Arias-Moliz MT, Camilleri J. The effect of the final irrigant on the antimicrobial activity of root canal sealers. J Dent. 2016;52:30–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferreira GC, Pinheiro LS, Nunes JS, Almeida Mendes R, Schuster CD, Soares RG, et al. Evaluation of the biological and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021;110(6):1344–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim J, Cho SY, Choi Y, Kim D, Shin SJ, Jung IY. Clinical efficacy of sealer-based obturation using calcium silicate sealers: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2022;48(2):144–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Candeiro GTM, Correia FC, Duarte MAH, Ribeiro-Siqueira DC, Gavini G. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2012;38(6):842–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vertuan GC, Duarte MAH, de Moraes IG, Piazza B, de Vasconcelos BC, Alcalde MP, et al. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of a new root canal sealer. J Endod. 2018;44(3):501–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faria-Júnior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M, Berbert FLCV, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Antibiofilm activity, pH and solubility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2013;46(8):755–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Souza LC, Neves GST, Kirkpatrick T, Letra A, Silva R. Physicochemical and biological properties of AH Plus bioceramic. J Endod. 2023;49(1):69–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Donnermeyer D, Bürklein S, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology. 2019;107(4):421–36.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koutroulis A, Kuehne SA, Cooper PR, Camilleri J. The role of calcium ion release on biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties of hydraulic cements. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19019.

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mamootil K, Messer HH. Penetration of dentinal tubules by endodontic sealer cements in extracted teeth and in vivo. Int Endod J. 2007;40(11):873–81.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khalil I, Naaman A, Camilleri J. Properties of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod. 2016;42(10):1529–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:103–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seron MA, Nunes GP, Ferrisse TM, et al. Postoperative pain after root canal filling with bioceramic sealers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Odontology. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00830-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silva EJNL, Canabarro A, Andrade MRTC, Cavalcante DM, Von Stetten O, da Fidalgo TKS, et al. Dislodgment resistance of bioceramic and epoxy sealers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19(3):221–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020.

Kara Tuncer A, Tuncer S, Gökyay SS. Correlation between sealer penetration into dentinal tubules and bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based and an epoxy resin-based, endodontic sealer. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2013;28(7):702–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Amoroso-Silva PA, Guimarães BM, Marciano MA, Duarte MAH, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, et al. Microscopic analysis of the quality of obturation and physical properties of MTAFillapex. Microsc Res Tech. 2014;77(12):1031–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silva RV, Silveira FF, Horta MCR, Duarte MAH, Cavenago BC, de Morais IG, et al. Filling effectiveness and dentinal penetration of endodontic sealers: a stereo and confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(5):541–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nikhil V, Bansal P, Sawani S. Effect of technique of sealer agitation on percentage and depth of MTA Fillapex sealer penetration: a comparative in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(2):119.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Akcay M, Arslan H, Durmus N, Mese M, Capar ID. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: a confocal microscopic study. Lasers Surg Med. 2016;48(1):70–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Menezes M, Prado M, Gomes B, Gusman H, Simão R. Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(4):396–403.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cruz ATG, Grecca FS, Piasecki L, Wichnieski C, Westphalen VPD, Carneiro E, et al. Influence of the calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on dentinal tubule penetration of two root canal sealers. Eur Endod J. 2017;2(1):1–6.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Piazza B, Rivera Pena ME, Alcalde MP, de Vasconcelos BC, Duarte MAH, de Moraes IG, et al. The influence of humidity on intra-tubular penetration and bond strength of AH plus and MTA fillapex: an in vitro study. Eur Endod J. 2017;3(1):48–54.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jardim Del Monaco R, Tavares de Oliveira M, de Lima AF, Scarparo Navarro R, Zanetti RV, de FátimaTeixeira da Silva D, et al. Influence of Nd: YAG laser on the penetration of a bioceramic root canal sealer into dentinal tubules: a confocal analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0202295.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim Y, Kim BS, Kim YM, Lee D, Kim SY. The penetration ability of calcium silicate root canal sealers into dentinal tubules compared to conventional resin-based sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Materials. 2019;12(3):531.

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gunes B, Yeter KY, Terlemez A, Seker B, Altay Y. Dentinal tubule penetration of endodontic sealers after nonthermal plasma treatment: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82(6):903–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El Hachem R, Khalil I, Le Brun G, Pellen F, Le Jeune B, Daou M, et al. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Clin Oral Invest. 2019;23(4):1871–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Giovarruscio M, Humberto M, Méndez FJ, Pérez C, Cerda I, Sauro S, et al. Bacterial percolation and sealer tubular penetration in a polymer-based obturation system compared with warm vertical condensation technique: an in vitro study. Iran Endod J. 2020;15(4):246–52.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Bem IA, de Oliveira RA, Weissheimer T, Bier CAS, Só MVR, da Rosa RA. Effect of ultrasonic activation of endodontic sealers on intratubular penetration and bond strength to root dentin. J Endod. 2020;46(9):1302–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Coronas VS, Villa N, do Nascimento AL, Duarte PHM, da Rosa RA, Só MVR. Dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer using a specific calcium fluorophore. Brazil Dent J. 2020;31(2):109–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yang R, Tian J, Huang X, Lei S, Cai Y, Xu Z, et al. A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, iRoot SP, and AH Plus with different obturation techniques. Clin Oral Invest. 2021;25(6):4163–73.

Article  Google Scholar 

Muedra P, Forner L, Lozano A, Sanz JL, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Guerrero-Gironés J, et al. Could the calcium silicate-based sealer presentation form influence dentinal sealing? An in vitro confocal laser study on tubular penetration. Materials. 2021;14(3):659.

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kakani AK, Veeramachaneni C, Tummala M, Majeti C, Ravi R, Chaudhari WA. Relationship between the depth of penetration and fracture resistance of various sealers: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(1):34–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Furtado TC, Bem IA, Machado LS, Pereira JR, Só MVR, Rosa RA. Intratubular penetration of endodontic sealers depends on the fluorophore used for CLSM assessment. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;84(2):305–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eskander M, Genena S, Zaazou A, Moussa S. Effect of phytic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on penetration depth of bioceramic and resin sealers. Aust Endod J. 2021;47(3):506–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alim Uysal BA, Kotan G, Guneser MB, Dincer AN, Senturk H, Rafiqi AM. Investigation of the effect of different chelation solutions on penetration of resin-based and bioceramic sealers with a novel method. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84(7):1571–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sonu K, Girish T, Ponnappa K, Kishan K, Thameem P. “Comparative evaluation of dentinal penetration of three different endodontic sealers with and without smear layer removal” - Scanning electron microscopic study. Saudi Endod J. 2016;6(1):16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen H, Zhao X, Qiu Y, Xu D, Cui L, Wu B. The tubular penetration depth and adaption of four sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–8.

Google Scholar 

Turkyilmaz A, Erdemir A. Comparison of dentin penetration ability of different root canal sealers used with different obturation methods. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83(12):1544–51.