In spring, the on-duty medicolegal examiner at the Institute of Legal Medicine in Halle (Saale), Germany, was called to the discovery site of a corpse by criminal police officers. Over the phone, a police officer explained that children playing on an unused lot had found a female corpse. The children’s parents had subsequently notified the police. According to the police officer, the corpse was already mummified. Furthermore, the emergency doctor who had been called to the scene had already verified death. Although he had touched the corpse, he had not disturbed its position in view of a possible crime setting. The doctor had also already issued a medical certificate of death for an unknown person.

When the medicolegal examiner arrived, the discovery site had been widely cordoned off. Numerous media representatives had also already arrived at the scene. In consultation with the police, it was agreed that the external postmortem examination would wait until the forensic investigation of the site had been concluded. Consequently, the medicolegal examiner initially limited their involvement to the visual inspection of the deceased individual.

The corpse lay in supine position on a densely overgrown, unused lot. The body was, to a large extent, covered with mud, grass, and leaves so that only the face and parts of the torso and thighs were exposed (Fig. 1).

Overview of the discovery scene in Halle (Saale); Case report 1

The conspicuously flattened facial structure of the deceased immediately drew attention upon initial observation. Closer inspection revealed that the right side of the torso was resting on an approximately fist-sized stone that had pushed the thorax inwards. After cautiously palpitating this area to see if broken ribs could be felt, the medicolegal examiner discovered that the presumed corpse was, in fact, a female body composed of silicon-like material (Fig. 2).

Recovered doll composed of considerably weathered silicon-like material; Case report 1

The medicolegal examiner immediately informed the responsible criminal police officers that the presumptive corpse was only a doll that had obviously lain on the site for some time and was therefore highly weathered.

After the doll had been recovered, it could be seen that it lacked lower legs and that the arms were continuous with the torso. This was initially not apparent because the body had largely been overgrown with grass.

The attending emergency physician subsequently annulled the provided death certificate and accompanying billing documentation. To put their minds to rest, the children who had discovered the “corpse” were informed that what they had found was a doll.

During the winter season, a forced eviction from a private home within the jurisdiction of the Institute of Legal Medicine in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, was carried out.

Co-workers from a removal company, the property manager, and a bailiff had appeared for the clearance. When the tenant failed to open the door to his home, they called for the superintendent, who had a master key to the apartment. Upon entering the apartment, they found a human, or human-like, body in front of a ceiling-height radiator. This body was attached to the upper section of the radiator by a cord around its neck (Fig. 3).

The superintendent explained to the others that the body was a life-like doll that he had seen draped around the apartment in various positions on numerous previous occasions. The items in the home were subsequently photographed and inventoried. In the inventory list, the “life-like doll” was listed as a “dummy” and assigned the inventory number 267. The cleared inventory, including the dummy, was put into storage in a large container on the premises of the removal company.

Overview of the discovery scene for the case from the Frankfurt catchment area, police photograph file; Case report 2

Approximately one month later, the bailiff instructed the removal company to dispose of the cleared inventory from the forced eviction, with the exception of the dummy, which was suited for auction because of its life-like appearance. The “doll” was subsequently removed from the container, transferred to a pallet, covered with fleece, and stored in one of the removal company’s storage halls.

A month later, the removal company’s manager contacted one of the bailiff’s colleagues to ask for guidance on how to further proceed with the dummy in storage because it had obviously begun to decompose. The decision was made to contact the police.

Upon their arrival on the premises of the removal company, the police found the corpse of a man, in an advanced stage of putrefaction, on a pallet (Fig. 4).

Scene found by the police on their arrival, police photograph file; Case report 2

The investigative authorities ordered a forensic autopsy, toxicological testing with alcohol concentration analysis, and DNA profiling.

The autopsy of the male corpse revealed the following findings: Apart from the advanced internal and external putrefactive changes and an inventory sticker bearing the number 267 on the corpse’s left cheek, cardiac hypertrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and coronary artery disease were noted. There were no external or internal ligature marks. In as far as could be determined, there were no signs to suggest the man had been alive when he had ended up in the noose. The results of the toxicology tests and the alcohol analysis both did not indicate drug impairment or intoxication. Within the assessment constraints imposed by putrefaction, the only noteworthy histologic features to be found were pronounced myocardial fibrosis and, at best, early-stage liver cirrhosis. A comparative analysis of the DNA obtained from the deceased with that from a police databank allowed positive identification of the decedent as the tenant from the forced-eviction apartment.

During the ensuing police questioning of the people present at the original discovery site, the bailiff explained that the superintendent had been very convincing about the body being a life-like doll. In addition, the police records documented that the property manager also had stated that he had assumed that someone had wanted to play a “bad joke” on the persons tasked with the eviction, with the intention of giving them a fright. He had also added that the position of the body, had to him, appeared inconsistent with hanging because both of the body’s feet had stood firmly on the floor.

In the face of advanced putrefaction and the lack of findings consistent with hanging, the cause of death lastly remained undetermined. In view of these results and the inventory photographs that had captured the initial discovery scene in the apartment, there was no reason to exclude the possibility of death due to atypical hanging. Most notably, however, the investigation found no evidence of violence by another party.