The following letter presents a critique of the study titled “Ross procedure: valve function, clinical outcomes and predictors after 25 years’ follow-up,” recently published in your esteemed journal. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure, focusing on survival rates and incidence of valve dysfunction over a 25-year period. Despite revealing excellent overall survival rates and promising outcomes in pediatric patients, concerns regarding valvular failure and reintervention are underscored. While acknowledging limitations, such as sample size and observational biases, this study highlights the significance of surgeon experience in mitigating adverse outcomes. This critique emphasizes the study's contribution to understanding the efficacy and challenges of the Ross procedure, advocating further research to optimize patient outcomes.