Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(12):1726–1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 [publishedOnline First: 20060916]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dobre R, Niculescu DA, Petca RC et al (2021) Adherence to anti-osteoporotic treatment and clinical implications after hip fracture: a systematic review. J Pers Med 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050341 [published Online First: 20210424]
Long H, Cao R, Zhang H et al (2022) Incidence of hip fracture among middle-aged and older Chinese from 2013 to 2015: results from a nationally representative study. Arch Osteoporos 17(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01082-0 [published Online First: 20220311]
Si L, Winzenberg TM, de Graaff B et al (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions. Osteoporos Int 25(8):1987–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2636-2 [published Online First: 20140222]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van Geel TA, van Helden S, Geusens PP et al (2009) Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 68(1):99–102. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.092775 [published Online First: 20080803]
González-Quevedo D, Pérez-Del-Río V, Moriel-Garceso D et al (2022) A 2-year follow-up of a novel fracture liaison service: can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study. Osteoporos Int 33(8):1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06298-x [published Online First: 20220331]
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Javaid MK (2021) Efficacy and efficiency of fracture liaison services to reduce the risk of recurrent osteoporotic fractures. Aging Clin Exp Res 33(8):2061–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01844-9 [published Online First: 20210528]
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hoit G, Whelan DB, Atrey A et al (2022) Association of age, sex and race with prescription of anti-osteoporosis medications following low-energy hip fracture in a retrospective registry cohort. PLoS One 17(12):e0278368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278368 [published Online First: 20221201]
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Singh S, Whitehurst DG, Funnell L et al (2019) Breaking the cycle of recurrent fracture: implementing the first fracture liaison service (FLS) in British Columbia, Canada. Arch Osteoporos 14(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0662-6 [published Online First: 20191127]
Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ et al (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24(8):2135–2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z [published Online First: 20130416]
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van den Berg P, van Haard PMM, van der Veer E et al (2018) A dedicated Fracture Liaison Service telephone program and use of bone turnover markers for evaluating 1-year persistence with oral bisphosphonates. Osteoporos Int 29(4):813–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4340-5 [published Online First: 20171219]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
IOF Capture the Fracture [cited 2023 30th March]. Available from: https://www.capturethefracture.org/ accessed 30th March 2023.,
Mugnier B, Daumas A, Doddoli S et al (2020) Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg. Osteoporos Int 31(4):765–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05290-7 [published Online First: 20200111]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wu C-H, Tu S-T, Chang Y-F et al (2018) Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Bone 111:92–100
Li N, Hiligsmann M, Boonen A et al (2021) The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 32(8):1517–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05911-9 [published Online First: 20210407]
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aziziyeh R, Perlaza JG, Saleem N et al (2021) Benefits of fracture liaison services (FLS) in four Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina. J Med Econ 24(1):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2020.1864920
Chang C-B, Yang R-S, Chang L-Y et al (2021) One-year outcomes of an osteoporosis liaison services program initiated within a healthcare system. Osteoporosis Int 32:2163–2172
Yan C, Chen Y, Cao J, Fang K, Shao L, Luo Y, Yang L (2023) The effectiveness of fracture liaison services in patients with hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon 9(10):e20838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20838
Wu CH, Kao IJ, Hung WC et al (2018) Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 29(6):1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4411-2 [published Online First: 20180219]
Thusini S, Milenova M, Nahabedian N et al (2022) Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 22(1):1083. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08171-3 [published Online First: 20220824]
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Masters R, Anwar E, Collins B et al (2017) Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 71(8):827–834. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208141 [published Online First: 20170329]
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023): Cochrane, 2023. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
Stone PW (2005) Return-on-investment models. Appl Nurs Res 18(3):186–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.05.003
McIntosh E (2010) Applied methods of cost-benefit analysis in health care. Oxford University Press
Ganda K, Puech M, Chen J et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int 24:393–406
Beaupre LA, Lier D, Smith C et al (2020) A 3i hip fracture liaison service with nurse and physician co-management is cost-effective when implemented as a standard clinical program. Arch Osteoporos 15(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00781-w [published Online First: 20200722]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Lier DA et al (2007) Persistence, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve the quality of osteoporosis care after a fracture of the wrist: results of a controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 18(3):261–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0248-1 [published Online First: 20061104]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Majumdar SR, Lier DA, Beaupre LA et al (2009) Osteoporosis case manager for patients with hip fractures: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 169(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.169.1.25
Majumdar SR, Lier DA, Hanley DA et al (2017) Economic evaluation of a population-based osteoporosis intervention for outpatients with non-traumatic non-hip fractures: the "Catch a Break" 1i [type C] FLS. Osteoporos Int 28(6):1965–1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3986-3 [published Online First: 20170309]
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Majumdar SR, Lier DA, Leslie WD (2013) Cost-effectiveness of two inexpensive postfracture osteoporosis interventions: results of a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(5):1991–2000. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-1034 [published Online First: 20130417]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Majumdar SR, Lier DA, McAlister FA et al (2019) Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis interventions to improve quality of care after upper extremity fracture: results from a randomized trial (C-STOP Trial). J Bone Miner Res 34(7):1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3699 [published Online First: 20190318]
Majumdar SR, Lier DA, Rowe BH et al (2011) Cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1799–1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1412-1 [published Online First: 20100929]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saunders H, Sujic R, Bogoch ER et al (2021) Cost-utility analysis of the Ontario fracture screening and prevention program. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103(13):1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.20.00795
Senay A, Fernandes JC, Delisle J et al (2021) Patient healthcare trajectory and its impact on the cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services. J Bone Miner Res 36(3):459–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4216 [published Online First: 20210123]
Yong JH, Masucci L, Hoch JS et al (2016) Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 27(1):231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3280-1 [published Online First: 20150815]
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leal J, Gray AM, Hawley S et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res 32(2):203–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2995 [published Online First: 20161101]
McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA et al (2011) Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2083–2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1534-0 [published Online First: 20110524]
留言 (0)