Blomström-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, Burri H, Nielsen JC, Bongiorni MG, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Europace. 2020;22(4):515–49.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scott M, Baykaner T, Bunch TJ, Piccini JP, Russo AM, Tzou WS, et al. Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic. Heart rhythm O2. 2023;4(3):193–9.

Saha N, Millward JM, Herrmann CJJ, Rahimi F, Han H, Lacour P, et al. High-fidelity 3D stray magnetic field mapping of smartphones to address safety considerations with active implantable electronic medical devices. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;23(3).

Nadeem F, Tran CT, Torbey E, Philbin D, Morales C, Wu M. Interference by modern smartphones and accessories with cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022;24(4):347–53.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Urbinello D, Joseph W, Verloock L, Martens L, Roosli M. Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities. Environ Res. 2014;134:134–42.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gajsek P, Ravazzani P, Wiart J, Grellier J, Samaras T, Thuroczy G. Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz-6 GHz). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015;25(1):37–44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hours M, Khati I, Hamelin J. Interference between active implanted medical devices and electromagnetic field emitting devices is rare but real: results of an incidence study in a population of physicians in France. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(3):290–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Turagam MK, Deering T, Chung M, Cheng J, Fisher J, Lakkireddy D, American College of Cardiology's Electrophysiology Leadership S. Electromagnetic interference and cardiac implantable electronic devices: is the ride in electric cars still cool? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(2):210–3.

Greenberg JC, Altawil MR, Singh G. Letter to the Editor-Lifesaving therapy inhibition by phones containing magnets. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(6):1040–1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lacour P, Dang PL, Heinzel FR, Parwani AS, Bähr F, Kucher A, et al. Magnetic field-induced interactions between phones containing magnets and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: flip it to be safe? Heart Rhythm. 2022;19(3):372–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Napp A, Stunder D, Maytin M, Kraus T, Marx N, Driessen S. Are patients with cardiac implants protected against electromagnetic interference in daily life and occupational environment? Eur Heart J. 2015;36(28):1798–804.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lennerz C, Horlbeck L, Weigand S, Grebmer C, Blazek P, Brkic A, et al. Patients with pacemakers or defibrillators do not need to worry about e-Cars: An observational study. Technol Health Care. 2020;28(1):1–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lennerz C, O’Connor M, Horlbeck L, Michel J, Weigand S, Grebmer C, et al. Electric cars and electromagnetic interference with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a cross-sectional evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(5):350–2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tondato F, Bazzell J, Schwartz L, Mc Donald BW, Fisher R, Anderson SS, et al. Safety and interaction of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators driving a hybrid vehicle. Int J Cardiol. 2017;227:318–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lennerz C, Schaarschmidt C, Blažek P, Knoll K, Kottmaier M, Reents T, et al. High-power chargers for electric vehicles: are they safe for patients with pacemakers and defibrillators? EP Europace. 2023;25(5).

Burri H, MondouagneEngkolo LP, Dayal N, Etemadi A, Makhlouf AM, Stettler C, Trentaz F. Low risk of electromagnetic interference between smartphones and contemporary implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2016;18(5):726–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lennerz C, Pavaci H, Grebmer C, Semmler V, Bourier F, Haller B, et al. Electromagnetic interference in cardiac implantable electronic devices: is the use of smartphones safe? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(1):108–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Held EP, Shehata M, Swerdlow CD, Sandhu RK. To the Editor-Interference of smartphones containing magnets and cardiac implantable electronic devices-is this common? Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(6):1042–3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lacour P, Parwani AS, Schuessler F, Hohendanner F, Heinzel FR, Trippel TD, et al. Are contemporary smartwatches and mobile phones safe for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(9):1158–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Apakuppakul S, Methachittiphan N, Apiyasawat S. Effect of electromagnetic interference from SmartPHone on cardiac ImplaNtable electronic device (EMI-PHONE study). J Arrhythm. 2022;38(5):778–82.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tzeis S, Asvestas D, Moraitis N, Vardas EP, Mililis P, Letsas K, et al. Safety of smartwatches and their chargers in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2021;23(1):99–103.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aerts S, Calderon C, Valič B, Maslanyj M, Addison D, Mee T, et al. Measurements of intermediate-frequency electric and magnetic fields in households. Environ Res. 2017;154:160–70.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tomitsch J, Dechant E. Exposure to electromagnetic fields in households–trends from 2006 to 2012. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015;36(1):77–85.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tondato F, Ng DW, Srivathsan K, Altemose GT, Halyard MY, Scott LR. Radiotherapy-induced pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator malfunction. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6(3):243–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Misiri J, Kusumoto F, Goldschlager N. Electromagnetic interference and implanted cardiac devices: the medical environment (part II). Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(6):321–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gajšek P, Ravazzani P, Grellier J, Samaras T, Bakos J, Thuróczy G. Review of studies concerning electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure assessment in europe: low frequency fields (50 Hz-100 kHz). International journal of environmental research and public health. 2016;13(9).

Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health physics. 2020;118(5):483–524.

Stunder D, Seckler T, Joosten S, Zink MD, Driessen S, Kraus T, et al. In vivo study of electromagnetic interference with pacemakers caused by everyday electric and magnetic fields. Circulation. 2017;135(9):907–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ismail MM, Badreldin AM, Heldwein M, Hekmat K. Third-generation mobile phones (UMTS) do not interfere with permanent implanted pacemakers. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE. 2010;33(7):860–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Driessen S, Napp A, Schmiedchen K, Kraus T, Stunder D. Electromagnetic interference in cardiac electronic implants caused by novel electrical appliances emitting electromagnetic fields in the intermediate frequency range: a systematic review. EP Europace. 2018;21(2):219–29.

Article  Google Scholar 

Biviano A, Mancini D, Naka Y, Arellano J, Garan H. Overcoming electromagnetic interference by LVADs on ICD function by shielding the ICD programmer wand and extension cable. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE. 2009;32(7):945–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zradziński P, Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Leszko W. Evaluation of the safety of users of active implantable medical devices (AIMD) in the working environment in terms of exposure to electromagnetic fields - practical approach to the requirements of European Directive 2013/35/EU. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018;31(6):795–808.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suhail Arain S, Cretnik A, Huemer M, Attanasio P, Nagel P, Landmesser U, et al. Risk of occurrence of electromagnetic interference from the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the sensing function of implantable defibrillators. Europace. 2023;25(7).

Stühlinger M, Burri H, Vernooy K, Garcia R, Lenarczyk R, Sultan A, et al. EHRA consensus on prevention and management of interference due to medical procedures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2022;24(9):1512–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gryz K, Karpowicz J, Zradziński P. Complex electromagnetic issues associated with the use of electric vehicles in urban transportation. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;22(5).

Gnann T, Funke S, Jakobsson N, Plötz P, Sprei F, Bennehag A. Fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles: today’s situation and future needs. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 2018;62:314–29.

Article  Google Scholar 

Falchetta G, Noussan M. Electric vehicle charging network in Europe: an accessibility and deployment trends analysis. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 2021;94:102813.

Article  Google Scholar 

Campi T, Cruciani S, Maradei F, Feliziani M. Magnetic field during wireless charging in an electric vehicle according to Standard SAE J2954. Energies. 2019;12(9):1795.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hu J, Xu X, Zheng T, Lan H, Cao D, Liu G. Experimental study of radiated magnetic field from electric vehicle wireless charging system. IEEE Electromagnet Compatib Mag. 2021;10(4):46–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW, Estes M 3rd, Griffith JL, Steffens RA, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(21):1473–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Trigano AJ, Azoulay A, Rochdi M, Campillo A. Electromagnetic interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and digital cellular phones: experimental study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22(4 Pt 1):588–93.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tandogan I, Temizhan A, Yetkin E, Guray Y, Ileri M, Duru E, Sasmaz A. The effects of mobile phones on pacemaker function. Int J Cardiol. 2005;103(1):51–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Misiri J, Kusumoto F, Goldschlager N. Electromagnetic interference and implanted cardiac devices: the nonmedical environment (part I). Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(5):276–80.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Occhetta E, Plebani L, Bortnik M, Sacchetti G, Trevi G. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cellular telephones: is there any interference? Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE. 1999;22(7):983–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar