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02708-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif