Abstract

The pleural space is a “potential” anatomical space which is formed of two layers: visceral and parietal. It normally contains a trace of fluid (∼10 mL in each hemithorax). Diseases of the pleura can manifest with thickening of the pleural membranes or by abnormal accumulation of air or liquid. Chest radiographs are often the first imaging tests to point to a pleural pathology. With the exception of pneumothorax, and due to the inherent limitations of chest radiographs, ultrasound and/or computed tomography are usually required to further characterise the pleural pathology and guide management. This review summarises the utility of different imaging tools in the management of pleural disease and discusses new and evolving tools in imaging of the pleura.

Shareable abstract

Chest radiographs are often the first imaging tests to point to a pleural pathology. With the exception of pneumothorax, ultrasound and/or CT scans are usually required to further characterise the pleural pathology and guide management. https://bit.ly/3RdAcQy

General considerations

The pleural space is a “potential” anatomical space which is formed of two layers: visceral and parietal. It normally contains a trace of fluid (∼10 mL in each hemithorax) [1]. The two pleural layers together have minute thickness and, in absence of pathology, are seen on computed tomography (CT) as a 1–2 mm “intercostal stripe” which comprises the pleural membranes as well as extra-pleural adipose tissue [2]. Diseases of the pleura can manifest with thickening of the pleural membranes or by abnormal accumulation of air or liquid.

Imaging of pleural abnormalities

Chest radiographs are often the first imaging tests to point to a pleural pathology. With the exception of pneumothorax, and due to the inherent limitations of chest radiographs, ultrasound (US) and/or CT scanning are usually required to further characterise the pleural pathology and guide management.

Pleural thickening occurs due to various inflammatory and infectious causes and is also a feature of pleural malignancy. A chest radiograph may demonstrate pleural thickening as a peripheral radio-opaque stripe or as an “apical” cap, but more subtle thickening is only visible on CT scans. A late (venous)-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan is the optimal imaging protocol to visualise pleural thickening [2]. On chest radiographs, basal thickening causes obliteration of the costophrenic angle (figure 1), simulating a small pleural effusion. These two abnormalities can be differentiated using CT or US. A distinct type of pleural thickening are “pleural plaques”, which are localised areas of thickening with shelf-like edges that exhibit a geographical appearance on chest radiographs and commonly show calcification (figure 1) [3]. These distinct abnormalities are benign and are seen in people who have been exposed to asbestos [3].

FIGURE 1

Chest radiographs (posterior–anterior projection) showing pleural thickening, plaques and effusion. a) Bilateral upper zone and diaphragmatic pleural plaques (arrows) and right basal pleural thickening (arrowhead). b) Large free-flowing pleural effusion in the left side. c) Rounded haziness (arrows) caused by left encysted pleural effusion.

As little as 175 mL of pleural fluid can blunt the costophrenic angle on a posteroanterior chest radiograph, but a smaller effusion can be detected on a lateral view [4]. It has been shown that chest radiographs miss more than 10% of a size-significant effusion that warrants thoracentesis especially in cases of lower lobe consolidation [5]. Free-flowing pleural effusions exhibit an upper-border, or “meniscus”, on chest radiography whereby the homogeneous opacity has an upward concavity (figure 1). Encysted pleural effusions will have more abrupt edges (see the section on pleural infection) and may appear as haziness rather than dense opacification (figure 1).

Both CT and US have superior sensitivity in detecting pleural effusion in comparison to chest radiography and are able to reveal only few millilitres of fluid [6]. While US is more sensitive in demonstrating pleural fluid septations, mediastinal pockets of pleural fluid can only be visualised on CT [6].

This review summarises the utility of different imaging tools in the management of pleural disease including infection, malignancy and pneumothorax. Non-expandable lung and diaphragm disorders are also discussed. The review concludes with some data on new and evolving tools in imaging of the pleura.

Malignant pleural effusion

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common condition that develops in 15% of patients with metastatic cancer [7]. It is more commonly associated with secondary cancers (i.e. non-mesotheliomas), with lung cancer and breast cancer the most common primaries causing MPE in men and women, respectively [8]. In countries with a historical burden of asbestos use, such as the UK and Australia [8, 9], mesothelioma appears to be a common cause for MPE.

Malignant involvement of the pleura manifests with thickening and/or effusion. On CT scanning, smooth pleural thickening is usually a feature of benign disease, although thickening >1 cm is more suggestive of malignancy (figure 2) [10]. Nodularity of the pleura is virtually diagnostic of malignancy (figure 2). Leung et al. [10] found that circumferential thickening of the pleura, pleural nodularity, >1 cm thickness of parietal pleura, and involvement of mediastinal pleura had specificities of 100%, 94%, 94%, and 88%, respectively, for pleural malignancy. While being highly specific, these abnormalities are not universally present in malignant pleural disease. In a study including 211 patients with biopsy confirmed MPE, pre-thoracoscopy CT scanning had a sensitivity of only 68% [11]. It is also notable that none of the malignant features cited above can reliably differentiate primary from secondary pleural malignancy.

FIGURE 2

a–c) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) sections in mediastinal window showing different forms of parietal pleural thickening. a) Smooth enhancing pleural thickening >1 cm (yellow arrow) in a case of mesothelioma. Note the calcified pleural plaques (white arrow). b) Smooth pleural thickening in a case of empyema. c) Nodular pleural thickening in a case of metastatic lung cancer. d) Positron emission tomography-CT of a patient with left side empyema. Note radioactive tracer uptake of the thickened pleura.

Thoracic US can be used to identify MPE in patients presenting with a new pleural effusion. In a study carried out in the radiology department, the presence of parietal or diaphragmatic pleural nodularity, pleural thickening >1 cm, or liver deposits on thoracic US were used to diagnose MPE [12]. Thoracic US had a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 100% [12]. While such a diagnostic accuracy is impressive, it is important to remember that US is operator-dependent, and thus the experience of the operator will be a strong determinant in the correct elicitation and interpretation of US findings.

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is not routinely requested in the diagnosis of MPE. However, PET scans may be helpful in MPE for identifying the primary malignancy in cases where other imaging modalities have not been helpful [13]. As with other cancers, pleural avidity on PET-CT is not pathognomonic of malignancy and can be seen in pleural infection (figure 2). In addition, pleural avidity on PET-scanning is seen after pleurodesis (due to pleural inflammation) and such avidity can persist for years. This is relevant where PET-CT is requested to rule out recurrence of pleural malignancy in patients who have previously been treated with pleurodesis [14].

Mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon asbestos-driven malignancy with a median survival of ∼18 months. 85% of patients present with a symptomatic pleural effusion, placing pleural imaging at the centre of the diagnostic pathway. Radiological quantification is also critical for staging and assessment of response to therapy, including combination immunotherapy, which significantly extends survival in some patients [15].

Imaging modalities

A chest radiograph is usually the first imaging test performed in suspected MPM. A unilateral, and often large, effusion may be the only visible abnormality, and emergence of a new effusion on a background of established pleural plaques is highly suspicious. Nodular pleural thickening, unilateral volume loss and fissural pleural thickening are all classically associated with MPM [16]; however, these are late radiographic features. Pleural plaques are consistent with asbestos exposure, but are commonly observed in patients who will never develop MPM [3].

CT remains the workhorse of the MPM pathway. In addition to effusion, CT will often reveal nodular, enhancing pleural thickening. Mediastinal, circumferential and fissural pleural thickening are typical of MPM [16, 17], but no CT parameter reliably differentiates MPM from secondary pleural cancers. CT is significantly limited by poor tissue contrast between MPM and adjacent soft tissues/loculated fluid, translating into poor sensitivity (58–68%) in large series [11, 18]. This mandates a low threshold for invasive sampling if clinical suspicion is high. CT sensitivity is particularly low (27%) using CT pulmonary angiography and venous phase acquisition (69–90 s) is essential [18]. Peak contrast enhancement in a MPM tumour does not occur until 4.5 min on CT [19] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [20], prompting delayed acquisition in some centres.

US is a key imaging modality in MPM, since most patients present with pleural effusion. US is cheap, highly portable and is associated with a reduced rate of visceral injury and improved sample yield during pleural fluid aspiration [21, 22]. US can also direct image-guided pleural biopsy. Sonographic features of MPM, including nodular pleural thickening >1 cm and diaphragmatic nodules, are highly specific (95–100%) but lack sensitivity (40%) [23], mandating further investigation if MPM is suspected clinically (similar to CT).

MRI does not yet have a routine role in the diagnostic MPM pathway but has distinct advantages over CT in early detection (figure 3). In early stage MPM, macroscopic pleural thickening may be absent, placing a premium on functional imaging tuned to other events, including neovascularisation. In a recent study of 58 patients, of whom 84% had a median pleural thickness <10 mm, perfusion MRI was associated with 92% sensitivity, compared with 56% sensitivity using CT [20]. Clinical deployment of MRI is currently limited by scanner availability and the increased scanning and reporting time required.

FIGURE 3

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (b, d, f and h) and corresponding contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images (a, c, e and g) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Panels a, b) and g, h) demonstrate low volume disease with minimal pleural thickening, while c, d) and e, f) demonstrate pleural-based mass lesions. In both settings, MRI offers superior soft tissue contrast over CT. Images courtesy of the authors of [20].

Disease staging, quantification and response assessment

MPM staging is primarily based on contrast-enhanced CT, with PET-CT and MRI reserved for specific questions in patients being considered for radical surgery. MRI has higher sensitivity than CT for chest wall and diaphragmatic invasion [24], which would both preclude radical resection. PET-CT has enhanced sensitivity to nodal and distant metastases [25], with 29% of patients having CT-occult extra-pleural disease in one previous study [26]. The recent negative results of the MARS2 trial of extended pleurectomy/decortication may reduce enthusiasm for such approaches in the future [27].

The complex morphology of MPM violates mathematical assumptions regarding spherical growth that underpin relationships between unidimensional tumour measurements and volume required for response assessment. Therefore, radiologists currently rely on a modified version of the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) criteria for a best estimate of tumour response. However, these methods (currently version 1.1) are associated with high interobserver disagreement and up to 30% variance in total tumour measurements [28]. Direct measurement of MPM is the obvious alternative and although human measurements are prognostically valuable [29, 30] they are extremely laborious and inconsistent when applied by human readers [31]. This has prompted training and successful validation of a fully automated deep-learning artificial intelligence algorithm for CT volumetry [32], which should make MPM volume a more practical metric for future response assessment.

Pleural infection

The global burden and the incidence of pleural infection has been shown to have increased steadily over the past decade [33]. There is a significant overlap between the imaging features of infectious and non-infectious pleural diseases and in many cases diagnostic thoracentesis is required to ascertain the diagnosis. In this section we highlight the characteristic features of different imaging modalities focusing on bacterial and mycobacterial infection only.

Non-tuberculosis bacterial pleural infection

Infected pleural effusion can evolve into three stages which represent a continuous spectrum; however, each stage has its unique radiological and biochemical features [34]. These stages are: uncomplicated simple exudate (stage I), complicated fibrinopurulent (stage II) and organised empyema (stage III). Chest radiography and thoracic US are considered essential imaging modalities for diagnosis and drainage guidance of pleural infection [23].

Uncomplicated infected effusion on a chest radiograph is usually a unilateral, small, free-flowing effusion with an associated area of consolidation [23]. Primary pleural infection may occur in the absence of parenchymal lung infection, as a result of haematogenous spread or translocation of bacteria from an adjacent organ such as intra-abdominal infection [35]. When pleural infection progresses to fibrinopurulent and organised stages, it appears as a loculated pleural collection (figure 4a). Another feature which indicates a complicated pleural effusion is the presence of gas in the pleural space. Unless it resulted from an iatrogenic introduction of air into the pleural cavity during thoracentesis, it is termed pyopneumothorax and the gas source is a bronchopleural fistula or a gas-forming bacteria (figure 4) [7].

FIGURE 4

Imaging features of pleural infection on different modalities. a) Chest radiograph shows a laterally loculated pleural effusion on the right side (note the near-vertical free border of effusion). b, c) Thoracic ultrasound stills show septated pleural fluid and echogenic densities suggestive of pus. d, e) Computed tomography sections showing posteriorly loculated pyopneumothorax.

In stages II and III the infected effusion usually appears as turbid, loculated, septated or homogeneously echogenic fluid on US (figure 4b, c). The presence of small hyperechoic dots represents gas bubbles and may indicate pyopneumothorax. However, the presence of anechoic effusion cannot differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated pleural effusion [36].

Chest CT scan is a frequently used modality to evaluate pleural infection. However, and similar to other imaging modalities, there are no pathognomonic features to differentiate infectious from non-infectious pleural disease [23]. On CT, oblong configuration, split pleural sign, hypertrophy and increased density of the extra-pleural fat, as well as the presence of ipsilateral consolidation, increase the likelihood of infectious aetiology [37]. It is sometimes difficult to differentiate lung abscess from empyema, but such delineation is important as it has a therapeutic implication (figure 4) [38]. Chest CT scan may also show moderately enlarged (<2 cm) mediastinal lymphadenopathy which is commonly associated with parapneumonic effusion. Larger mediastinal lymphadenopathy should rise suspicion of an alternative pathological process [39].

PET scans and MRI can image the pleura; however, they have a limited role in the management of parapneumonic effusions. On MRI imaging, parapneumonic effusions have a low signal on T1-weighted and high signal on T2-weighted. It is superior to CT in detecting pleural fluid septation and extra-pleural fat changes [40]. This imaging modality may be used in MPE to evaluate soft tissue invasion such as chest wall, diaphragmatic and spinal invasion [23].

Mycobacterial pleural infection

Tuberculous pleural effusions may result from primary infection or secondary (reactivation) disease [41]. Host immune status significantly increases the incidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis including pleural tuberculosis (PTB), which is estimated to affect 6% in non-AIDS patients compared with 11% of AIDS patients [42].

On a chest radiograph, immune competent hosts commonly have unilateral, small to moderate effusion [41]. It is reported to be more common on the right side and is associated with parenchymal infiltrate in half of the cases [43]. By contrast, HIV-positive patients, regardless of CD4 count, are more likely to have bilateral pleural effusion and parenchymal infiltration than HIV-negative patients with odds ratios of 3.81 and 4.38, respectively [44].

Thoracic US allows characterisation of tuberculous fluid, which ranges from anechoic to septated, echogenic fluid [45]. The appearance of a complex, septated pleural fluid, which is found to be lymphocytic and exudative on analysis, has a positive predictive value of 94% for PTB [46]. However, none of the pleural sonographic features is pathognomonic for PTB. A concomitant pericardiac effusion may be detected in up to 6% of PTB cases [47]. In a multicentre Italian study, the presence of an enlarged (short axis >5 mm) internal mammary lymph node increased the likelihood of PTB, especially in patients <50 years of age with a positive predictive value of 87.8% [48]. In another pilot study, tuberculous pleurisy was found to be associated with apical consolidations (odds ratio 9.67) and subpleural nodules (odds ratio 5.30) [49]. Late sequelae of tuberculous pleurisy include localised pleural thickening and/or calcifications [50].

Thoracic US can be used as an image-guiding modality to biopsy thickened pleura [45]. Dissection of pus through the parietal pleura to the soft tissues of the chest wall is termed empyema necessitans and is a rare condition commonly caused by tuberculous mycobacterial infection and can be easily visualised on US (figure 5) [51].

FIGURE 5

Tuberculous empyema complicated with empyema necessitans. a) Ultrasound and b) contrast-enhanced computed tomography show large intra-muscular collection (*); arrows indicate the tuberculous empyema.

Chest CT has the advantage of better visualising the lung parenchyma, thoracic lymph nodes and soft tissue. Involvement of these structures may have specific radiological features which are beyond the scope of this review. Focal smooth pleural thickening is reported to be the most common CT finding in PTB, it was reported to affect more than half of cases [52]. However, the circumferential, nodular thickness that exceeds 1 cm and involves mediastinal pleura which is highly suggestive of pleural malignancy has been reported to be seen in PTB as well [52]. Fibrothorax is a rare complication of PTB which is characterised by uniformly thickened pleura, with adhesion of the parietal and visceral pleura and loss of volume of the affected hemithorax [53]. Chest CT can add valuable clinical information by detecting other complications of PTB such as bronchopleural fistula or empyema necessitans [53]. Another rare complication of long-standing tuberculous empyema is pseudo-chylothorax, where a pathognomonic CT feature of fat-fluid or fat-calcium level is described in literature [54].

Pneumothorax

Pneumothorax appears when air enters the pleural cavity through either injury of visceral pleura and/or injury of the chest wall. It can be spontaneous (without an external factor) or traumatic/iatrogenic, affecting either normal (primary spontaneous pneumothorax) or diseased lung (secondary pneumothorax). Air accumulating in the pleural cavity causes an increase in pleural pressure and partial or total ipsilateral lung collapse.

Chest radiography is the most frequently used imaging modality for diagnosis and management of spontaneous pneumothorax, while traumatic or iatrogenic pneumothorax is more frequently detected by chest US or CT first. The sensitivity of a chest radiograph is ∼46% (95% CI 36–56.0), and depends on the patient's position; it can be as low as 20% in the supine position [55, 56]. Chest radiography has a specificity of 100% (95% CI 99–100%) [57].

In the upright position, air starts to collect in the apical region (the least gravitationally dependent part), more laterally than medially, pushing the lung away from the chest wall, which is visible as an opaque line of visceral pleura with aerated lung on the hilar side and more lucent (darker) pleural space filled with air on the chest wall side (figure 6). There is no need to perform expiratory radiographs as they do not show higher sensitivity in the diagnosis of pneumothorax [58, 59].

FIGURE 6

Different methods of measuring pneumothorax size on chest radiographs. a) Size is assessed based on the distance between the visceral pleura and chest wall on the level of the hilum; if ≥2 cm big pneumothorax is diagnosed. b) Size is measured in the apex; if ≥3 cm big pneumothorax is diagnosed. c) Light index assesses pneumothorax volume V(%)=(1−L3/H3)×100, where L is the diameter of collapsed lung and H is the diameter of the hemithorax on a chest radiograph. d) Collins formula: V=4.2+(4.7×(A+B+C)), uses three interpleural distances measured at specified points (A, B and C) to assess the volume of pneumothorax.

Depending on the size of pneumothorax, the lung may be completely compressed, and in cases of tension pneumothorax the mediastinum may be shifted to the contralateral side. Sometimes air may accumulate in other areas of the chest cavity as presented in figure 7. A sign that indirectly suggests the presence of air in the pleural cavity is a straight fluid horizontal line (figure 7), appearing when there is fluid and air in pleural space (hydropneumothorax).

FIGURE 7

a) Upright, posterior–anterior (PA) radiograph with pneumothorax on the left side. White arrows show visceral pleura, which is a thin, sharply defined opaque (white) line with aerated lung (with visible vessels and lung tissue) on the hilar side. b) Chest radiograph PA view showing pneumothorax ex vacuo after pleural effusion evacuation in a patient with long-standing rheumatoid pleuritis. c) Lateral radiograph of the same patient shown in panel b. White arrows show visceral pleura of collapsed lung lobe, grey arrows show pleural effusion forming a horizontal line. d) Radiograph and e) computed tomography of the same patient with loculated pneumothorax. Thin white arrows show air in the pleural cavity. Grey arrows show deep sulcus sign.

In the case of a supine patient, air is most visible at the lung bases, increasing the lucency over the upper abdomen. Therefore, pneumothorax should be suspected when there is a sharp demarcation of the cardiac and mediastinal interfaces in anteromedial recess or there is a deep sulcus sign, double diaphragm sign or when subcutaneous gas is present in nonpenetrating trauma patients (figure 7) [60, 61]. Chest radiography in lateral decubitus position may show a small pneumothorax (15 mL of air) [62]. One should not forget about situations that may mimic pneumothorax (for details see table 1). Different formulas allow quantification of pneumothorax size and the making of therapeutic decisions (figure 6) [58, 63, 64].

TABLE 1

Conditions mimicking pneumothorax on imaging and limitations of imaging tests in diagnosis of pneumothorax

A chest radiograph (with a lateral view) performed 1–4 h after drain insertion allows documentation of the resolution of pneumothorax, drain position, or possible complications.

US has become more popular in diagnostics of lung diseases, including pneumothorax. US detects pneumothorax with a sensitivity of 82.9% (95% CI 78.3–86.9%) and a specificity of 98.2% (95% CI 97.0–99.0%) and is better in neonates and trauma settings [55, 57]. The patient is examined in the supine position, as air moves to the front part of the chest in this position. The US probe (a linear one) is put parallel to the intercostal spaces between the II–IV rib (the least gravitationally dependent areas) close to the sternum and then moved laterally. Features of pneumothorax include abolished lung sliding, absence of lung pulse or comet-tail artefacts, and the presence of a lung point. In M-mode, it is typical to observe the stratosphere/barcode sign (supplementary videos). Unfortunately, US does not allow exact assessment of pneumothorax size, is operator-dependent and is not devoid of some limitations (see table 1). However, it should be noted that some studies document diagnosis of big pneumothorax on lung US when the lung point is visible in the mid-axillary line or below [65]. US shows high utility in detection of pneumothorax in supine patients, trauma patients, after lung biopsy or in the assessment prior to intercostal tube removal. CT is still a gold standard imaging modality in detecting pneumothorax. The volumetric, thin-slice (1.5 mm) technique is optimal for detection of pneumothorax and also underlying causes (such as blebs, infection or rib fracture). CT scans are performed when radiographs are difficult to interpret, differential diagnosis is needed, to detect underlying causes (e.g. interstitial lung disease), to rule out complications (e.g. extra-pleural drain position) or to drain a loculated pneumothorax. In case of doubtful situations, CT scans should be performed especially in patients with underlying lung diseases.

The diaphragm

As the primary muscle responsible for breathing, the diaphragm plays a crucial role in the respiratory process. This dome-shaped muscle separates the chest cavity from the abdominal cavity and during contraction it flattens and moves caudally, thus increasing the volume of the chest cavity, allowing the flow of air. Conversely, as the diaphragm muscle relaxes it returns to its dome shape due to the elasticity of the lungs.

Several diseases and conditions can affect diaphragm function, leading to impaired breathing. These include central and peripheral neurological disorders, neuromuscular, mediastinal lesions or trauma, and pulmonary diseases such as COPD, lung fibrosis or pleural effusion. Diaphragmatic dysfunction, paresis or paralysis leads to breathing difficulties ranging from mild dyspnoea during exercise to respiratory failure [66].

Imaging of diaphragm function

The most used imaging modalities to evaluate diaphragm function are fluoroscopy and US. While fluoroscopy has traditionally been used, it holds significant disadvantages compared with US, such as exposure to radiation and the lack of mobility and portability that allows US to be performed at the point of care in the emergency department, in the respiratory ward or in the intensive care unit. US can measure the excursion of the diaphragm during breathing, as well as the thickness of the muscle in contraction and relaxation.

Ultrasound modalities

Different US modalities can aid evaluation of diaphragm function. In normal B-mode, excursion of the diaphragm can be easily visualised and gross dysfunction in either of the hemidiaphragms appears. However, it may be useful to quantify contraction and for this the most used US modality is the M-mode. Total excursion is easily measured on the right side using the liver as an acoustic window toward the dorsal part of the diaphragm in the midclavicular line. Contraction appears as a wave shape and total excursion measured as the difference between top (contraction/inspiration) and bottom (relaxation, expiration). Furthermore, contraction and release velocity can be measured giving information on muscle strength and lung recoil conditions. In lateral positions the thickness of the diaphragm muscle gives information about contractional strength and breathing efforts as the fraction, difference or ratio between thickness in inspiration versus expiration [67].

Clinical utility

Non-imaging evaluation of the diaphragm includes invasive neuromuscular or oesophageal pressure measurements and are thus limited to selected patients. In intensive care medicine, US plays a role during weaning patients from mechanical ventilation setting the optimal time point for extubation. In respiratory medicine, diaphragm evaluation has been shown to relate to symptom relief following thoracentesis [68, 69]. In COPD, hyperinflation may lead to displacement of the diaphragm and muscular dysfunction may additionally reduce contractility [70]. While diaphragm dysfunction may play a role during acute exacerbation of COPD, additional studies are needed to define its place in clinical recommendations and practice, especially in relation to respiratory failure requiring noninvasive ventilation [71]. Likewise, its role in the field of interstitial lung diseases is yet to be established, but studies suggest high prevalence of diaphragm dysfunction in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease.

Future directions

A pervasive problem with diaphragm evaluation is the lack of standardised methodology. Agreement on US scanning protocols needs to be set. Normal values, correlation to non-US methods and cut-off levels to rule in or out the presence of diaphragm dysfunction must be elaborated and established. Also, clinical studies on its ability to detect, monitor, predict and influence clinical decision making are needed before US evaluation is ready for the respiratory clinic.

Imaging in prediction of pleural outcomes

Imaging predictors of the outcomes of pleural intervention have been the focus of study in different disease areas and carry promise for providing noninvasive clues to direct further management particularly in MPE [6].

Non-expandable lung

The term “non-expandable lung” (NEL) encompasses a range of conditions characterised by the incapacity of the lung to undergo the expansion necessary for physiological pleural interactions. Three principal aetiologies of NEL have been identified: 1) endobronchial obstruction leading to lobar collapse or chronic lung atelectasis; 2) reduced pulmonary compliance attributable to extensive pulmonary scarring and fibrosis; and 3) constriction of the visceral pleura as a sequela to pleural pathology [72–74]. Depending on the underlying cause of visceral pleural restriction, two distinct categories of NEL have been documented: trapped lung and lung entrapment.

In patients afflicted with trapped lung, the extraction of fluid from the pleural space is concomitant with a precipitous decline in pleural pressure (Ppl), typically manifesting as an initially negative Ppl reading. Conversely, lung entrapment permits a partial re-expansion of the lung during the initial stages of pleural fluid drainage and is commonly identified by a positive baseline Ppl. However, when the initial pleural pressure–volume curve maintains a normal or near-normal pattern while fluid removal continues, it signifies the lung's limitation in re-expanding beyond a specific volume threshold. This phenomenon is visually represented by the steeper descent observed in the second segment of the pressure–volume curve.

Diagnosis of NEL

The identification of an NEL holds significant relevance in the decision-making process for managing patients afflicted by MPE. Depending on factors such as the patient's clinical condition, anticipated lifespan, personal preferences and the lung's capacity for re-expansion, clinicians can propose one of three therapeutic strategies: 1) serial thoracenteses, 2) pleurodesis, or 3) the insertion of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). Both pleurodesis and the IPC placement are regarded as “definitive” interventions [75], leading to enhanced health-related quality of life [76] and a decreased likelihood of future pleural procedures. It is imperative to assess lung expandability when contemplating pleurodesis as a treatment option, as effective pleural adhesion necessitates adequate pleural apposition.

While pleural manometry serves as an elegant technique for estimating pleural elastance and gauging the mechanical attributes of the lung, the assessment of lung expandability can also be gleaned from radiological indicators, such as visceral pleura thickening, basal pneumothorax, septated pleural effusion [77], ipsilateral volume loss, lobar atelectasis [78], pneumothorax ex vacuo, or inability to attain complete lung re-expansion following the removal of pleural fluid.

In a study by Chopra et al. [79], researchers examined the relationship between pleural elastance and post-thoracentesis radiographic findings in 70 patients with MPE. Elevated pleural elastance was seen in 51.4%, with 54% showing incomplete lung re-expansion. Only 71% showed agreement between pleural elastance and radiography; 29% had conflicting results. Normal pleural elastance correlated with 68% achieving complete lung re-expansion versus 25% with elevated pleural elastance. This study warns against solely relying on pleural elastance for lung expandability predictions and suggests its potential role in patient selection for pleurodesis, urging further investigation into pleurodesis outcomes.

Furthermore, some studies propose that the integration of manometry with other methods, such as lung US, can enhance its diagnostic and therapeutic utility. Salamonsen et al. [80] demonstrated that the incorporation of US could heighten the sensitivity in diagnosing an NEL by measuring various parameters, including the displacement of the collapsed lung during a breath hold using M-mode US.

In a study conducted on a group of 365 patients diagnosed with MPE, Trovisco et al. [81] demonstrate a correlation between the frequency of NEL and lung cancer as the cause of pleural fluid (70.6% of patients with NEL). Furthermore, the occurrence of NEL was higher in patients with identified loculated fluid in the pleural cavity (67% of patients with NEL).

Hassan et al. [82] demonstrated the capability of US to assess the displacement of the collapsed lung and its echogenicity to determine its potential for re-expansion. The comparison of lung echogenicity made against the echogenicity of the liver quantified with the assistance of software revealed the area under the curve of lung/liver echogenicity to predict NEL was 0.77 (95% CI 0.55–1; p=0.03). A cut-off of >1.6 had 71% sensitivity and 83% specificity.

Diaphragm dynamics and pleural fluid drainage

Recent studies have focused on analysing the role of the diaphragm and its function in the context of management of patients with symptomatic pleural effusion. The PLEASE-1 study, by Muruganandan et al. [68], focused on thoracentesis in patients with symptomatic pleural effusion. Besides demonstrating a notable improvement in breathlessness after thoracentesis, the study also presented compelling observations concerning the diaphragm. Pre-drainage, 50% had altered diaphragm dynamics on US, which mostly normalised afterwards. Regardless of the initial condition, most experienced improved breathlessness and diaphragm movement. A significant link (p<0.001) was found between movement and effusion appearance. After drainage, those with normalised diaphragm shape often regained normal movement. Post-drainage, 73% of all participants showed improved breathlessness; notably, 84% of NEL patients exhibited meaningful improvement.

Based on the findings regarding diaphragm function in the PLEASE-1 study, the researchers initiated an investigation to examine the impact of pleural effusion on the function of both hemidiaphragms. Data from the pilot PLEASE-2 study suggest that unilateral pleural effusions affect the function of both hemidiaphragms [83]. Moreover, it has been noted that the abnormal function of the ipsilateral and contralateral of both hemidiaphragms resolved post-drainage.

Ultrasound and pleurodesis outcome

Pleurodesis is a medical or surgical procedure that involves applying one or more of various injurious agents between the visceral and parietal and pleural membranes with the aim of inducing pleural symphysis and preventing re-accumulation of fluid (air or liquid) in the space [14]. Pleural symphysis will invariably cause cessation of pleural sliding, a sign that can be seen on pleural US [6]. The cessation of pleural sliding on US following pleurodesis was first demonstrated in a surgical cohort of patients who underwent mechanical pleurodesis (via pleural abrasions) for pneumothorax [84]. In an animal model of pleurodesis, the lack of sliding on US strongly correlated with the presence of macroscopic and microscopic pleural adhesions [85]. In a case series of patients with MPE undergoing talc slurry pleurodesis, the adherence score (a composite of scores in different zones of the hemithorax based on whether sliding was present) measured 24 h after talc administration correlated with the risk of pleurodesis failure [86]. In a multicentre trial of patients with MPE undergoing pleurodesis, using the adherence score as opposed to the standard of care (chest radiograph findings plus pleural fluid output) led to shorter hospital stays and was found to be highly cost-effective [87]. In a small case series, the presence of echogenic swirling patterns in patients with MPE was associated with higher risk of subsequent talc pleurodesis failure [88].

Endoscopy

In essence, thoracoscopy is the ultimate imaging test for the pleura. It provides access to the pleural space allowing direct visualisation of the visceral and parietal pleurae. According to the approach, the procedure can be carried out in spontaneously breathing patients (medical thoracoscopy) or under general anaesthesia (thoracoscopic surgery) and can be achieved via one, two or three ports according to the complexity of the intervention intended [89].

In cases where pleural effusion is present, complete evacuation of the space is attempted first to optimise examination. It is normally feasible to examine the full costal pleura and diaphragmatic pleura as well as the visceral pleura overlying the lung surfaces. It is also technically feasible to examine the pericardium [90].

Normally, the parietal pleura appears pink, shiny and smooth and the neurovascular bundle as well as subpleural adipose tis