Wendt C, Margolin S. Identifying breast cancer susceptibility genes—a review of the genetic background in familial breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(2):135–46.
Yadav P, et al. Clinical significance of TP53 (R72P) and MDM2 (T309G) polymorphisms in breast cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18(7):728–34.
MathSciNet CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xu Y, et al. Global trends and forecasts of breast cancer incidence and deaths. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):334.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.
Arnold M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;66:15–23.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu H, Xu B. Breast cancer: epidemiology, risk factors and screening. Chin J Cancer Res. 2023;35(6):565.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Iacoviello L, et al. Epidemiology of breast cancer, a paradigm of the “common soil” hypothesis. In: Seminars in Cancer biology. Elsevier; 2020.
Miedl H, et al. Association of the MDM2 SNP285 and SNP309 genetic variants with the risk, age at onset and prognosis of breast cancer in Central European women: a hospital-based case-control study. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(3):509.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sha M, Huang X, Yin Q. MiR-548b-3p inhibits proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells by targeting MDM2. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(6):3105–12.
Levav-Cohen Y, Haupt S, Haupt Y. Mdm2 in growth signaling and cancer: mini review. Growth Factors. 2005;23(3):183–92.
Agrawal A, et al. Regulation of the p14ARF-Mdm2-p53 pathway: an overview in breast cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2006;81(2):115–22.
MathSciNet CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Razi B, et al. Association between MTHFR gene polymorphism and susceptibility to autism spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2020;70:101473.
Fouchécourt S, et al. Apoptosis of Sertoli cells after conditional ablation of murine double minute 2 (Mdm2) gene is p53-dependent and results in male sterility. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(3):521–30.
Momand J, et al. The MDM2 gene amplification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26(15):3453–9.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ladanyi M, et al. MDM2 gene amplification in metastatic osteosarcoma. Can Res. 1993;53(1):16–8.
Li X, et al. Competitive ubiquitination activates the tumor suppressor p53. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:1807–18.
Liu B, et al. MDM2-mediated degradation of WRN promotes cellular senescence in a p53-independent manner. Oncogene. 2019;38(14):2501–15.
Eslami MM, et al. Factor V Leiden 1691G> a mutation and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb J. 2020;18(1):1–16.
Surekha D, et al. Codon 72 and G13964C intron 6 polymorphisms of TP53 in relation to development and progression of breast cancer in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(8):1893–988.
Mitra S, et al. Association of specific genotype and haplotype of p53 gene with cervical cancer in India. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(1):26–31.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jain N, et al. Infection of human papillomavirus type 18 and p53 codon 72 polymorphism in lung cancer patients from India. Chest. 2005;128(6):3999–4007.
Addala L, et al. P5 3 codon 72 gene polymorphism and risk of Oral squamous cell carcinoma in South Indian population: a case-control study. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2012;4:188–92.
Bond GL, et al. MDM2 SNP309 accelerates tumor formation in a gender-specific and hormone-dependent manner. Can Res. 2006;66(10):5104–10.
Bond GL, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and accelerates tumor formation in humans. Cell. 2004;119(5):591–602.
Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.
Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–48.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.
Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101.
Egger M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Akisik E, Yazici H, Dalay N. ARLTS1, MDM2 and RAD51 gene variations are associated with familial breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(1):343–8.
Paulin FE, et al. MDM2 SNP309 is associated with high grade node positive breast tumours and is in linkage disequilibrium with a novel MDM2 intron 1 polymorphism. BMC Cancer. 2008;8(1):281.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Copson ER, et al. Influence of the MDM2 single nucleotide polymorphism SNP309 on tumour development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. BMC Cancer. 2006;6(1):80.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Campbell IG, Eccles DM, Choong DY. No association of the MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism with risk of breast or ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2006;240(2):195–7.
Krekac D, et al. MDM2SNP309 does not associate with elevated MDM2 protein expression or breast cancer risk. Oncology. 2008;74(1–2):84–7.
Knappskog S, et al. The MDM2 promoter SNP285C/309G haplotype diminishes Sp1 transcription factor binding and reduces risk for breast and ovarian cancer in Caucasians. Cancer Cell. 2011;19(2):273–82.
Gansmo LB, et al. Influence of MDM2 SNP309 and SNP285 status on the risk of cancer in the breast, prostate, lung and colon. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(1):96–103.
Yilmaz M, et al. Significant association of the MDM2 T309G polymorphism with breast cancer risk in a Turkish population. Asian Pac j Cancer Prev APJCP. 2018;19(4):1059.
Petenkaya A, et al. Lack of association between the MDM2-SNP309 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(6C):4975–7.
Piotrowski P, et al. Murine double minute clone 2 309T/G and 285G/C promoter single nucleotide polymorphism as a risk factor for breast cancer: a Polish experience. Int J Biol Markers. 2012;27(2):105–10.
Sinilnikova OM, et al. The TP53 Arg72Pro and MDM2 309G> T polymorphisms are not associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(8):1456–60.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wasielewski M, et al. MDM2 SNP309 accelerates familial breast carcinogenesis independently of estrogen signaling. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;104(2):153–7.
Wilkening S, et al. The single nucleotide polymorphism IVS1+ 309 in mouse double minute 2 does not affect risk of familial breast cancer. Can Res. 2006;66(2):646–8.
Yarden RI, et al. MDM2 SNP309 accelerates breast and ovarian carcinogenesis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers of Jewish-Ashkenazi descent. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111(3):497–504.
Alshatwi AA, et al. A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the TP53 and MDM-2 gene modifies breast cancer risk in an ethnic Arab population. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2012;26(3):438–43.
Afshari ZT, et al. Lack of an association between a functional polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter and breast cancer in women in northeast Iran. Rep Biochem mol biol. 2017;6(1):112.
Sun Y-F, et al. Results based on 124 cases of breast cancer and 97 controls from Taiwan suggest that the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP309) in the MDM2 gene promoter is associated with earlier onset and increased risk of breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9(1):13.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Isakova J, et al. The association of polymorphic markers Arg399Gln of XRCC1 gene, Arg72Pro of TP53 gene and T309G of MDM2 gene with breast cancer in Kyrgyz females. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):758.
留言 (0)