Agudo, U., & Matute, H. (2021). The influence of algorithms on political and dating decisions. PLOS ONE, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249454

Allam, A., Schulz, P. J., & Nakamoto, K. (2014). The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: Two experiments manipulating Google output. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2642

Anderson, N. (1958). Test of a model for opinion change. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 59(3), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042539

Article  Google Scholar 

Arendt, F., & Fawzi, N. (2018). Googling for Trump: Investigating online information seeking during the 2016 US presidential election. Information, Communication & Society, 22(13), 1945–1955. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1473459

Article  Google Scholar 

Athukorala, K., Glowacka, D., Jacucci, G., Oulasvirta, A., & Vreeken, J. (2015). Is exploratory search different? A comparison of information search behavior for exploratory and lookup tasks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2635–2651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23617

Article  Google Scholar 

Bak-Coleman, J. B., Kennedy, I., Wack, M., Beers, A., Spiro, E. S., Starbird, K., & West, J. D. (2022). Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation. Nature Human Behavior, 6(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01388-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Baldwin, T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x

Article  Google Scholar 

BBC. (2017, December 21). Facebook ditches fake news warning flag. Retrieved October 26, 2023, from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42438750

Beazley, M. B. (2013). Ballot design as fail-safe: An ounce of rotation is worth a pound of litigation. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 12(1), 18–52. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2012.0171

Article  Google Scholar 

Bogert, E., Schecter, A., & Watson, R. T. (2021). Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87480-9

Bruine de Bruin, W. (2005). Save the last dance for me: Unwanted serial position effects in jury evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 118(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.08.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bruns, H., Dessart, F. J., Krawczyk, M. W., Lewandowsky, S., Pantazi, M., Pennycook, G., Schmid, P., & Smillie, L. (2023). The role of (trust in) the source of prebunks and debunks of misinformation. Evidence from online experiments in four EU countries. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/vd5qt

Burt, A. (2019). Can Facebook ever be fixed? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved May, 11, 2019, from https://hbr.org/2019/04/can-facebook-ever-be-fixed

Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.7.2.91

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chigne, J. P. (2018). Google’s leaked internal video ‘The Selfish Ledger’ shows how a population could be controlled by data. Tech Times. Retrieved May 24, 2018, from https://www.techtimes.com/articles/228053/20180518/googles-leaked-internal-video-the-selfish-ledger-shows-how-a-population-could-be-controlled-by-data.htm

Chitika Insights. (2013). The value of Google results positioning. Chitika. http://info.chitika.com/uploads/4/9/2/1/49215843/chitikainsights-valueofgoogleresultspositioning.pdf

Cutrell, E., & Guan, Z. (2007). What are you looking for? An eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 407–416). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240690

Danbury, A., Palazza, M., Mortimer, K., & Siano, A. (2013). Advertising and brand trust: Perspectives from the UK and Italy. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Corporate & Marketing Communication: Responsible Communication - Past, Present, Future (pp. 1–11). University of Salerno.

Google Scholar 

Dean, B. (n.d.). We analyzed 5 million Google search results. Here’s what we learned about organic CTR. Backlinko. Retrieved August 27, 2022, from https://backlinko.com/google-ctr-stats

Draws, T., Tintarev, N., Gadiraju, U., Bozzon, A., & Timmermans, B. (2021). This is not what we ordered: Exploring why biased search result rankings affect user attitudes on debated topics. In: Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404835.3462851

Ebbinghaus, H. (2013). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Annals of Neuroscience, 20(4), 155–156. https://doi.org/10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408

Article  Google Scholar 

Edelman, B. (2011). Adverse selection in online “trust” certifications and search results. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.06.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Epstein, R. (2016). Free isn’t freedom: How Silicon Valley tricks us. Motherboard https://motherboard.vice.com/read/free-isnt-freedom-epstein-essay

Google Scholar 

Epstein, R. (2018a). Manipulating minds: The power of search engines to influence votes and opinions. In M. Moore & D. Tambini (Eds.), Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (pp. 294–319). Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar 

Epstein, R. (2018b). Transcript to Google’s internal video, “The Selfish Ledger.” American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology. https://aibrt.org/downloads/GOOGLE-Selfish_Ledger-TRANSCRIPT.pdf

Epstein, R. (2019). Why Google poses a serious threat to democracy and how to end that threat. Mercatornet https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/why-google-poses-a-serious-threat-to-democracy-and-how-to-end-that-threat/

Google Scholar 

Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. E. (2015). The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(33), E4512–E4521. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419828112

Article  Google Scholar 

Epstein, R., Ding, M., Mourani, C., Newland, A., Olson, E., & Tran, F. (2023). Multiple searches increase the impact of similarly biased search results: An example of the “multiple exposure effect” (MEE). SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4636728

Google Scholar 

Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. E. (2016, April 28–May 1). Suppressing the search engine manipulation effect (SEME), plus methods for suppressing the effect [Paper presentation]. The Western Psychological Association 96th Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, United States.

Epstein, R., Lee, V., Mohr, R., & Zankich, V. R. (2022). The Answer Bot Effect (ABE): A powerful new form of influence made possible by intelligent personal assistants and search engines. PLOS ONE, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268081

Eslami, M., Vaccaro, K., Karahalios, K., & Hamilton, K. (2017). “Be careful; things can be worse than they appear”: Understanding biased algorithms and users’ behavior around them in rating platforms. Proceedings of the 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 62–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fast, N., & Jago, A. (2020). Privacy matters…or does it? Algorithms, rationalization, and the erosion of concern for privacy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feezell, J. T., Wagner, J. K., & Conroy, M. (2021). Exploring the effects of algorithm-driven news sources on political behavior and polarization. Computers in Human Behavior, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106626

Fortune. (n.d.). World’s most admired companies. Retrieved December 7, 2020, from https://fortune.com/worlds-most-admired-companies/

Ghose, A., Ipirotis, P., & Li, B. (2014). Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Management Science, 60(7), 1617–1859. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.2013.1828

Article  Google Scholar 

Google. (n.d.). How Search works. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.google.co.uk/intl/en_uk/search/howsearchworks/mission/users/

Google. (2018). Twiddler quick start guide. Retrieved February 11, 2021, from https://aibrt.org/downloads/GOOGLE_2018-Twiddler_Quick_Start_Guide-Superroot.pdf

Granka, L., Joachims, T., & Gay, G. (2004). Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 478–479). https://doi.org/10.1145/1008992.1009079

Grant, D. (2017). The ballot order effect is huge: Evidence from Texas. Public Choice, 172, 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0454-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Haas, A., & Unkel, J. (2017). Ranking versus reputation: Perception and effects of search result credibility. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(12), 1285–1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1381166

Article  Google Scholar 

Hardwick, J. (n.d.). Top Bing searches. Ahrefs Blog. Retrieved November 17, 2020, from https://ahrefs.com/blog/top-bing-searches/

Hazan, J. G. (2013). Stop being evil: A proposal for unbiased Google Search. Michigan Law Review, 111(5), 789–820.

Google Scholar 

Hendler, J., & Mulvehill, A. (2016). Social machines: The coming collision of artificial intelligence, social networking, and humanity. Apress.

Book  Google Scholar 

Ho, D., & Imai, K. (2008). Estimating causal effects of ballot order from a randomized natural experiment the California alphabet lottery, 1978–2002. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn018

Article  Google Scholar 

Hogarth, R. M., Lejarraga, T., & Soyer, E. (2015). The two settings of kind and wicked learning environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415591878

Article  Google Scholar 

Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Radlinski, F., & Gay, G. (2007). Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transaction on Information Systems, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/1229179.1229181

Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2014). The role of search result position and source trustworthiness in the selection of web search results when using a list or a grid interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.846790

Article  Google Scholar 

Kieta, A. R., Cihon, T. M., & Abdel-Jalil, A. (2018). Problem solving from a behavioral perspective: Implications for behavior analysts and educators. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9296-9

Article  Google Scholar 

Kimble, G. A. (1961). Hilgard and Marquis’ conditioning and learning (2nd ed.). Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/14591-000

Book  Google Scholar 

Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., Johnson, B. K., Westerwick, A., & Donsbach, W. (2015). Political online information searching in Germany and the United States: Confirmation bias, source credibility, and attitude impacts. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12154

Article  Google Scholar 

Koppell, J. G., & Steen, J. A. (2004). The effects of ballot position on election outcomes. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00151.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Kramer, M. (2019). With Facebook falling out of favor, will Instagram be enough to rescue shareholders? CCN. Retrieved July 7, 2022, from https://www.ccn.com/with-facebook-falling-out-of-favor-will-instagram-be-enough-to-rescue-shareholders/

Lakshmanan, R. (2019). Project Veritas releases ‘internal documents’ from Google and alleges anti-conservative bias. The Next Web. Retrieved September 3, 2021, from https://thenextweb.com/google/2019/08/15/project-veritas-releases-internal-documents-from-google-and-alleges-anti-conservative-bias/

Lerman, D. C., Iwata, B. A., Shore, B. A., & Kahng, S. (1996). Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement: Implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-153

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Loftus, E. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Logg, J., Minson, J., & Moore, D. (2018). Do people trust algorithms more than companies realize? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved April 12, 2021, from https://hbr.org/2018/10/do-people-trust-algorithms-more-than-companies-realize

Logg, J., Minson, J., & Moore, D. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005

Article  Google Scholar 

Lorigo, L., Haridasan, M., Brynjarsdottir, H., Xia, L., Joachims, T., Gay, G., Granka, L., Pellacini, F., & Pan, B. (2008). Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20794

Article  Google Scholar 

Ludolph, R., Allam, A., & Schulz, P. J. (2016). Manipulating Google’s knowledge box to counter biased information processing during an online search on vaccination: Application of a technological debiasing strategy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5430

Mack, C. C., Cinel, C., Davies, N., Harding, M., & Ward, G. (2017). Serial position, output order, and list length effects for words presented on smartphones over very long intervals. Journal of Memory and Language, 9, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.009

Article  Google Scholar