Comparison of 5-ALA-PDT and LEEP of cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2) with high-risk human papillomavirus infection in childbearing age women: A non-randomized controlled polit study

ElsevierVolume 46, April 2024, 104044Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic TherapyAuthor links open overlay panel, , , , , , , , Highlights•

The therapeutic efficacy of PDT and LEEP is similar in the treatment of CIN Ⅱ patients.

There was no significant difference in the 12 months recurrence rate and reinfection rate of CIN Ⅱ patients after PDT and LEEP.

5-ALA-PDT, as a non-invasive treatment, may be an alternative choice for CIN2 patients.

AbstractBackground

5-Aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT) is a possible minimally-invasive treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL). The present study was carried out to assess the effect of 5-ALA-PDT and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2) combined with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection.

Methods

In this study, 190 patients with CIN2 and HR-HPV infection were finally included. They were divided into the LEEP Group (n = 116) and PDT Group (n = 74) according to gynecologist's recommendation and patient's willingness. All patients were followed up at 4–6 months and 12 months after treatment, including HPV testing, cytology, and colposcopy examination.

Results

(1) 4–6 months after treatment, the pathological regression rate was 97.30 % (72/74) in the PDT group and 98.28 % (114/116) in the LEEP group (P = 0.952). The HPV clearance rate was 81.08 % (60/74) in the PDT group and 80.17 % (93/116)in the LEEP group (P = 0.877). (2) 12 months after treatment, the pathological regression rate was 93.24 % (69/74) in the PDT group and 96.55 % (112/116) in the LEEP group (P = 0.486). The recurrence rate of CIN2 was 4.05 % (3/74) in the PDT group and 1.72 % (2/116) in the LEEP group (P = 0.608). The HPV clearance rate was 90.54 % (67/74) in the PDT group and 89.66 % (104/116)in the LEEP group (P = 0.843). The reinfection rate of HR-HPV was 5.41 % (4/74) in the PDT group and 1.72 % (2/116) in the LEEP group (P = 0.322). (3) The adverse reactions in the PDT Group were slightly lower than that in the LEEP Group (P = 0.4956), but the incidence of vaginal bleeding in the PDT group was lower than that in the LEEP group during follow-up.

Conclusions

The effectiveness of 5-ALA-PDT is similar to LEEP for CIN2 with less side effects. Therefore, 5-ALA-PDT, a non-invasive treatment, may be an effective method for CIN2 patients of childbearing age.

Keywords

LEEP

5-ALA-PDT

CIN2

HR-HPV infection

Photodynamic Therapy

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif