Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H et al (2022) Current and future burden of breast cancer: global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast 66:15–23

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu J, Li C, Gensheimer M et al (2021) Radiological tumor classification across imaging modality and histology. Nat Mach Intell 3:787–798

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Spak DA, Plaxco JS, Santiago L, Dryden MJ, Dogan BE (2017) BI-RADS fifth edition: a summary of changes. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:179–190

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ku YJ, Kim HH, Cha JH et al (2016) Correlation between MRI and the level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:1146–1151

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moon HG, Kim N, Jeong S et al (2015) The clinical significance and molecular features of the spatial tumor shapes in breast cancers. PLoS ONE 10:e0143811

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

He N, Wu Y-P, Kong Y et al (2016) The utility of breast cone-beam computed tomography, ultrasound, and digital mammography for detecting malignant breast tumors: a prospective study with 212 patients. Eur J Radiol 85:392–403

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao B, Zhang X, Cai W, Conover D, Ning R (2015) Cone beam breast CT with multiplanar and three dimensional visualization in differentiating breast masses compared with mammography. Eur J Radiol 84:48–53

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wienbeck S, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S, Lotz J, Uhlig J (2018) Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI. Eur Radiol 28:3731–3741

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uhlig J, Uhlig A, Biggemann L, Fischer U, Lotz J, Wienbeck S (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 29:1194–1202

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ma Y, Liu A, O’Connell AM et al (2021) Contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT features of breast cancers: correlation with immunohistochemical receptors and molecular subtypes. Eur Radiol 31:2580–2589

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Ma Y et al (2020) Cone-beam breast CT features associated with HER2/neu overexpression in patients with primary breast cancer. Eur Radiol 30:2731–2739

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li H, Yin L, He N et al (2019) Comparison of comfort between cone beam breast computed tomography and digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 120:108674

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wienbeck S, Lotz J, Fischer U (2017) Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe. Clin Imaging 42:50–59

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goto T, Camargo CA, Faridi MK, Freishtat RJ, Hasegawa K (2019) Machine learning-based prediction of clinical outcomes for children during emergency department triage. JAMA Netw Open 2:e186937

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med 162:55–63

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steyerberg EW, Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Grobbee DE, Moons KGM (2003) Internal and external validation of predictive models: a simulation study of bias and precision in small samples. J Clin Epidemiol 56:441–447

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steyerberg E (2009) Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating

American College of Radiology (ACR) Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media (2021) ACR manual on contrast media. Version 2021. Available via https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Clinical-Resources/Contrast_Media.pdf

European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Contrast Medium Safety Committee (2019) ESUR guidelines on contrast agents. version 10.0. Available via https://www.esur.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ESUR-Guidelines-10_0-Final-Version.pdf

Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative Imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vigneshwar NG, Moore EE, Moore HB et al (2022) Precision medicine: clinical tolerance to hyperfibrinolysis differs by shock and injury severity. Ann Surg 275:e605–e607

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yu Q, Ning Y, Wang A et al (2023) Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of benign and malignant parotid tumors based on contrast-enhanced CT: a multicenter study. Eur Radiol 33:6054–6065

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tagliafico AS, Piana M, Schenone D, Lai R, Massone AM, Houssami N (2020) Overview of radiomics in breast cancer diagnosis and prognostication. Breast 49:74–80

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Michaels AY, Chung CSW, Frost EP, Birdwell RL, Giess CS (2017) Interobserver variability in upgraded and non-upgraded BI-RADS 3 lesions. Clin Radiol 72:694.e691-694.e696

Article  Google Scholar 

Eghtedari M, Chong A, Rakow-Penner R, Ojeda-Fournier H (2021) Current status and future of BI-RADS in multimodality imaging, from the AJR special series on radiology reporting and data systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 216:860–873

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

European Society of R (2015) Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European society of radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 6:141–155

Article  Google Scholar 

O’Connor JPB, Aboagye EO, Adams JE et al (2017) Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:169–186

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Galati F, Moffa G, Pediconi F (2022) Breast imaging: beyond the detection. Eur J Radiol 146:110051

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hsu SM, Kuo WH, Kuo FC, Liao YY (2019) Breast tumor classification using different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14:623–633

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thakur SB, Horvat JV, Hancu I et al (2019) Quantitative in vivo proton MR spectroscopic assessment of lipid metabolism: value for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 50:239–249

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iima M, Kataoka M, Kanao S et al (2018) Intravoxel incoherent motion and quantitative non-Gaussian diffusion MR imaging: evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic value of several markers of malignant and benign breast lesions. Radiology 287:432–441

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Q, Spincemaille P, Drotman M et al (2022) Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesion: Comparison with traditional kinetics modeling and semi-quantitative enhancement curve characteristics. Magn Reson Imaging 86:86–93

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liney GP, Sreenivas M, Gibbs P, Garcia-Alvarez R, Turnbull LW (2006) Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: semiautomated vs. manual morphological description. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI 23:493–498

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Boone JM, Lindfors KK, Yang K (2012) Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study. Med Phys 39:866–873

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144:646–674

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohammed ZM, McMillan DC, Edwards J et al (2013) The relationship between lymphovascular invasion and angiogenesis, hormone receptors, cell proliferation and survival in patients with primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer. BMC Clin Pathol 13:31

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Heaphy CM, Griffith JK, Bisoffi M (2009) Mammary field cancerization: molecular evidence and clinical importance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118:229–239

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uematsu T (2015) Focal breast edema associated with malignancy on T2-weighted images of breast MRI: peritumoral edema, prepectoral edema, and subcutaneous edema. Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan) 22:66–70

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee KM, Kim EJ, Jahng GH, Park BJ (2014) Value of perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of supratentorial anaplastic astrocytoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 56:261–264

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schwertfeger KL, Cowman MK, Telmer PG, Turley EA, McCarthy JB (2015) Hyaluronan, inflammation, and breast cancer progression. Front Immunol 6:236

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheon H, Kim HJ, Kim TH et al (2018) Invasive breast cancer: prognostic value of peritumoral edema identified at preoperative MR imaging. Radiology 287:68–75

Article